May 30, 2004
The terror threat and Canada
May 30 - Both Canada and the USA face national elections soon. The March 11 bombing attack in Madrid and the impact it had on the national elections there produced a lot of theorizing and speculation and Wednesday, US Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller (
ref.
'Clear and present danger') went public with their concerns about the potential for a terrorist attack in the USA given the upcoming US elections.
The inclusion of two Canadians, including the notorious Jdey, forces the thought that Canada may well be the target. (There will be a national election here June 28.)
Shortly after Sept. 11, I asked Mark what he thought the public response would be in Canada if there was a terrorist attack here. He replied that people would complain about gas prices (he's a dyed-in-the-wool cynic.)
Well, Canadians are already complaining about gas prices, so I raised the question again last night, and he responded that Canadians are finally "getting" it and would correctly aim their outrage at the terrorists even though Old Media would use the attack as another plank in their anti-American campaign.
The one thing Westerners (civilisationally, not regionally!) still have had difficulty grasping is that al Qaeda doesn't care which party rules a country: their aim is to destablize and terrify, period. How do I know that? Because al Qaeda told us so.
We also have trouble accepting what al Qaeda says at face value, even though their track record indicates that are stating the unvarnished truth.
That's why appeasement is as fruitless now as it has always been, why US withdrawal from Saudi military bases and the ending of UN sanctions on Iraq (remember bin Laden's justification for jihad against the US?) resulted in an increase of armed confrontation in Saudi Arabia and their open alignment with the Ba'athists in Iraq even though it was Saddam's corruption of the U.N. Oil-For-Food program that caused the deaths of Iraqi babies.
There is an additional complication: the full-blown, outright anti-Americanism led by the Toronto Star and CBC is bound to cause a reaction from Americans. The outpouring of American solidarity with Spain - then an ally - after the March 11 may not be matched if Canada - not an ally - is hit. The fact that Canada's military and security forces are already over-extended and the unfortunate circumstance that an idiot (Anne McClellan) is in charge of Canadian security puts the ruling Liberal Party in a bit of a briar patch: if PM Martin choses to use Opposition leader Stephen Harper's support of the US effort in Iraq as a weapon during the electoral campaign, he further exacerbates relations between the US and Canada but if a terrorist attack happens up here and he calls upon the US to help Canada, more than a few Americans will say "Call France."
It saddens me, but I'll be one of them, or at least I'll be conflicted. Is a docile Canadian citizenry worth the lives of America's sons and daughters? Or are Canadians less docile than they themselves have been led to believe?
Tomorrow is Memorial Day, and it will be sadder this year than in years past. We've lost some outstanding men and women in Iraq and will lose more. We knew going in that the losses would deprive us of the kind of people that make our country strong and could only pray that their sacrifices would inspire others much as President Lincoln articulated in his Gettysburg Address: so "they not have died in vain."
It's hard to keep perspective up here in Toronto, and hard to remember that, despite it's pretensions, Toronto is not the Center of the Universe much less Canada.
But (and this may seem contradictory) there is a different Canadian that co-exists with that portrayed by the media. The hockey game last night is a case in point: Jerome Iginla scored a Gordie Howe hat trick: a goal, an assist, and a fight.
Is a country that cheers Canadians like Iginla truly passive? I don't think so. But then, it's not me that has to get it, it's Canadians themselves who could be on the brink of defining themselves in something in terms other than unlike Americans.
Posted by: Debbye at
10:55 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 717 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Is America defined by the NY Times and CNN? Same issue at stake here - the Real Canada exists well outside the Greater Toronto Area, just as the Real America is not Manhattan. Big cities generate their own parochialism, and Toronto has laways had a bad case of that...
Posted by: JGS at May 31, 2004 10:22 AM (z9hKy)
2
Debbye:
Thank you so much for your unique perspective and insightful commentary in these uncertain times. You are a gifted writer.
Peace,
Del
Posted by: Del at May 31, 2004 06:33 PM (EfMVT)
3
Good point, JGS, and you're right of course, yet until recently, a lot of Americans did think the NY Times, the "paper of record," spoke for Americans. The hard part of living in interesting times is trying to see where true changes are taking place and where fad changes are occuring.
It seems to me that the NYT and CNN are trying to
define Americans, which is guaranteed to piss a lot of Americans right off.
I have no doubt the CBC and Star try to do the same, and my instincts tell me that Canadians too would reject such an affront to their dignity.
Del, thank you. I'm just trying to muddle my way to achieve comprehension. If I could have one wish, it would be to look in about 100 years from now and read the news and all the latest history books.
The downside of living in interesting times is that we don't get to read the Epilogue.
Posted by: Debbye at June 01, 2004 06:50 PM (B+G3D)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Is Joe Clark delusional or unscrupulous?
May 30 - A real question mark has been raised about former Progressive Conservative leader Joe Clark in this Greg Weston column
Clark, McLellan: They had it made. Read the whole thing.
I don't know if it's true; certainly it would explain some of the odd behaviour by the old Progressive Conservative party leadership, but it's based on "unnamed sources" which leaves it short of total authenticity.
Posted by: Debbye at
10:30 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 79 words, total size 1 kb.
May 22, 2004
Reads that make you go "hmm"
May 23 - When you live in Ontario, aka the Center of the Universe, news from Canada tend to end at the borders of the GTA (although some information about the national government does trickle down from Ottawa, we hear or read little about the doings in Ottawa itself.)
As for the west, if it isn't sports-related it just isn't important, right? Uh huh.
I have to get off to work, and am still wading through Bill's latest essay (see below) but if you already got through it here's a bit more:
Terror in the Heartland? by Shafer Parker and some thoughts on the defeatism of Old Media, a David Warren essay, both from the Western Standard.
Belmont Club has Trivial Pursuit and The Wedding Party 2 and Winds of Change has Why is Israel in Gaza. I'm having Jenin horror stories flashbacks. Did you really believe disinformation was a unique Western practice?
I should mention Winds of Change more often because the group puts out an incredible amount of interesting, multi-linked information. There's a number of posts on the Sufism branch of Islam and are starting a regular Hatewatch briefing.
Warning: reading Winds of Change and following their many links can become a (good) habit.
On a lighter note, Rocket Jones has a neat story about the payload aboard an amateur rocket that achieved space.
I'm off work tomorrow for Victoria Day, but looking forward to the Angel marathon running on Space: The Imagination Station (they better show Hero and Lullaby. I'm just sayin' ...)
The big news is that Philly is O-U-T of the playoffs. Boo hoo. I've got family in Tampa, but too bad, cuz. Time for the Cup to come back North.
Go Calgary! and everyone have a good weekend with lots of fireworks and fun. Hopefully the clouds will lift from Toronto for tomorrow night's bash.
Posted by: Debbye at
11:17 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 323 words, total size 3 kb.
1
...and I used to say that "the only thing that unites Canada is our comon hatred for Toronto," but times change. Or what's that quote from the Matrix: "some things never change,... but some do."
Don't take me too seriously, just a Montrealer yanking your chains...
Phil
Posted by: Philippe at May 25, 2004 04:28 AM (ktBIr)
2
Take it from this Montrealer: ask the average person on the street around here how they feel about Toronto, and you'll realize times haven't changed all that much...
Posted by: segacs at May 25, 2004 03:04 PM (mPVW9)
3
Hello to Montreal!
No offense taken - even those cities which were forced into amalgamation (and thus technically part of Toronto) hate Toronto.
I've been thinking about starting my own blue ribbon campaign down here.
Posted by: Debbye at May 26, 2004 03:00 PM (ov/pG)
4
Hey Debbye,
I like your site. ;-) I live in Toronto now but I lived in the states for 11 years of my life...raised in a conservative household and so happen to be attending the largest communist school in Canada (York 'Suck Ass' University..dont ask why) and when it comes to my site I hardly write on politics due to my readers...your site was refreshing...and a rarity among Canadian bloggers.
In other news, I hope you enjoyed the Angel Marathon...heh
I hope you don't mind me adding you to my links list.
Cheers,
Christie
Posted by: Christie at May 26, 2004 06:56 PM (GpP7H)
5
Hi Christie!
I am totally awed by the tech savvy you display on your site. (I finally figured out what the "squirrel" is that powers my site, but am still trying to savvy the hamster.)
I'll be adding you to the blogroll shortly.
Posted by: Debbye at May 31, 2004 03:08 AM (+SsmT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 20, 2004
Anti-semitism in Alberta
May 20 - There's an article by Ezra Levant in the
Western Standard to which I'm late linking but no one should miss it:
A riot, two firebombings and bin Laden graffiti--in friendly Alberta. That's right, in Alberta.
I wasted days before posting it because I was trying to summarize and isolate key quotes; it defied me, and that's a compliment. It just hangs together too well to pick and chose, and the context musn't be lost.
You might also check out this account of some gays who attempted to join a demonstration in support of the people of Palestine. The article saddened me.
Why don't women and gays recognize the danger aimed directly at them by extreme Islamicism? Probably because that kind of thing lies beyond our experiences in the West - the same kind of upside down reasoning that figures the abuses at Abu Ghraib are equal to the abuses of Saddam.
Here, a woman can get angry if a man opens the door for her. When that's the definition of oppression, how does one comprehend honour killings?
Or maybe it's all right-wing propaganda. Yeah! That's it! Right-wing racist propaganda! /sarcasm
Seeing is not necessarily believing, I guess.
Healing Iraq and Iraq the Model are full of excellent posts and provide a lot of common sense that media pundits should heed.
I have to go in to work tonight, so I'll leave you to read those.
And, sorry Sharks fans, but GO FLAMES!!.
Posted by: Debbye at
02:34 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 251 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Well, now that the Sharks are out of it, I agree with you. Go Flames!
Posted by: Ted at May 21, 2004 08:27 AM (blNMI)
2
Glad to have you aboard, Ted!
Posted by: Debbye at May 22, 2004 02:46 AM (PELMg)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Think of the children!
May 20 - No, really, that's what the Ontario premier said in defence of the latest budget:
It's for the sake of the kids.
"I know we are placing a burden on our families," McGuinty said yesterday. "I'm asking our families to think not only of themselves, but also of their children and the kind of health care system that we long to leave to the next generation." (Emphasis added)
I really wonder at our premier's lack of imagination and good sense to invoke an over-worked phrase which would inevitably provoke so much derision in order to justify tax hikes.
Sheesh, is it too much to ask that they pretend to make an effort? Like maybe try to dress old garbage in a new package? Isn't that what we pay them for?
Damian Penny recently wrote me that Helen Lovejoy is responsible for that phrase:
"Oh, won't somebody please think of the children!!!"
So there you have it folks; the Ontario budget is an upcoming Simpson's episode.
Posted by: Debbye at
01:16 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 173 words, total size 1 kb.
1
oh yeah, they're thinking of the children... they really want to leave them an impoverished, dessicated society crammed with the misery and small lives that only a socialist could bring you...
Posted by: Joe at May 21, 2004 05:40 PM (TmX/b)
2
You got it, Joe.
We wouldn't want our children to be deprived of both parents needing to work just to put food on the table, now would we?
Let us keep more money in our pockets and we'll take care of our children and see to their futures just fine.
Posted by: Debbye at May 22, 2004 09:17 PM (HM4Jw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 19, 2004
Budget puts premiums on healthcare
May 19 - It's just too depressing to post about the Ontario budget that was presented today. Cigarettes, beer and renewal of driver's licenses are going up, and in a really nasty move, we will be paying out of pocket for eye exams as well as chiropractors and physiotherapy (
Liberals see a need for health premium.)
Jack's Newswatch has a Donato cartoon that pretty much sums up my mood. CTV seems to have a pretty comprehensive round-up of today's dismal budget.
We're going to a friend's surprise birthday party, so I'll be back later.
Posted by: Debbye at
07:28 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 104 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Truly, the Dalton gang has set a new low in personal and political integrity. Next election, remember to put your hands over your ears and go " La la la...I can't hear you!"
I can't wait to see how popular this makes them as campaign buddies for Paul Martin and co. Birds of a feather indeed.
BTW, I've been out of the loop for a little while, but what happened to Andrew Coyne? No updates since April 28th, his "critical post". I hope nothing is wrong with him. I was certain the budget would pull him out of his cave, but nothing yet. Come back Andrew, we miss you!
Posted by: John H at May 19, 2004 07:55 PM (3g3kl)
2
Needless to say, I have to upgrade my driver's license in the next few weeks. At least I managed to get my eye exam done (but the wife didn't).
Posted by: David at May 20, 2004 06:54 AM (utzkC)
3
Johh, go
here and scroll down to May 7. Andrew Coyne is MIA although his column is still appearing in the Post.
David, I feel your pain. (I too procrastinted on the eye exam.)
People last night were also predicting that this budget just sank the Federal Liberals.
Posted by: Debbye at May 20, 2004 08:18 AM (LX+ND)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Court upholds restrictions on electoral spending
May 19 -
Court OKs 'gag law' or, as Damian Penny puts it,
"But for the life of me, I simply cannot comprehend the idea that less speech from anyone other than a political party is essential to safeguard democracy ..."
Bob at Let It Bleed comments on a column on the subject by the Toronto Star's Carol Goar. Needless to say, he isn't gentle.
Welcome back, Bob!
Posted by: Debbye at
07:01 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 80 words, total size 1 kb.
Zerbisias vs. Bloggers and a sad announcement
May 19 - Blog readers are probably aware of some shots exchanged between
Toronto Star columnist Antonia Zerbisias and some noted bloggers, including Damian Penny, James Lileks and Kathy Shaidle.
Damian led off with his reponse and links to other responses in Welcome Toronto Star readers, Antoniapalooza! and More Zerb Reaction (including links to James Lilek's and Bob Tarantino's reponses.)
Today, the Star published Damian's response in their Letter's to the Editor with an edit; see Damian's The Missing Scare Quotes.
I hesitated to comment on this because on one level - a level that Zerbisias should be ashamed to occupy - the woman has a point: bloggers who support Operation Iraq Freedom are less happy than we could be. The deaths that have happened this spring have hurt us. How fortunate for Zerbisias that she can sidestep that to rejoice in our grief.
We started with optimism as the new Iraq Constitution was presented only to shock when over 178 Shi'ias were killed, 140 killed in the bombing attacks of the Ashura religious processionals in Iraq and 38 in Pakistan.
Iraqi and soldier bloggers have made news of terrorist attacks very personal for us. That is one of the joys of the blogosphere, but one of the drawbacks: someone you know may be among the wounded or dead.
Does she know that there were insurrections in parts of Iran following the rigged elections there? Or that International Women's Day Marches were attacked by security forces in Iran?
Crackdowns in Iran matter to people who know that Iranian bloggers are in constant danger of exposure and arrest. Zerb, of course, doesn't have that kind of worry gnawing at her.
How about the March 11 terrorist attack in Madrid? Not a real happy event. There were also attacks in Kosovo, Israel, the Hotel Lebanon in Baghdad was bombed killing over 20 people, and the Kurds in Syria had an uprising too that was harshly put down.
A wave of anti-Semitic acts swept the Toronto area beginning that month. That didn't make me happy either, nor did the fire-bombing of a Montreal school.
Canadian Andy Bradsell was killed, as was blogger Bob Zangas and the Men of Fallujah. Fallujah was brought under control with persistence and US military deaths. I felt gratitude and humility, but not joy.
The disgraceful conduct of some soldiers at the Abu Graib prison didn't make me happy nor did the murder of Nick Berg.
Maybe we aren't happy, Zerb, because we actually care about what we read. We care about the deaths of innocents. We don't have your capacity to rejoice when innocent people die because we see things differently: you want President Bush to be proven wrong, and we want to see the end of this scourge called terrorism.
You want President Bush to be proven wrong, and we want to see Iraq take its place as a free country that can confidently take its place in the world and be a beacon of hope for Arabs.
Most of all, our focus isn't about being right, it's about trying to get it right. But then history won't judge you at all, because you won't rate a mention.
I'm bringing all this up now because another member of the blogosphere has had a death in her family. Via Wizbang, Gennie of Dizzy Girl lost her nephew in Iraq. He was a Marine who was hit by shrapnel while handing out candy and frisbee to some Iraqi kids. Read that again, and realize that the kids were present.
He was a hero, and he exemplifies everything that is right about US soldiers and our mission in Iraq.
It's so hard to write about this. It's so hard to log onto a soldier's blog, or a blog from Iraq, or a blog from Iran, and note that he or she hasn't posted for a couple of days and not be afraid for them.
The war has a personal face for most of us, and it isn't fun or happy. But for some reason, we manage to keep posting. And we manage to do it with a lot more class, restraint and compassion that anything you churn out.
Posted by: Debbye at
03:30 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 715 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Ghost of a flea at May 19, 2004 06:21 PM (HNlk3)
2
Well said, I especially like the paragraph that starts, "Maybe we aren't happy, Zerb, because we actually care about what we read." All too true.
Posted by: Bob at May 19, 2004 08:27 PM (cfsxE)
3
Get ready to be misquoted. Accidentally, of course. Or maybe AZ will see the light and put away her crayons.
Posted by: alan at May 20, 2004 09:57 AM (dWDWo)
4
It never fails to stun me how, in their desire to destroy Bush, they would happily condemn the world to tyranny.
I didn't link to Zerb or the Star so odds are excellent she won't read this, but it would be an honour for her to hate me.
Posted by: Debbye at May 20, 2004 06:07 PM (VNDmp)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 18, 2004
UNSCAM and Canada
May 18 - Devastating summary of the connection between UNSCAM, the Desmarais family and PM Paul Martin in the
Canada Free Press Cover Story (short-life link) starting with these:
First came the shock that United Nations Secretary General Kofi AnnanÂ’s son, Kojo was connected to the ill-fated program. According to the New York Post On-Line edition, family members of former UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali are officers of a Panamanian-registered company in which Benon Sevan, a UN assistant Secretary General, appointed to administer the oil-for-food program, had a connection.
The Post said it got its information about the Boutros-Ghali connection from Claude Hankes-Drielsma, a British businessman and advisor to the Iraqi governing council.
Claude Hankes-Drielsma is the man who retained the accounting firm KMPG to audit the UN Oil for Food program which was key to forcing Annan to agree to first an internal and then an independent inquiry on the program.
Just weeks ago, Boutros-Ghali was awarded the prestigious Order of Canada. Only nine foreigners have been so honoured, and even as the former UN Secretary General was receiving the award, some Canadian officials were calling it "strange" because the Rwandan genocide happened under his watch as UN Secretary General.
Remember Romeo Dallaire?It was under Boutros-GhaliÂ’s direction that the UN 420-page Our Global Neighbourhood, which produced the blueprint for global governance, was published.
When Boutros-Ghali left the UN, he went on to head the Francophonie, the organization of French-speaking nations.
It gets worse.
Canadians are also said to have made oil deals with Saddam, and ties with the Canadian Company involved go all the way up to Prime Minister Paul MartinÂ’s office.
The involvement of Arthur Millholland is unproven; Martin ties to the
Desmarais family is common knowledge.
In the Canadian connection, itÂ’s a man called Paul Desmaris (sic). Desmaris is the largest shareholder and director of TotalFinaElf, the largest corporation in France, which held tens of billions of dollars in contracts with the deposed regime of Saddam Hussein.
Martin replaced Prime Minister Jean Chretien last December. ChretienÂ’s daughter, France is married to Andre Desmaris, son of Paul Desmaris.
Martin maintains powerful UN connections through AnnanÂ’s special UN advisor Maurice Strong. In fact, Strong, who also happens to be the architect of the Kyoto Protocol, hired Martin in the 1960s to work for Paul Desmaris Sr.
According to respected Financial Post columnist Diane Francis, "In 1974, Desmaris made Martin president of Canada Steamship Lines and then in 1981, he made him spectacularly rich by selling the company to him and a partner for $180 million. MartinÂ’s shipping company is estimated to be worth about $424 million, making him the 63rd richest person in Canada."
Shortly after his arrival in the Prime MinisterÂ’s office, Martin gave the company to his three sons.
The connection between Martin and Desmarais has never been in dispute, but utter the magic word
Halliburton to stimulate the "no blood for oil" folks up here, not TotalFinaElf.
But imagine these business connections happened in the USA. But of course you don't have to imagine, because we've been subjected to the phrases "Bush's oil buddies" and "Cheney and his former company Halliburton" relentlessly. Why do Canada's prime ministers get a free pass?
I just don't get Canadian politics or the media. Except for the occasional Diane Francis column in the Financial Post, and to echo a National Post column on this theme by Elizabeth Nickson last January (no permalinks to the original source) this is a story that seemingly generates no interest or outrage.
I'm sorry to say this, but this is perhaps the Great Divide between Americans and Canadians. I'm at a loss to explain it, and maybe I'm wrong, but I just can't imagine that these kinds of business relationships would be ignored by either the media or the electorate in the USA.
Americans are not always that well informed either. Here I am getting increasingly concerned about Bremer's obstruction of the IGC invesigation of UNSCAM, an investigation about which few Americans are even aware (unless they read the NY Post, Wall Street Journal or Washington Times. Or are FNC viewers.)
Roger Simon has an explanation for Bremer's obstruction - of sorts.
Via Instapundit, who has an ouch-worthy conclusion.
Friends of Saddam also linked to this item, and has a category for Canadian connections to UNSCAM.
Posted by: Debbye at
03:54 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 719 words, total size 5 kb.
1
What you don't get is that Canadians don't go for the type of smear tactics that are so prevelent in US politics. There is no connection between the UN oil for food scandal and the PM--either Chretien or Martin--despite the right whinger's attempts to paint one via guilt by association. This type of nonsense always backfires and ends up doing more damage to the side perpetrating it and it's showing in the polls.
Posted by: Robert McClelland at May 18, 2004 12:48 PM (xZPp5)
2
What might damage Martin is this growing evidence of his old boys attitude and connections that contradict the picture he was trying to paint of his new way of governing.
The Conservatives and the NDP can show that they don't have this baggage that Martin has after his years and years in the power circles. Harper is an establishment outsider and Layton comes from an activist background.
Posted by: Don at May 18, 2004 02:48 PM (7pt/q)
3
Well, Robert, other than the cretin's daughter and where her husband's income comes from. And who he is, and what Montreal Power corp owns....
Posted by: Sandy P at May 18, 2004 03:12 PM (HY+aw)
4
Let's face facts. Canadians are content with their bland position in life and expect their leaders to lead them astray (Politics, Bre-ex, Nortel to name a few). Everyone fights their battles for them and funds their medi-care. The Canadian news is filled with UN-American stories. Canadian news commentators pontificate about the world as though they actually had a role to play in it. Heaven help any "individual" who disagrees with the "collective" views of UN-named spokesmen of "world opinion".
Being one of the one-in-four Saskatchewan residents who would like to join the USA, I would like to say God Bless the USA. Our fore-fathers who built this country would clearly side with the USA. Unfortuantely, their children only want to behave as children (Lord of the Flies).
Posted by: Larry at May 18, 2004 03:22 PM (qaDYT)
5
Apparently, Debbye, you subscribe to that old adage(revised version) - Where there's smoke, there isn't fire. Hope your house is equipped w/ alarms and sprinklers.
Posted by: Jean Valjean at May 18, 2004 03:30 PM (3nn57)
6
Actually, I susbscribe to a couple of adages.
One of them concerns stones and glass houses!
So no, I'm not arguing for any presumed superiority of the US or Canada but something different: both countries must depend on an active and informed electorate and the role of the news media in that endeavour is fairly self-evident.
It is entirely possible, though, that Old Media up here (and down there) is just plain lazy.
However, one thing I do believe Canada needs is a firm, articulate understanding of what constitutes a conflict of interest.
I should have mentioned the Western Standard as a new publication that shows great promise and, because regionalism is another plague in this country, can do a great deal to pull this country together.
Bottom lines: are Ontarians are as aware of political events in Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan as they are in Washington, DC or California?
When we invoke NAFTA and call ourselves North Americans, do we remember that Mexico is a partner?
Closer to home: there are some things receiving little attention that actually concern Canadians, such as the upcoming sell-off of the remaining government shares of Petro-Canada, so Power Corp. should be under the microscope here as much as Halliburton is down south.
If I was going for the jugular, though, I'd point to the growing number of media types who land cushy government appointed positions, and I probably should have given the government points for not letting CBC side-step whistle-blower protection.
Unfortuantely, I was a humanities major, not an economics or business major, so my toolbag is pretty sparse for understanding and posting lucidly on those matters.
Posted by: Debbye at May 19, 2004 03:59 AM (F4O66)
7
Unfortunately it is very hard to point out to canadians how corrupt their governments are because they consider themselves morally superior. The first reflex canadians have when you point out business relationships, corrupt scandals, etc...they automatically shoutout with rigor "yea but.. what about the Americans!"
As for oil and former PM's this goes back to the PM Trudeau's family who had investments in BP and GULF oil franchises before magically being bought up by the Canadian government to become PetroCanada. (he was a very richman when he left politics for retirement)
Also, Trudeau after stepping down as PM sat on the Desmarais' board of directors for Powercorp at 300k a year in the mid 90's..it's no secret check the Powercorp 1995-96 financial reports!
As for Jean Chrétien, he is working with the Desmarais these days and for a Russian oil company as Special Adviser to the company for International Relations, check it out http://www.petrokazakhstan.com/ (February 03, 2004 News release)..
...by the way this company has pipelines to Iran, China but no pipelines in Iraq but does have a proposed pipeline to Afghanistan!
nope no guilt by association here I guess, not in Canada, Yea but what about those Americans!
Posted by: glaplante at May 19, 2004 11:08 AM (jVbI0)
8
The prairie provinces share a great deal with the prairie states. European emigration to the central part of North America was an early form of globalization. For many communities who re-located from Europe to North America, many early adopters re-located to the northern prairie states where land was free. Later community members came to Canada where they homesteaded. The end result is that the prairies share a common heritage and common values, not to mention family. This is the way many prairie people view "regionalism". I suspect the BC-Cascadia concept is similar to those people living in that region.
Canada as a country is a concept that is continuing to evolve. Government/Business Corruption causes many to look at options as their fore-fathers left Europe to get away from this exact same thing. Pontificating that Canada (outside the context of it's relation with the United States) is a great country is something that the world places little value in. Compare Canada with Sweden (both good countries). What is the impact of Sweden in world events?
Posted by: Larry at May 19, 2004 12:12 PM (qaDYT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 17, 2004
Pizza wars
May 17 - M'kay, I suppose it is a free trade issue, but for pizza lovers its also a quality issue, as in Delissio tastes a lot better than McCain's. Pizza Pizza just got my business back. (
Canada turns up heat on frozen pizza)
Posted by: Debbye at
10:27 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.
May 15, 2004
3 arrested in Montreal Jewish school fire-bombing
May 15 -
Jews relieved after firebombing arrests (and, I suspect, quite a number of non-Jews.)
MONTREAL'S JEWISH community expressed relief yesterday after police said they had arrested five people in the widely condemned firebombing at a school last month. Police picked up four men aged 18 to 20 and a woman in her early 30s but gave no details on their ethnic background.
According to
this at the Western Standard blog, two men were released and 3 held: Sleman Elmerhebi and Simon Zogheib. Also charged for being an accomplice after the fact is the mother of Mr Elmerhebi, Rouba Fahd Elmerhebi. (Update: more details
here.)
Via Norman's Spectator, a Globe and Mail article here:
Radio-Canada reported that the four young men are of Middle Eastern origin.
"It's not over. We're expecting more arrests," said a Montreal police spokesman, Constable Ian Lafrenière. Montreal police had been under tremendous pressure to solve the case, which was broadly condemned by politicians and religious leaders of all stripes.
"The more people involved, the more troubling it is. With five people being arrested together, there was obviously some kind of organization," said Jeffrey Boro, president of the Canadian Jewish Congress in Quebec. Mr. Boro, a criminal lawyer, said the possibility of further arrests was even more worrisome. "Five is troubling. More than five becomes alarming."
Posted by: Debbye at
09:03 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 233 words, total size 2 kb.
1
More than 5 becomes alarming? Possible organization?
You think???
Posted by: Sandy P at May 16, 2004 11:35 PM (HY+aw)
2
LOL and (sob)(sniff) - I know what you mean, Sandy. I know what you mean.
Posted by: Debbye at May 17, 2004 10:53 PM (uAsAH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Terror watch in Canada
May 15 - Khalid Khawaja, who is self-described as a friend of Osama bin Laden's, says
Canada deserves bombing because it is a friend of the USA and Canada was mean to the Khadrs (which is grimly ironic, given that many Canadians would say the government was far too helpful.) The article quotes Khawaja:
"Look at these Canadians. They have millions and millions of dollars to fight against Muslims, to send their troops, to send their weapons, and all of them put together, they have objections to giving treatment to this 14 year-old-boy who has been a victim of your terrorism."
This man is behind on the news. We spent those millions and millions of dollars in something called Adscam, and it definitely had nothing to do with fighting anyone, including Muslims, and misplaced some more millions on the Gun Registry, which is about destroying our ability to fight anyone. As for funding of the Canadian Forces ... I only wish the government here
was actually funding them instead of consigning them to death by slow starvation.
Would he feel better if he knew that a chunk of the Defence budget went to purchase two Executive Jets for Chretien back when he was Prime Minister? No?
Bin Laden first publicly encouraged attacks against Canada in a statement broadcast on Nov. 12, 2002. In March, 2004, an al-Qaeda manual posted on the Internet ranked Canadians as the fifth most important targets.
But al-Qaeda and its ideological theorists have provided little explanation as to why. Canada did not send troops to Iraq, its foreign policy is not particularly pro-Israel and Ottawa has not been overly aggressive in fighting terror.
The writer is still looking for reasons. That's not a shot at Stewart Bell, in fact far from it, because I too instinctively wonder "Why?" whenever I read about most anything. Granted, I've concluded the answer to be "Because they're evil" whenever al Qaeda comes up, but that was
after I asked the question.
To be clear, I think that our willingness to ask Why? is one of the strengths of Western civilization, even though it does at times hamper our ability to respond adequately to what Ghost of a Flea once termed the morally insane.
A top Canadian terrorism expert said Mr. Khawaja's comments were typical of the way al-Qaeda followers view the world, as divided between two conflicting religious and cultural camps: Dar ul-Islam, the perfect Muslim world, and Dar ul-Harb, the immoral rest of the world.
I don't think women's rights and gay marriage exist in the perfect al Qaeda world, but we musn't forget that Straight White Men are the real enemy.
"Canada, as a secular democratic society, is by definition assigned to Dar ul-Harb. From the perspective of al-Qaeda and associated Islamic militants, it is incumbent upon Muslims to wage a jihad, a holy war, against Dar ul-Harb in order to destroy its perceived evils and transform those societies into Dar ul-Islam," said Professor Martin Rudner.
"According to this doctrine, Canada is a religiously sanctioned target for terrorism, suicide bombing and political violence," said Prof. Rudner, Director of the Canadian Centre of Intelligence and Security Studies at Carleton University's Norman Paterson School of International Affairs.
A Canadian intelligence report written shortly after bin Laden first urged attacks against Canada said the country was singled out "in view of its support of the U.S." The more recent al-Qaeda manual explains only that Canada is a "Christian" country. (My emphasis)
So, Canadian Members of Parliament and an aide to then PM Chretien insulted our national leaders, poll after poll has indicated Canadians think we Americans are too arrogant, too patriotic and too religious, and that they hate our president and consider him too religious; in short, the pollsters have done verything possible to indicate that Canada is not a friend of the United States and is suspicious of Christianity, yet Canada is still on the short list as a terrorist target.
According to a translation of an article written by Abu Ayman al-Hilali, a senior al-Qaeda leader and ideologist, the United States, Britain, France, Italy, Canada, Germany, and Australia are "enemies" and attacks against their civilians are justified. Since Western governments are engaged in a war against Islam, he argued, the civilian voters who elect those governments cannot be considered non-combatants and are legitimate targets for terrorists.
Three and a half of the nations mentioned are in the Anglosphere! Read the whole thing to catch the playing of the ubiquitous Victim Card.
Canadian pollsters and the media have managed to alienate Americans while failing to appease Islamofascists. Now that's nuanced politics, and, to paraphrase Lincoln, proves that you can alienate all of the people some of the time! (An older poll revealed that Canadians were confident that, if Canada was attacked, America would rush to defend her. So far as I know, no similar poll has ever been conducted in the USA.)
By the way, observant readers will note that the person interviewed bears the same last name as the Ottawa resident arrested on terrorism charges last March, Mohammed Momin Khawaja, but there is nothing to indicate there is any connection between the two men so please don't ask.
Sorry, I know I'm coming off as really cranky in this post, but it's only because I got even more cranky after reading this.
(Links from Ghost of a Flea's post Appeasement in the Western Standard blog.)
Posted by: Debbye at
06:35 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 910 words, total size 6 kb.
1
Cranky, huh? Me too. It's almost become the normal state of mind. Here we go again repeating the mistakes of the past. In the 20th century, apologists for communism and stalinism and outright fellow travellers did all they could to destroy the free world from within, and left millions of humans around the world to suffer and die under arbitrary totalitarian rule. In the 21st century the same people and their deformed offspring are working on behalf of the islamofascist obscurantists. In Canada we have a whole generation that has been indoctrinated into moral relativism to the point where we provide public funding for the health care of those who would kill us and enslave our children. Here we cower on the finges of North America, trying so hard not to be noticed by the monster in the closet. Boo!
Ok, so it is a disjointed rant. Call me cranky, just don't call me late for the jihad.
Posted by: keith at May 16, 2004 10:03 AM (xfdnu)
2
Here we cower on the finges of North America, trying so hard not to be noticed by the monster in the closet. Boo!
Thanks, Keith. You really did make me feel better!
I don't know whether to laugh or cry these days. I feel as though we are poised at the edge of something, and I'm holding my breath.
Yes, I specialize in disconnected, rambling thoughts.
Posted by: Debbye at May 16, 2004 05:34 PM (EHJHr)
3
You are late, Keith.
Jihad American-style started almost 3 years ago.
Posted by: Sandy P at May 16, 2004 11:37 PM (HY+aw)
4
I was earlier told that Natiomal Post does create sensations and exploit the situations, but some how I did think that Mr. Stewart Bell is a decent and professional journalist, but I am myself astonished to see that like few other western media National Post has fabricated the facts and had certainly demenised my person and sabotaged the very cause of this interview.
However I do wish to clarify that I am not a part of any Al-qaida nor I have to do anything with any Al-Qaida. The only time I knew Qaida was when I was working with Royal Saudi Airforce we used to call our base as Qaida. I never even heard of any Al-Qaida till the time I heard it from the western media. I have never met anybody in my life who claimed that he is from al Qaida.
Terrorism is one of the worst thing one can do in this world. My faith is that if you kill one man is as if you kill the whole humanity. If I have a choice of saving one person from getting killed than to save the holiest place of muslims I am supposed to save the person. If I have a choice to kill an innocent or to get killed I dont have to think but get killed, how can a person like me can say that canada should be bombed. The whole interview was recorded on a T.V. camera you can see that I never said a word of what the newspaper has put up the head line.
I have called Stewart Bell and he told me that the headline and the introduction was not from him but the management did it.
I shall expect that National Post may publish the correction and a suitable oppology for demenising my person.
I am always available for any more clarification through my mail address or through tel. no. ++92-333-5121010.
thank you
regards
Khalid
The purpose of this interview was only to understand the view point of the demenised side, and tried to bridge the gaps between east and west and not to create any more hatered
Posted by: KHALID KHAWAJA at May 18, 2004 01:29 PM (//R17)
5
Canada is not worth defending.
Posted by: Karen Kamm at May 19, 2004 12:50 AM (PFbhH)
6
To the person who signed himself as Khalid Khawaja, I'm referring your post over to Stewart Bell. The article didn't refer to a taped interview.
Karen, one thing I've learned about Canada is that everything I know is actually about Ontario. But of course Canada is worth defending, but hopefully by Canadians!
But Canadians haven't had their Sept. 11 moment, and my hope is that they don't need one.
Posted by: Debbye at May 19, 2004 04:10 AM (F4O66)
7
I am not the person who signed as Khalid Khawaja, but I am khalid Khawaja who was interviewed by Stewart Bell on last Friday and the whole interview was recorded by a video camera. My post should be refered to teh Editor as I have already talked with Stewart Bell and he agrees with me that that misleading head line has been given and my comments regarding the possible reactions of the people have been put up as my stand point and I have been projected as Al Qaida. Like most other western media a false threat has been fabricated by the news paper. My basic purpose is always to bridge the gap between two sides and try to make a po[nt where the real problem lies, not to send a hate message. I personally have a high opinion about Canadians I dont hesitate saying that the role of Canadians is far better that my own government and probably most of the muslim countries, I did point out the flaws in the system and taht is all. But all my good will has been portrayed as bad will and hate which is certainly not fair. If the the media is doing this with somebody available and vocal, what they must be doing with teh people who have been deprived to express themselves at all.
kindly take this matter seriously amd adopt teh corrective measure and dont prove to be doing yellow journalism.
best regards
Khalid
Posted by: KHALID KHAWAJA at May 19, 2004 08:33 AM (ExZ7Z)
8
No offense, sir, but a hotmail email address is not exactly proof of identity.
I haven't heard from Mr. Bell himself that there were errors in the article, and given that the article bears his by-line, he and he alone is the authority on that subject.
Posted by: Debbye at May 21, 2004 10:52 PM (PELMg)
9
It is very strange Stewart told me himself that teh headlinewas notwritten by him an dhe himself said tahtit was in appropriate and he has sent a few mauls to the effect and day before yesterday he told me that the Newspaper is giving a retraction-correction.
Please take this matter seriously and urgently as your newpaper has made a false allegation on me giving a threat to bomb Canada on behalf of Al-Qaida, making me liable to be shot or arrested by Canadian or American government. The article also said that I am helping Al-Qaida families attacked in 1998. which is also false as I am not at all helping any Al-QAIDA family as I have never met any body in my life who claimed taht he or she belongs to Al-Qaida. I only filed a law suit on behalf of teh innocent victims who had nothing to do with Qaida or Usama and were murdered by the American government by the cruise missiles in 1998. I took a reporter (GEORGE CRILE) of CBS 60 minutes and he has all teh records of teh places and even the families who had nothing to do with any Qaida.
If the retraction correction does not come up by tomorrow as promised I shall have no choice but to proceed legally against the news papaper.
Kindly accept yout mistake if it is not done intentioanlly and give the retraction correction.
gest regards
Khalid
Posted by: KHALID kHAWAJA at May 23, 2004 05:38 AM (//R17)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 11, 2004
Andy Bradsell
May 11 - June, Andy's aunt, sent some pictures that I've posted at the bottom of the page
here. One is of Andy and the family, and the other is a wonderful picture of Hunter.
Posted by: Debbye at
09:16 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 39 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hi June,
I too read all these posts weeks ago. I don't even know what to say. I feel so awful for your whole family. What a terrible loss. But this site concentrates on the positive. The positive influence Andy had on many lives!! I feel so fortunate that I got a chance to see him again in recent years especially at Sams wedding with all the kids in tow and his beautiful wife Tasha. It was amazing to see what a remarkable man he had become. To see him with all his children was awe inspiring. Andy was truly happy.
I have spoken to Sam quite often and I am so happy to have her have this wonderful new life to look forward too. I think it helps alot with what you are all going through.
You were more than an aunt, you were always there a permanent fixture in the Bradsell house. Even with all the distance you were still such a huge part of the family. It is amazing how such a close family does not need the confines of proximity to stay so intune with each other.
I wish you all the best and pray for your loss.
Take care my thoughts are with you all.
Leigh Ann Merritt
Posted by: Leigh Ann at May 17, 2004 01:23 PM (UM+pp)
2
Leigh Ann, I took the liberty of forwarding your message to June.
Andy Bradsell had quite an impact on a lot of people. That is the ultimate testimonial on how a man (or woman) chose to live.
Posted by: Debbye at May 17, 2004 11:30 PM (uAsAH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 03, 2004
Don Cherry, Greatest Canadian
May 3 - The movement to have
Grapes greatest Canadian (?) made today's
Toronto Sun in a brief article by Brett Clarkson.
Of course, the question "Why?" is harder to put into words, but I think part of the reason is because Don Cherry unabashedly represents the Canadian "Everyman."
He's honest (to a fault), knows right from wrong, is loyal to friend and country, and goes to great lengths to teach youngsters not only hockey skills but good sportsmanship and decent behaviour on and off the ice.
He is a staunch friend to our soldiers, fireman and policeman.
He wears his heart on his sleeve (and on his hats, ties, and jackets.)
The webpage for nominations is here, and Meatriarchy has updates on the drive here and here.
Posted by: Debbye at
08:05 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 136 words, total size 1 kb.
1
There was supposed to be a quote from me plus a link to my blog in the article but it didn't appear on the on-line version.
Guess I got lost on the cutting room floor.
Posted by: The Meatriarchy at May 03, 2004 09:11 PM (cYRBs)
2
He's also a boorish loudmouth like you are, Dubbya. No wonder Americans idolise loutish idiots like Don Cherry. It permits them to use terms like "Everyman". Go to hell, Cherry...and go to hell, Dubbya.
Posted by: Americans go home at May 03, 2004 10:23 PM (sBmfT)
3
Thanks for demonstrating the Canadian values of tolerance and understanding that have made our country so famous.
I guess you wont be serving on any "peacekeeping" missions soon?
Posted by: The Meatriarchy at May 04, 2004 08:23 AM (cYRBs)
4
I think Cherry's a great nom and a great man. Everyone down here in Hockeytown loves him to a fault (and despite them).
Posted by: Miss O'Hara at May 04, 2004 11:00 AM (qmL8y)
5
Cherry honest? The guy is either an idiot or he's a liar.
He uses his platform on Coach's Corner to carry out vindictive and slanderous attacks on people he doesn't like.
He's prejudiced, bigoted and hypocritical.
The sooner the aging queen is gone from HNIC the better.
Posted by: BlackRedGold at May 04, 2004 11:10 AM (+iQbv)
6
Using his his platform to attack people he doesn't like...
Gee that has never happened on the CBC before!!
At least everone is clear that Don is expressing an opinion. He is not being dressed up as "news".
Posted by: The Meatriarchy at May 04, 2004 11:15 AM (cYRBs)
7
Debbye, don't let that twerp who signed under the name "Americans Go Home" get to you. As a committed centrist, the mayor of Accordion City and a guy dating a lovely American lady who's considerably more liberal than I, you are certainly welcome here.
I don't always agree with The Coach (I think he's dead wrong about helmets), but he's always entertaining. I'll endorse him for Greatest Canadian Ever!
Posted by: Joey deVilla at May 05, 2004 12:09 AM (MDgiQ)
8
Ouch Debbye! I certainly hope that the above anti-American diatribes were written by some sorry, lonely troll. Unfortunately, such idiots do represent a too-large minority in Canada. Everyone knows that the best way for thuggish, lying and intellectually challenged politicians, who make up the bulk of the Liberal Party of Canada, always relie as a last resort on the old us-against-them routine (e.g. Argentinian despots and the Falklands war, Greek despots and Cypress). Looks like you're It! Check out the campaign ads leaked by the Libs recently. No to AMERICAN-STYLE health care. No to AMERICAN AGRESSION in Iraq. Ad nauseum, so to speak. Sort of makes you the new Jews of Canada, I guess. As a (no longer so proud) Canadian, I offer my apologies, for what its worth. AND, I went and voted for Don as Greatest Canadian. Frankly, this whole Greatest Canadian thing is rubbish and also too revealing of our national emotional insecurities. Must have been dreamt up by a couple of ADM's during one of their intellectual gatherings at Tim Hortons. I went and voted for Don because I wanted to make my own, small contribution to defeating the pre-ordained choice of Pierre Trudeau, whom I consider to be our nation's greatest tragedy. But, I do not believe for a second that, even if 20 million Canadians voted for Cherry, that the CBC would ever let us find out. One last thing, to the idiots that wrote the diatribes above, let me know where and when, and I will take great pleasure in smashing your mouth.
Posted by: keith at May 05, 2004 11:28 AM (xfdnu)
9
The thing that bothers most people about Cherry is that he's such a proponent of "Canadian-style" hockey, which is being slowly diluted by the influx of European players. A quick look at the history of hockey shows how different the game is here than in Europe. Canadian hockey spawned from lacrosse, one of the most physical (and to some, violent) games on earth, and is more offense-based. Since lacrosse is unknown outside North America, European hockey is most influenced by soccer (or football, if you prefer) which is far more defense-based, and has a disgusting amount of "diving," which has found its way into hockey as well (Mike Ribiero). While the Canadian game was based on body-checking, toughness and grit, the European game is based on finesse, speed and a horrible amount of slashing and other stickwork.
When Cherry talks of visors, and says "most of the guys wearing them are European and French guys," he's statistically and substantially correct. When he says that the improvements in equipment are actually leading to more injuries, he's also right, because the better protection afforded the players makes it easier to withstand a slash; the officials let most stickwork go, unless a particularly viscious chop on an unprotected area (wrist, ankle, back) causes a devastating injury. Mandatory visors would lead to more cheap shots, as well as the eventual extinction of fighting. To people who understand the game, fighting is the only thing keeping would-be slashers from being far more viscous. Marty McSorely, regardless of the Brashear incident, is the only reason that Wayne Gretzky was never taken out - the knowledge that Marty was waiting to break your face open on the next shift if you touched the Great One was far more of a deterrent than a two minute penalty.
Thus, the politically-correct bleeding hearts hate Cherry because he stands against the type of people that Canadians are trying so hard to mimic; left-wing European-style socialists that think people should be forced to do things "for their own good" while Cherry defends the right that they are all so afraid of - the right to make the best choice for yourself. I voted for Don Cherry as the greatest Canadian, and I wouldn't hesitate to vote for him should he ever run for public office. Hell, I'd move to his riding just to vote for the guy. Go Don!
Posted by: Nik at May 05, 2004 02:46 PM (u2RxE)
10
Don Cherry is my best friends cousin his name is Joey Bishop.I want Don Cherrys truck its pimp.I am a huge fan of Hockey Night In Canada PLEASE BRING IT BACK!!!! thumbs up!!!!
Posted by: cody reynolds at December 09, 2004 12:39 PM (3oedz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 01, 2004
The U.S. and Canada on the U.N.
May 1 - Appears UNSCAM
isn't going unnoticed by the Bush administration. Glad
Jack's Newswatch caught these while I was putting out fires yesterday:
'Hang' U.N. Oil Ra$cals:
April 30, 2004 -- WASHINGTON - The State Department's No. 2 official said yesterday that those guilty of corruption in the U.N. oil-for-food program "ought to hang."
What did I
tell you? Give 'em enough rope ...
What I didn't expect was for Canadian PM Paul Martin to distance himself from the U.N., especially so soon after Kofi Annan addressed Parliament to a warm and admiring audience, and the Davos conference where Martin said:
Annan will be the first secretary general of the UN to address Parliament in the organization's 59-year existence. He was invited to the capital before U.S. President George W. Bush, something that Martin said he did deliberately to show "that Canada has a very important role to play in the world."
Yeah, I never got the logic of that statement either.
And what about the U.N. University for Peace that is to be installed in Toronto?
Read this and this and see if you can figure it out.
Maybe Martin took flip-flop lessons from Sen. Kerry ...
May 3 - 13:47: Roger Simon and commenters have more on Martin's speech here.
Posted by: Debbye at
09:52 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 223 words, total size 2 kb.
92kb generated in CPU 0.0211, elapsed 0.0986 seconds.
72 queries taking 0.0862 seconds, 216 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.