September 30, 2005
Then why are my taxes so high?
Sept. 30 - I'm too tired to do a total deconstruct of remarks made by Canada's Ambassador to the U.S. Frank McKenna (
McKenna calls United States government dysfunctional) but he does have a few good points:
"In Canada, whether we like it or not -- and often we don't like it -- but essentially we have party discipline, and if you can convince the Prime Minister or a minister that something should be done, invariably it can end up being done," Mr. McKenna said.
True, totalitarian governments do tend to be more efficient, but the question lingers: what if you
can't convince the PM to do something?
And then there's this:
At the same time, he said, the United States faces "a very difficult financial situation," with predictions its deficit will hit or exceed US$500-billion this year.
"That's not to speak of the fact that that doesn't include unfunded liabilities for social security, which, some estimate, could run into the twenties and thirties of trillions of dollars."
By comparison, Canada is in its eighth consecutive year of surplus, with a dropping ratio of debt to gross domestic product, he said.
Yeah, we know how you reduced the national debt. The military, health care system and provinces were underfunded, but the economy was so robust that we could
afford the corruptions of Adscam and the unfolding questions about Earncliffe contracts.
"Our pension plan, instead of being in deficit, is actuarially balanced for the next 75 years."
He also praised Canada's health care system and the country's abundance of natural resources.
Whatever, dude. Just don't get sick up here.
(Link via Neale News.)
Posted by: Debbye at
05:42 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 279 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Absolutely brilliant!
I stumbled across this blog and it's like comedy gold.
"Just don't get sick up here (in Canada)" where EVERYONE is covered by health care, as oppossed by God's Land, the U.S.A., where anyone less than middle-class is screwed into debt when they get sick?
Comedy gold. Thank you again for the effort.
Posted by: Brazen Allig at September 30, 2005 09:07 PM (jEx8I)
2
You don't live in Toronto, I take it.
Posted by: Debbye at October 01, 2005 06:53 AM (RU4Zm)
3
I see Brazen has trundled out the old canard about everyone in America either dying or going bankrupt when they get ill. Funny how so many people still want to go there to live and work. Funny how so many people are still alive and working down there.
On the subject of McKenna's stuck-on-stupid rantings, you make the right point, Debbye, totalitarianism is wunderbar, as long as you are on the right, or in this case, left side. I am sure there wre lots of Germans in the 1930s who made the same case for one man rule. As Churchill said, I believe, democracy is the least bad system.
As for getting things done, when an earthquake of order 7 hits Vancouver, we shall see if Canada, with all her refined and effeminate virtues, will be able to muster the wherewithall to do anything at all to help. I can alrady see the CBC (if it still existed) covering in breathless awe our 3 rusty but heroic jeeps trundling across Sakatchewan carrying aid to the afflicted.
Posted by: keith at October 01, 2005 09:49 AM (xfdnu)
4
If Canada eliminated government health care, your taxes would drop enough you could buy a great health insurance policy and have money left over - and you'd end up with better health care, no waiting lists.
Socialist health care might have an advantage tho when terrorists attack or when something like an earthquake happens - none of the victims will have to provide policy numbers or anything like that.
They'll still have to get on that waiting list tho.
Posted by: Jay at October 01, 2005 02:14 PM (PIbeE)
5
DEBBYE,
I was almost willing to accept your response as I don't often have to go to the hospital myself and I'm not sure what it's like. Maybe your family has had problems that the hospital has dealt with poorly or slowly and I'm not certain, so no comment on that.
However, would the United States be much better? I hope you're rich. Maybe you are. But if you aren't, you have no reason to expect it's any better at the working class/no health insurance level.
And even if you are well off and could afford good health insurance, it isn't a great position to be putting out everyone who CANT afford that - including myself.
That's where Canada has the moral advantage on America. It's not like we're perfect, but at least we TRY to take care of everyone (without blessing them with a huge bill of course).
KEITH,
You must be the real comedian on this site... I'll pick on you instead of Debbye.
"Funny how so many people still want to go there to live and work."
- That's a good response, EXCEPT FOR ONE THING... Only the people who can make lots of money want to go to the United States!!! You don't see working class poor people on their way down south very often, and that's the majority of our population... Of course the U.S. has a profit advantage, but other than that, you treat your poor people like s-word.
-As for that line comparing Canada to Nazi Germany.... no comment. Your're a comedian AND an idiot with a lack of knowledge about history.
Posted by: Brazen at October 01, 2005 11:35 PM (jEx8I)
6
Brazen, You stupid, stupid, ignorant person. All those Mexicans crossing the Rio Grande are stockbrokers, after a bigger car and a bigger house, I presume? You dumb shit. Join me at my blog sometime where I can pummel you uninhibited by my desire to not cause a rucous over here. Canadians like you are what make me ashamed to be one.
Posted by: keith at October 02, 2005 07:22 PM (4tnEj)
7
Vote Independent for Independence!
It is the only way within the system we have right now, to make your voice and concerns be heard above the party line.
Slogan:
Divided as independents the people stand, United as partisan politics the people fall!
Start a group, organization, coalition, or party if you will to support independents. Similar to a co-op unsure about the co-op fees issue partisan and sponsorship issues? (Sponsorship pun intended)
Statement of intent!
-Municipal politics principles and format.
-Everybody votes independently in the House of Commons.
-Leader is chosen voted on from among the elected independents by the elected independents.
-Could even go one further and have municipal electees voted amongst them selves to represent province or federal?
-If possible a common set of base goals and policies. This may not be appropriate detract from the independent spirit?
Shared objectives and campaigning practices
-Centralized Fund raising
-Centralized list of candidates, emails, Ph numbers, Web pages
-Help Enlist candidates
-Enlist volunteers to help independents
-Sharing of thoughts and ideas discussion to hone campaign platforms
-Internet fund raising centralized and accountable with all books open and published online.
-Dissemination of funds according to number of constituents or possibility of election?
-Bulk advertising cheaper.
-Centralized head quarters for all candidates.
-
Posted by: NL Expatriate at October 02, 2005 08:56 PM (z7JgX)
8
Keith and Jay, I guess Brazen is doing the hit and run thingy (no surpise there.) Too many Canadians don't realize that they pay much more in taxes for public health care than Americans pay for private health care, and that the private plans usually include dental and optical benfits as well as some pharmaceutical benefits.
I've been sick and injured in the U.S. and was never refused treatment in the instances when I didn't have private coverage. Here I can't get in to see a doctor within a week when I'm sick but I know it's not an emergency - yet - so hope home remedies and the old stand-bys (stay in bed, take plenty of liquids and take aspirin for fast, fast relief) will suffice.
You'd think people would connect the dots when they read that the federal infusion of cash into health care went mostly to administrative costs but nooo, better the myth than harsh reality.
NL, I'm not a Canadian citizen but have voted Independent in the U.S. in past elections. Things have changed, though, and I now demand a government that is willing to fight and defend my freedom. I am looking forward to the day when I can vote Independent (probably Libertarian) because the danger has passed.
I guess you can say I vote Republican so I can vote Libertarian. And they say we aren't complex ...
Posted by: Debbye at October 04, 2005 02:02 PM (GL6JY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 29, 2005
The new G-G
Sept. 29 - Someone in my family asked why I had posted nothing on the Michaelle Jean, Canada's new Governor-General. I replied that she holds French citizenship, she has been appointed to represent the Queen of England, and
what's wrong with this picture? (My kids and husband are old enough to handle my
sarcasm wit.)
Well, she's announced her intention of giving up her French citizenship. I can't deny that's an improvement.
Posted by: Debbye at
09:55 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 78 words, total size 1 kb.
1
How do you buy a $100 newspaper for a buck?
Easy. You know a great paper is coming up when something important is planned like the signing in of a new GG,
The editor probably sends out a memo to all writing staff: * OK, team, Wednesday's issue will have the new GG's picture a mile wide on the front page.*
*We'll sell tons of papers. We want to draw in as many new readers as possible. That means wider readership for you. This issue demands 110% from all of you. Let's hold onto those new readers! Go!* Editor.
Yesterday's National Post was a $100 newspaper! '3s TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at September 29, 2005 11:32 AM (rmMzv)
2
Is it an improvement? What it means, to me, is that she is willing to trade in citizenships to get a cushy, highly-paid job and a free mansion, neither of which she has earned through merit. French citizenship is not granted automatically upon marriage. The candidate waits a year after the marriage, then has a window of 2 years within which they can request citizenship. Then, after jumping through many hoops and a long wait, it may be awarded. If Mme thinks so little of her French citzenship, what importance do you think she attaches to her Canadian one? Not much, I'd wager.
Posted by: keith at September 30, 2005 08:41 AM (xfdnu)
3
My comment above was not really off topic. The point is, to me the excellent edition of a newspaper happens to be more important.
When is a Governor general not really a GG? When she is a Librano lackey and fails to dissolve Parliament when all the conditions in law are there as in Bought Votes, influence peddaling and two non-confidence motions. 73s TG
Still waiting for a genuine governor general. 73s TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at September 30, 2005 11:59 AM (rmMzv)
4
You're both right, of course. Naming a television personality as G-G without regard to their qualifications - which should include some knowledge of the customs and workings of Parliament - is typtically Librano.
It's not just the G-G; an alarming number of "journalists" have been named to the Senate and patronage posts by the Libranos and I can't help believing that dangling carrots before members of the news media sends a clear message of how those who toe the line will be rewarded.
An independent press is thus rendered liable to corruption.
Okay, I am also deeply suspicious of anyone who takes out French citizenship. I know they are supposed to be our allies but the knives in my back are troubling.
Posted by: Debbye at September 30, 2005 05:00 PM (Ih9Od)
5
Debbye, Personally, I am not suspicious of everyone who takes out French citizenship (full disclosure, I did it!). My point is that if you take out any citizenship, and then toss it aside for a plum, you cannot help but cast doubt on your sincerity. I am a citizen of the French republic. I have big, big problems with much of their politics, especially their overseas dealings. I have similar misgivings about Canada, the country whose citizenship I hold by birthright. However, when I took out French citizenship, I accepted not only the privileges that come with it, but also the responsibilities. If she were attacked, I would probably go to the rescue, if I could. I would probably show up for my regiment. I won't throw that citizenship away for a few years free rent in a mansion and a fistful of dollars. It's about loyalty and responsiibility. I don't think Mme Jean has much of either. Which makes her the perfect GG for post-rational Canada (no mispelling there).
Posted by: keith at October 01, 2005 10:00 AM (xfdnu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 28, 2005
Dingwall resigns at head of Canadian Mint
Sept. 28 - David Dingwall, whose name came up during the Gomery Inquiry into Adscam and, more recently, due to his extracurricular activies as an unregistered lobbyist for grants with the Technology Partnerships Canada (TPC) on behalf of Bioniche,
resigned as head of the Canadian Mint this afternoon:
The former Liberal cabinet minister has become embroiled in controversy after it was recently revealed he failed to register as a lobbyist for a Toronto pharmaceutical company.
In a statement Wednesday he said he believed all of his actvities were above-board.
Mr. Dingwall stepped aside amid controversy about his lobbying activities, before his appointment to the Mint as well as questions about his expenses while heading up the Crown corporation.
His lobbying activities on behalf of Bioniche Life Sciences Inc. are under scrutiny by Industry Canada.
It should be noted that yesterday, Bioniche announced they would
repay Ottawa the $463,974 "success" fee.
Dingwall's expense account was reported on only this morning:
Federal documents released under the Access to Information Act show the office expenses and pay packet of David Dingwall, president of the Royal Canadian Mint, cost more than $1 million last year.
Included in Mr. Dingwall's office billings for 2004 were $1,235 for his annual golf membership, $13,228 in one day of foreign travel, and a $5,728 meal at a posh Ottawa restaurant.
And while Mr. Dingwall has a leased car courtesy of the Crown corporation, his office ran up a $2,500 tab for limousines in 2003.
The wining, dining, globe-trotting and other office expenses added up to $846,464 in 2004, mint records show. In addition, Mr. Dingwall's annual salary -- not including up to 12 per cent in performance bonuses -- is as much as $241,000.
[...]
Other billings released to [Tory critic for the mint] Mr. [Brian] Pallister show Mr. Dingwall, a Jean Chretien-era cabinet minister, has been running up a substantial tab, which included the following in 2004:
- $5,297 for various membership fees;
- $11,173 for meals in Canada;
- $3,317 in foreign dining;
- $40,355 for domestic travel;
- $92,682 for foreign travel;
- $12,487 for domestic hospitality;
- $5,998 for lease vehicle operating costs.
Mint spokeswoman Pam Aung Thin defended Mr. Dingwall's spending, saying each claim has been approved and verified by the Crown corporation's chief financial officer.
When I first began to read about the TPC transactions for which Dingwall lobbied I had to double-check to make sure he was still president of the Canadian Mint -- it seemed inconceivable that someone who already had a plush patronage appointment would also be a registered (much less un-registered) lobbyist. It just goes to prove how naive we can be about how this government operates.
Sept. 29 - The Toronto Sun isn't pulling any punches in today's editorial Dinged by David Dingwall:
This editorial is inspired by David Dingwall, a man who made $277,000 a year as president of the Royal Canadian Mint (until yesterday) and still charged Canadian taxpayers $1.79 for a bottle of water.
And, oh, yeah ... $91,437 on international travel in 2004 alone.
Greg Weston says he was
Chewing Our Money and looks on the career which Paul Martin praised in the House yesterday:
Back in 1994, Dingwall was Liberal public works minister when he publicly vowed to eradicate patronage and corruption from the awarding of massive federal advertising contracts.
The senior bureaucrat handpicked by Dingwall to clean up the advertising swamp was Chuck Guite, the same official who helped create it under the Tories.
The rest, as they say, is history. AdScam was born in Dingwall's department the next year, $350 million was blown on the scandalous advertising sponsorship program, and Guite is now facing criminal fraud charges.
[...]
Testimony at the Gomery inquiry into AdScam indicated that in 1998, for instance, Dingwall was paid $12,000 a month by a Montreal advertising executive he apparently had never met, supposedly to provide lobbying advice to VIA Rail, a Crown corporation prohibited by law from hiring lobbyists for anything.
The Montreal ad executive, Jean Lafleur, is a key player in the AdScam fiasco, and told the Gomery inquiry he was ordered by VIA to hire Dingwall and send the bills to the public railway.
Posted by: Debbye at
07:44 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 700 words, total size 5 kb.
1
This is an excellent post, and the background is great. Knowledge is power they say.
YoungConservative, a student who is a clear right thinker, deserves a visit. I think her post is similar and it's so amusing to see that. You two don't know each other, I don't think.
Someone so clued in so young is liable to become a politition. She must have great parents. 73 TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at September 29, 2005 09:44 AM (rmMzv)
2
Sorry, she's a bit new, so too far down the google list. This is better:
http://YoungConservative.Blog.ca
Way ahead of me at that age. Pretty good eh? '3s TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at September 29, 2005 09:58 AM (rmMzv)
3
It's the $1.29 he reportedly charged for a pack of chewing gum that put me over the top. A little bit of sarcasm here.
WasnÂ’t Dingwall in the cabinet when the federal government decided to give Nova Scotia several tens of millions of dollars to rebuild a highway outside of Halifax? The highway had become known as a death trap due to poor design with many fatalities occurring over the years. It turned out that Dingwall directed the money be spent in his riding repaving minor roads. He wonÂ’t be missed.
Posted by: John B at September 29, 2005 10:59 AM (ju7Wp)
4
I think you're right, John. The voters in his riding turfed him pretty soundly too.
Posted by: Debbye at September 30, 2005 05:09 PM (Ih9Od)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The ethics of Martin and his Liberals
Sept. 28 -
Toronto Tory is busy digging up questionable transactions between Liberal Party leader Paul Martin, the government he leads and corporations which, after receving government money, made sizeable donations to the Liberals and/or Martin's leadership campaign. Keep in mind that Martin was Canada's Minister of Finance for several years before his campaign for party leadership.
The Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) lies at the center of the allegations in Entry #1:
After JD Irving Limited received $700,000 in approved funding from ACOA, they donated $100,000 to Paul Martin's leadership campaign.
Oxford Frozen Foods received $1,600,000 in 2003 from ACOA, and donated at least $50,000 to Martin's leadership campaign.
Keep in mind that the list of donors has vanished from official Canadian government archives (fortunately, Google's snapshot images endure.)
And then there's TESMA, which received received $2,600,000 from ACOA and then donated $15,000 to the leadership campaign.
Is it just me? Either these corporations are so needy that they require taxpayer subsidies or they are so financially secure that they can afford to make political contributions. I don't see a middle ground which is also ethical and, to all appearances, this is a quid pro quo arrangement and the taxpayers are footing the bill.
Entry #2 on Toronto Tory's list concerns something I alluded to earlier: Martin's dilemma in trying to sandwich the date for the next election between reports on audits. I should have included trial dates!
The Earnscliffe Strategy Group has long been associated with Paul Martin, and the article $10M in federal funds go to firm linked to PM in today's Ottawa Citizen brings new figures:
The Earnscliffe Strategy Group, an Ottawa consulting firm with close political ties to Prime Minister Paul Martin, has received more than $10 million in federal government money since the Liberals took power, new documents show.
And another Ottawa polling firm that has sometimes worked with Earnscliffe received more than $61 million in the same period.
Ottawa-based EKOS Research was awarded more than 1,600 contracts over the 111/2-year period, mostly for public opinion research.
The work was done for various departments, agencies and Crown corporations.
Records tabled in the House of Commons on Monday show that Earnscliffe and its affiliates have received 269 contracts, amendments and standing offers since 1993.
During Mr. Martin's years as finance minister, his department repeatedly hired Earnscliffe to do polling and focus groups and provide communications advice, often in advance of federal budgets.
The new records show that Earnscliffe received just under $2 million from the Finance Department alone.
The finance contracts last year became the subject of a political storm as a former public works official alleged that the tendering was specially tailored to ensure the work always went to Earnscliffe. The firm denied the allegation.
Most of the finance work was done by Earnscliffe senior partners David Herle, who ran Mr. Martin's 1990 leadership bid, and Elly Alboim, a former CBC producer.
Additionally, there's been a lot of speculation that Earnscliffe is Martin's Adscam, with contracts going out for little or no work.
The apparent conflict of interest hides another weakness in the Martin government. All governments pay heed to public opinion, but public opinion is usually concerned with short term objectives and governments that lead are presumed to take a longer view.
When public opinion dominates decision-making we end up with a government that hesitates, fumbles and, shall we say, dithers. Harsher types might call it opportunism, something we expect in political parties but reject in governments.
Posted by: Debbye at
06:58 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 596 words, total size 5 kb.
1
I want to write about Earnscliffe, but where do I begin? I can't believe Paul Martin hasn't been sent to jail over his Earnscliffe dealings already...
Posted by: Toronto Tory at September 29, 2005 12:14 PM (nHgTe)
2
Toronto Tory, your assignment, if you chose to accept it, is to chain yourself to your computer and
Do The Earncliffe.
Seriously, I don't know where to start either. It's a freaking swamp.
Posted by: Debbye at September 29, 2005 08:21 PM (prfk3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 26, 2005
The value of Unasked Questions
Sept. 26 - Two items on the UN, one on oil-for-food and one on the lack of whistleblower protection in Canada have a common denominator: unasked questions.
From Fréchette's U.N. challenge (link via reader JM):
The oil-for-food report, by former U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker, said the U.N.'s systems for preventing mismanagement, corruption and communications gaps were "insufficient," and that Fréchette "knew but did not act upon" reports of major program violations.
Now I'm not a journalist and I never went to journalism school so I could be wrong but wouldn't a real reporter ask about the "knew but did not act upon" part and perhaps even about the allegations that Fréchette actually blocked reports of corruption in OFF from coming before the Security Council? But no; the very next paragraph reads:
But, Volcker concluded, both Fréchette and Annan should be part of the effort to reform the world body, the task that the Montreal-born diplomat and public servant was appointed to do seven years ago, when faith in the U.N. leadership was high.
M'kay. Faith in the U.N. leaderhsip was high when Fréchette was appointed and now, by implication, it's low. The logic of keeping Frechette on when it seems clear that she has failed to accomplish her appointed task escapes me, but I wonder if Ward is perhaps being deliberately ironic in that paragraph. Oh well, one can only hope.
Salim Mansur, always a favourite around here, doesn't mince words: Paul Martin out of touch in reference to Martin's speech to the U.N. (text of speech here.)
Mansur speculates on the kind of speech Lester Pearson would have made:
The former PM and Nobel-Prize-winning diplomat would surely have told the UN that Canada, as a founding member, found intolerable the stain on the organization's reputation due to the corruption, ineptness, nepotism and mismanagement revealed by Paul Volcker's commission of inquiry into the Iraqi Oil-for-Food scandal.
Pearson would surely have reminded the UN of his role in calling for global "partnership for development," and the necessary provision of assistance by rich countries to the poor. But he would also insist the UN cannot be trusted with increased funds unless full reform of its management practices occurred, and the UN secretariat became accountable and transparent.
His idealism was framed by realism, since he knew full well the perennial nature of evil. He would not have shirked taking responsibility for UN failure in Rwanda and the Balkans, and then in scolding member-states for their appalling disregard for the tragedy unfolding in Darfur.
Pearson would also, in my view, have made sure Canada stood firmly together with Britain and Australia as members of a great Commonwealth affirming U.S. President George Bush's message in New York on this same 60th anniversary occasion: "If member countries want the United Nations to be respected -- respected and effective -- they should begin by making sure it is worthy of respect."
My reaction to Martin's speech superceded my usual reaction to vague platitudes and drivel because I was outraged that Martin of all the leaders gathered there would have the nerve to talk about reforms and financial accountability. I did note, however, that he talked about "three pillars," a rather clear lifting of
Bush's Whitehall speech which also employed "three pillars" to explain U.S. foreign policy.
Has anyone asked why Martin felt it necessary to plagiarize the president of the United States?
Claudia Rosett writes The Buck Still Hasn't Stopped (link via Newsbeat1) that the "definitive report" issued by the Volcker Inquiry is "hefty" but not definitive.
You should read the whole thing, but this is a CanCon post so I only excerpted this bit about the man said to be Paul Martin's mentor, Maurice Strong, from page 2 of the article:
Part of the problem is that Volcker has imposed on his inquiry the standards not of a prosecutor, but of an accountant. Faced with a pole too tall to measure by hand, he instead tells us its precise circumference on the ground, and lets it go at that. Much has been aired already of Volcker's account of Annan's strange and abiding ignorance of his own son's lively lobbying for U.N.-related business. So let us focus on another character, Annan's former special adviser Maurice Strong, longtime U.N. guru of good governance. (Strong did depart the United Nations this spring, but with Annan's office expressing fervent hopes he will soon return.)
At some length, Volcker does the genuine service of laying out how Strong, in mid-1997, received a check for $988,885 made out to his name (a copy can be found on page 106, Volume II). The check was drawn on a Jordanian bank, funded by Saddam's regime, and delivered by Korean businessman Tongsun Park, who was a U.N. "back-channel" go-between with Saddam. Strong endorsed the check over to a third party to invest in a Strong family-controlled business, Cordex Petroleum. Interviewed by Volcker's team earlier this year, Strong said he did not recall receiving such a check. When shown a copy, he said he did not know the money came from Iraq. Volcker leaves the matter there, concluding that "the Committee has found no evidence that Mr. Strong was involved in Iraqi affairs, matters relating to the [Oil-for-Food] Programme or took any actions at the request of Iraqi officials."
But how hard did the Volcker committee look? In July 1997, the month before Strong cashed the Saddam-backed check, Annan was issuing his first U.N. reform program, reshaping the secretariat. Strong was the major architect of that reform, and was thanked profusely by Annan at the time for "his important contributions." A significant aspect of that reform was the consolidation of the then-new, ad hoc, and diffuse Iraq Oil-for-Food program into a single, more firmly entrenched office. This move tilted control of the daily administration of Oil-for-Food away from the Security Council and toward the secretariat. When the new, unified office set up shop three months later, in October 1997, Annan appointed Sevan as executive director. That marked the beginning of the stretch in which Sevan began taking bribes from Saddam, and the Oil-for-Food program, urged on by Annan, began to grow astronomically in size and scope. Lacking any disclosure of the secret U.N. paper trail that led to the creation of this office and its expanded mission, it is impossible to know whether Strong took a direct hand in setting up the office from which Sevan then, in effect, collaborated with Saddam. Perhaps Strong had nothing to do with it. But Volcker doesn't even ask the question.
Not asking the right questions could be due to oversight or ineptitude, right? Right.
The last item, Whistleblower fires back at Immigration and Refugee Board (link via Let It Bleed), concerns the dismissal of Selwyn Pieters, a man who had gone public with allegations of wrongdoing at the Immigration and Refugee Board:
In March 2004, Mr. Pieters complained to the Public Service Integrity Office that the politically appointed board members who are supposed to decide the fate of refugee claims were violating the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act by not writing their own decisions.
The refugee protection officer also went to the media with his allegations that civil servants were the ones who were doing the decision-making.
Following a probe by a board-hired investigator, IRB chairman Jean-Guy Fleury conceded “improper conduct occurred” in three cases and “appropriate administrative measures” were taken against four board members.
In firing him last month, executive director Marilyn Stuart-Major credited Mr. Pieters with exposing the wrongdoing in which he participated.
However, she lashed out at him for his “deliberate fabrication” in calling the problems at the board “systemic,” and for alleging a “code of silence” existed around the misconduct.
The case is complicated by claims and counter-claims of racism, harassment and retaliation, but there is another issue posed because Mr. Pieters believes that dismissing his claim that the problems at the board are systemic was done prematurely:
He also maintains it failed to delve thoroughly into his claim that the problems with decision writing were widespread.
“I said it was a systemic issue and they're saying there's no evidence of any systemic issues here,” Mr. Pieters said.
“There's no evidence because (they) didn't investigate it.”
Clearly readers can't judge if the review was inadequate, but it does raise some serious questions, including the Board investigating itself, and in light of indications during the Gomery Inquiry that civil servants often exceeded their job descriptions I think this derserves more scrutiny.
After all, if you don't ask, you won't know. Nor will we.
Posted by: Debbye at
04:54 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1426 words, total size 10 kb.
1
I saw this but didn't know how to attack it. You have done a great job and it will be in "Canadian News" tomorrow on my site.
Thanks "muchly"...
Jack
Posted by: Jack at September 26, 2005 06:59 PM (czTn2)
2
First: ADSCAM wrongdoing, sacks of cash changing hands in restaurants, buying blonde MPs to win confidence votes, Second: the obscene amount of money pissed away on the gun registry, with few records of where it went, Third: OFF allegations with Canadian government connections. (Wasn't Cretin's son-in-law on the board of Elf, the French petro company?)
If the Libranos are elected again, the Canadian people should hang their heads in shame.
Posted by: DoubtingThomas at September 26, 2005 10:29 PM (YD54c)
3
Expressed pretty much as I would have, there, Doubting Thomas.
WhistleBlower Protection law would have made a big difference in the OFF fiasco. Of course it's under intense review for the UN, now that the horse has left the barn for numbered accounts unknown. 73s TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at September 27, 2005 12:37 AM (rmMzv)
4
I couldn't watch all of Martin's speech - I was trying not to scream at the computer and/or throw something at it. The unmitigated gall of the man.
Posted by: Candace at September 27, 2005 01:06 AM (Q0CaQ)
5
Is the Libranos empire beginning to crumble? Is this the time of small beginnings for big change as evidenced with the demise of Christi in the Vancouver mayoralty race? Her supposed first step towards a Federal ministry seat.
Rubbing hands together and emitting a sidelong cackle... Bite the dirt you b... he he. 73s TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at September 27, 2005 12:08 PM (rmMzv)
6
Debbye, I recall that you and Captain Ed have conferred in the past when it comes to getting out information for the benefit of Canadians.
I have posted a comment at the,
Captains Quarters Blog and I admit to stepping close to the edge there.
If it's a case of *speak up now, or forever hold your peace*, then, considering what is coming about now in Ottawa, this is a time to thump the desk, not excessivly, but at least a little.
The enormous value of EFFECTIVE Whistle-Blower Law is gaining ground in the concious mind of more and more people.
This can bring us all many benefits. An efficient and more honest government, most important among them. 73s TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at September 27, 2005 01:30 PM (rmMzv)
7
Let's put all this in perspective; Sheila Copps could still be a heartbeat away from being the PM! instead of hosting a talkshow.
Posted by: DoubtingThomas at September 29, 2005 05:59 PM (YD54c)
8
True enough, Thomas; but then so might John Manley!
You touch on that which really bites: that this country, which does have a lot of talented and bright people, can't do better than tired party hacks and, um, colourful people like Sheila Copps.
Posted by: Debbye at September 29, 2005 08:36 PM (prfk3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 25, 2005
That damned gun registry again
Sept. 25 - I linked this in a post below but it really deserves its own spot. The alarm bells that went off when we were told that the feds had spent $1 million in software were not false, and it may well be that the gun registry is a
'Bigger fraud than AdScam':
Critics of the gun registry are eagerly awaiting Auditor General Sheila Fraser's "Canadian Firearms Program" audit which is scheduled to be released in February -- if we're not in the midst of a federal election campaign.
Fraser isn't doing interviews about the audit, which has been underway for months.
The last time her office attempted to look into gun registry spending was 2002 and the results were explosive. In fact, her team was forced to abandon its attempts to follow the spending on the gun registry because of the absence of records.
"The information on cost recovery provided to the government changed as the program developed," Fraser wrote at the time.
Originally expected to be self-financing by 1999-2000, Fraser and her auditors discovered the target for the firearms program to break even was pushed to 2013 -- an assumption that the program collect $419 million in fees in 2002-03 and about $828 million by 2007-08. (Emphasis added)
What part of accountable government don't people understand? People who vote for the Libranos do so in large part because that party says the right things; I get that. But what kind of brain death fails to connect the lapse between "saying the right things" and "doing the right things?"
There is a sick, twisted mentality at work here. Paul Martin has to time elections these days with an eye on inquiries into scandals and the reports they generate.
To reiterate an old rant, if those who froth at the mouth when they read "Halliburton" would apply some of the same passion when they read about the seemingly endless list of government mis-spending and "absence of records" we might find a lot of common ground.
To re-iterate another rant, let's see some concrete proposals from the CPC to force accountability into public spending (and that includes accountability from any agency, institution or foundation that recents public funds.)
Or, to take another view, if the aim of the Libranos is to initiate "Scandal Overdose" then they are succeeding. I know I'm weary of being angry and I can't help but wonder how many Canadians have begun to block out this kind of news simply to bring some sanity back to their lives.
(Link via Newsbeat1 via NealeNews, two of the most informative sites in Canada.)
Posted by: Debbye at
06:01 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 443 words, total size 3 kb.
1
This is an excellent post Debbye. You say you are weary of being angry. Yeah all this stuff seems to be on the edge of disbelief.
To see any concrete proposals from the CPC right now is a delemma. It's just too early to propose anything really worthy as the Lib-biased MSM would either trash it, or sell it as thei own.
Good CPC policy is more likly to be outlined during the heat and attention of an election drive. 73s TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at September 28, 2005 03:23 PM (rmMzv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 24, 2005
Ethics and the Liberals
Sept. 24 -
Bill and
Angry continue to keep their eyes on the growing questions about how some Technologies Partnerships Canada (TPC) loans were obained. Two weeks ago it was about
$3.7 million made to 3rd party intermediaries who were used to help obtain the loans, and now it appears that the investigation has
expanded from four to as many as 15 companies that are improperly using lobbyists or middlemen.
Some recent revelations bear yet more resemblence to Adscam-style dealings, namely claims that a lobbying firm, Wallding International, is owned by former Cabinet minister and president of the Royal Canadian Mint David Dingwall, was paid a $350,000 "success" fee for his assistance in getting $15 million in federal financing for Bioniche. Angry has more in this post that poses some questions about the lobbying activies of Dingwall and another former Cabinet Minister, Marc Lalonde, who served under Pierre Trudeau, and now works on behalf of TM Bioscience, a company that has also received money from the TPC.
The TPC is now being phased out and replaced with a new agency, the Transformative Technologies Program. Okay, so they discard a name that has been touched with scandal. But now I'm wondering if it is something more after reading this:
NORTH CAPE, P.E.I. (CP) - Prime Minister Paul Martin said Saturday that he intends to make Canada a major producer of renewable energy.
Martin made the commitment as he toured the site of the new Canadian Wind Energy Institute at North Cape, a blustery village at the northwestern tip of Prince Edward Island.
On Friday, the federal government, through the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency, announced it will contribute about $3.6 million toward the establishment of the institute.
As well, starting with the 2006-07 fiscal year, Natural Resources Canada will contribute $1 million annually for two years toward operating costs.
That commitment, however, is expected to extend well beyond two years, but tail off gradually as the institute's own sources of income grow.
Are institutes that receive federal financing required to be audited by the A-G or, like foundations, are they exempt?
Bill and Angry are doing fantastic jobs staying on top of this story and, like Adscam, the allegations of wrong-doing involve people who were once entrusted with the governance of this country.
This is very timely: Toronto Tory has set a self-imposed challenge:
Every day, for the next 30 days, I will post an example of a company or individual who has an unethical relationship with Paul Martin, and/or the Liberal party of Canada/Ontario.
There are more details about the challenge at
LIBERAL CORRUPTION - THE ONE MONTH CHALLENGE. Somehow I don't think there will be a lack of material.
Sept. 25 - 17:49 - I missed this post by Kate that expands on the role David Dingwall played in Adscam and connects some more dots.
So many scandals, so little time. The gun registry could be a fraud bigger than Adscam (link via Newsbeat1)"
[Auditor General Sheila] Fraser isn't doing interviews about the audit, which has been underway for months.
The last time her office attempted to look into gun registry spending was 2002 and the results were explosive. In fact, her team was forced to abandon its attempts to follow the spending on the gun registry because of the absence of records. (Emphasis added)
I feel sick.
Posted by: Debbye at
07:03 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 558 words, total size 5 kb.
1
Never thought Ethics and Liberal would appear in the same line in these troubled times.
That's a resounding == Just do it! it's easy. Just click on *send mail*
Address to:
Solbm@parl.gc.ca
Dear Monte Solberg,
On behalf of myself, my neighbours and all Canadian taxpayers, could you please do something to restrain the failing Liberal Government from this unending theft and divergence of our public revenues? The latest, a matter of $2.9 Billion.
The Canadian public may be all too unaware of the whole shocking picture, because the mainstream press is reluctant to bring the complete overview to public attention.
The media are content to bring many seemingly disconnected stories to the public eye when in fact, the
Main Headline should be that all these financial outrages are one and the same Liberal condemning story.
Thank's for helping Canadians,
Just select [highlight] text down to *Canadians*
Then right click this text and *Copy*
Then left click the Email Msg area to get a cursor and right click *Paste*.
type your name in after the comma,
Hit *send message*. You can now say you have done more than 75% of Canadians to help matters.
73s TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at September 25, 2005 04:24 AM (rmMzv)
2
SORRY:: That Email address has changed, or it may work at another time. In any case here is a just downloaded address:
Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca
73s TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at September 25, 2005 05:10 AM (rmMzv)
3
Just to set the record straight, my name is Dingwall and the name of that company is Wallding. Obviously only a very twisted mind could see any connection.
Sincerely,
David Dingwall
p.s. We appoint the judges and we never lose elections, so why should I care?
Posted by: keith at September 25, 2005 08:23 PM (4tnEj)
4
Tony, it's a good thought to contact MPs (although I think it's best if people write individual letters rather than copy/past identical letters.)
Keith, a hole in one! Why indeed should Dingwall care? It's all so sordid.
Posted by: Debbye at September 25, 2005 09:35 PM (3xkWs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 23, 2005
Our crazy Uncle Paul
Sept. 23 -
Crazy Paul's billion dollar shell game: maybe Canadians pay closer attention to US matters than Canadian ones in order to stay sane!
Posted by: Debbye at
05:13 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm kinda like Warren K. [The Fox], just being friendly to most so I can see all the apples on the table, good ones, bad ones, and then as I stumble through the bushes of life my foot stays out of bear trap... eh? [ I don't trust him either]
Microsft AntiSpyware beta1 picked up ...
Trojan.Downloader.adMSI on my computer during a 2am auto-scan, last night. Detail: http://Anchorpin.Redpin.com
I am sure glad to have downloaded this MS freebie from the MS downloads [security] site.
They scan me for everything every night and it's free. How would you like to be *scanned* every night? ok, ok, it's lame. 73 TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at September 23, 2005 05:27 PM (rmMzv)
2
Who wrote that?.. How are we supposed to know who to call when someone with their head on straight is required to run for office?
Was that Gord Walsh?.. Linda Williamson?
Crazy Paul's billion dollar shell game is an absolute gem! I printed copies off for friends.
Noted: Focus on one ot two priorities.
==========================
Noted: When everything is a priority, there are NO priorities, other than to hold power, that is.
====================================
Whistle-Blower Bill C-11 [With teeth], is THE priority. http://BendGovt.blog.ca
=======================================
The NewsPaper Association's screams about the secrecy clamp downs on 6,000 bureaucrats with a LIFE TERM oath in 12 departments of government to destroy the Freedom of Information Act, is an EMERGENCY!
That needs public exposure right now!. Canadians have been so lulled with the Pablum of the MSM, that the Liberals can not only get away with Billionesque theft, but amazingly, be voted back into office.
The Liberal Party is the MSM's biggest client, so I realize going easy is a requirement, but the National Post runs *Truth about the Liberals* stories on pages A16 to A19. At least they do something.
Liberals are content that tired Canadian readers do not make it much past page A4 or A5. So they continue to send adverts to the National Post.
This Toronto Sun writer deserves to be promoted to a position where they can encourage other writers, with the ability to see things this clearly.
Cheers, literally, TG
Http://Anchorpin.Redpin.com
Posted by: TonyGuitar at September 23, 2005 06:22 PM (rmMzv)
3
Well-written, TG.
Where the MSM is failing, the blognet will succeed.
Example:
http://thecanadiansentinel.blogspot.com/2005/09/more-manipulative-msm-bias-against.html
What happened there is that a clearly biased headline about Stephen Harper supposedly being "angry" without justifying such a claim was exposed and explained in that Canadian Sentinel post and, hours later, was changed to the believable headline stating Harper "ignores" dissidents.
I'm really a nobody with a political blogsite just created this past Sept. 11, yet cannot help but wonder if my post may have had something to do with the headline transformation, or perhaps someone else's blog or something...
This form of MSM manipulation is nothing new. They have been using misleading, unsupported, subjective and biased headlines since forever, and it must be stopped, as for many citizens with precious little free time for carefully informing themselves as to what's truly happening in their world, the headlines are a convenient lazy shortcut. Therefore, if the MSM is permitted to fool the people via this sort of crappy headlining, then it only helps the Liberals, which is bad for Canada, obviously.
We must not be discouraged or deterred or made to think we don't matter. There are those who will visit our sites and try to belittle and degrade us however they see fit, trying to make readers of our blogs think only the establisment MSM and the state have any business telling anyone what's what. I have until yesterday had a problem with one such prominent anonymous individual who just couldn't stop with his malicious pejorative nonsense, so I gave him an ultimatum to cease and desist his unnecessary attacks (which he "Liberally" spiked with personal insults and vulgarity) and ended up having to ban him from commenting. Don't be afraid to deal with these kinds of extreme troublemakers who really don't want to keep us honest or point out honest mistakes, which is what we want and need. What we don't want is simple, partisan disruption intended to negate our honest, hardworking efforts at helping to spread the truth to our fellow citizens.
http://thecanadiansentinel.blogspot.com
Posted by: Canadian Sentinel at September 24, 2005 08:57 AM (y42an)
4
Well written article and well said TG and CS. I don't know what more to add. On a good note, at least CBC's partially down and out for now. What ticks me off is when the local papers carry biased news from a eastern paper. Not that everything in the eastern papers will be propaganda (or is it all?) but we can't rely on getting all our news from Libral central. We need reporters to find out things and report of the validity of those biased articles.
Posted by: Em at September 24, 2005 05:30 PM (Uagor)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Fraud in Canada's health care system
Sept. 23 - News that billing fraud is widespread in Canada's health care system isn't exactly unexpected (
Health fraud rampant) but it is dismaying to see it confirmed:
NIAGARA FALLS, Ont. - Canada's health care system is rife with fraud that costs the public and private sectors an estimated $3-billion to $10-billion a year, the country's first-ever survey of health fraud indicates.
"It's a big problem. It's a multi-billion-dollar problem and that's a big drain on the health care system," said Michael Chettleburgh of Fraudbox Inc., which did the survey for the Canadian Health Care Anti-Fraud Association.
[...]
Speakers at the anti-fraud association's annual conference told about fraudulent billings by pharmacists, dentists and other health care professionals, as well as the growing problem of people stealing caregivers' identities to illicitly claim payments.
The article notes that the problem isn't limited to Canada, but the realization that the cracks in the taxpayer-funded health care system here are worsened by the greed of some health care professionals further erodes public faith those in the health sector have a calling to cure and heal.
The Canadian Health Care Anti-Fraud Association page doesn't have the report on its page yet but the results of the survey are available in .pdf here at the Fraudbox Inc. site.
(Via Neale News)
Posted by: Debbye at
04:01 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 224 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I've got to admit that it doesn't surprise me that much. I'd bet you anything that they money goes into Libral pockets.
Posted by: Em at September 23, 2005 09:29 PM (Uagor)
2
I'm with you, Em. We used to say "is nothing sacred?" but we don't even wonder any more.
Posted by: Debbye at September 25, 2005 09:47 PM (3xkWs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 22, 2005
Porkbusters!
Sept. 22 - Glen Reynolds is reporting on the initiative to
Cut the fat in order to pay the huge costs of Katrina's devastation, and it struck me that this easily has Canadian applications.
Cut the pork to improve the health care system.
Cut the pork to upgrade the military.
Cut the pork to reduce gas taxes.
Cut the pork to reduce taxes period.
Cut the pork to ______________ (your project.)
Posted by: Debbye at
12:44 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 73 words, total size 1 kb.
1
When all else fails, the reduce taxes idea is always a winner.
Posted by: Jay at September 23, 2005 11:11 AM (PIbeE)
2
Why Jay, I'm shocked! Don't you want your money to keep going down the drain?
Posted by: Debbye at September 23, 2005 02:52 PM (xDX+u)
3
Only if it's other people's money going down MY drain.
Posted by: Jay at September 23, 2005 08:10 PM (PIbeE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Greg Weston on Coffin's sentence
Sept. 22 - Greg Weston writes on the incredibly harsh sentence given to the first convicted participant in Adscam (from
Coffin nails Liberals?):
OTTAWA -- The Quebec judge who sentenced one of the AdScam con men to a wrist-slapping for stealing $1.5 million has certainly sent a clear message to all who would even consider ripping off the government.
In the immortal shrug of Jean Chretien: "So, maybe a few million was stolen."
For 15 counts of deliberate and systematic fraud, Montreal advertising executive Paul Coffin was sentenced this week to two years less a day "to be served in the community."
Translated, he has to be home by 9 p.m. weeknights, and lecture university students on "business ethics."
Coffin's pitch to so many young minds will no doubt include horror stories about how his utter lack of business ethics condemned him to a miserable life of big boats, fast cars, fancy houses and expensive wines.
I'm not surprised, but nonetheless I feel ashamed for this fine country.
Paul Coffin betrayed the people he was supposed to serve. He betrayed every single Canadian but the court has ruled that it's no big deal.
Does the word honour even have meaning these days? If it doesn't, and I am becoming increasingly certain that it does not, then dishonour too seemingly has no meaning. And that is the government we're stuck with.
13:57 Sleep can wait; Darcy lends some much needed perspective into Coffin's gentle treatment. Now I'm getting mad again.
Posted by: Debbye at
10:18 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 257 words, total size 2 kb.
September 15, 2005
Scandal - again!
Sept. 15 - Release of the Gomery Report on Adscam is delayed. The report on the Toronto
MFP scandel is out. The issue of accountability - or lack thereof - continues to dismay and anger us.
But scandal seems to be becoming Canada's chief industry, as Bill takes note of yet another Canadian boondoggle which is finally being subjected to scrutiny: Audit of $2.9 billion TPC program expands and (oh my aching head) Paul Martin's mentor, Maurice Strong who was also implicated in OFF, is involved. Again.
One of the findings of the Volcker Inquiry into the U.N. Oil For Food program was the extent to which corruption is institutionalized in the U.N. I fear that much the same may be said of Canada (and Ukraine) and that weeding it out will prove far more difficult than installing new leadership.
The extent of corruption in the civil service and the complacency of the news media are the ultimate impediments to honest government. It's that simple. Shame on the lot of them.
Posted by: Debbye at
06:04 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 177 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'll say welcome back, good to see you, here in the scandal zone. This is all so...uh meaty.
Have you seen the interesting petition..[it is interesting, believe me], at Darcy's DustMyBroom. I lasered off a couple of copies to get signatures from friends who are not on line.
It was Kate who mentioned you were back.
The most ominous thing lately is that the Newspaper Association is protesting loudly...[but oddly, hard to find in the MSM], about the Liberals imposing an oath of lifetime secrecy on approx 6,000 government bureaucrats. This under the guise of *terrorism security*.
Whether the same or seperate, this and delayed reviews of information available through the freedom of information act amount to a willful breach of that act.
I have a little clue about oaths and security and terms of 14, 21, 50 and 60 years are reasonable. Life term oaths are not reasonable. Suggests a government looking at permanent tenure.
The time window for review of the proposal was 30 days. The NewsPaper Association was the one and only intervener.
I suspect a possible snap election by Martin while polls are not too bad, and before Harper can gather momentum with the TV spots, you can preview on the CPC site.
It's just a wild guess though.
If that happens and Martin squeaks back in, he'll declare a mandate and file Gomery's report away in one of those 14 government departments sworn to a lifetime oath of silence.
It's a bit too much on your first day back eh? I'm not too sure of how much of this is on BendGovt.blog.ca and how much was comment on smalldeadanimals. But there are stories on these things, mostly in the National Post. 73s TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at September 15, 2005 08:12 PM (rmMzv)
2
Headline:
Bureaucrts face lifetime secrecy oath on national security
by: James Gordon
Sub: Government expands list of agencies subject to muzzling law
The Ottawa Citizen Sun. Aug14/05
Media access requests often delayed, censored, group says
By: James Gordon....Ottawa Citizen Sept 9/05
Anne Kothawala, C.N.A. president said;
*that lengthy disclosure delays have the same effect as rejecting requests outright.*
*Let's be clear, delay is partiqularly injurious to media. It can kill a story, for stories are temporary constructions of fact that collapse without the support of critical information.*
'3s TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at September 15, 2005 08:47 PM (rmMzv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Canadians troops injuried in Kabul
Sept. 15 - They hold the line so others can be free, and too often at a price:
Two Canadian soldiers were injured in Kabul by a roadside bomb during a routine patrol in preparation for Sunday's elections. Details are sketchy, but thankfully the injuries are said to be minor.
This attack is yet another in a series intended to prevent consensual government in a Muslim nation and coincides with the terror attacks in Iraq yesterday and today.
Posted by: Debbye at
05:01 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 88 words, total size 1 kb.
1
This is rather upsetting, but has to be expected. It's interesting to me that the attacks in Afghanistan are so much smaller. I wonder why that is?
Posted by: Candace at September 16, 2005 09:39 AM (GV1c0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
91kb generated in CPU 0.0733, elapsed 0.1373 seconds.
73 queries taking 0.0901 seconds, 206 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.