October 24, 2005
Reactions to the Mehlis Report
Oct. 24 - I wish I could report on official Canadian reaction to the Mehlis Report but thus far there hasn't been any. The rest of the world isn't waiting for Canada, though, and Detlev Mehlis, who was commissioned by the U.N. to investigate the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, will be addressing the United Nations Security Council tomorrow. It seems likely that the imposition of sanctions on the Assad government will, at the very least, be brought up (
U.S., Britain press for action against Syria) :
Diplomats at the United Nations and in Washington said U.S. and French officials have been talking with Russia and other nations about anti-Syria resolutions to put before the Security Council, including the possibility of punitive economic sanctions.
Seems France is still on board, which is good (however deeply I may distrust them.)
It's not really so surprising that Canadian officials haven't commented yet, especially as you'd never know the Mehlis Report was all that damning if you read the CBC webpage today (nor would you find a link to an earlier story on that report.) But you can trust the CBC to emphasize the anti-American element in the following story: pro-government demonstration in Syria today:
In a country where protests are rare, a rally in support of the Syrian government virtually shut down central Damascus Monday.
Among the hundreds of thousands of people at the rally – and a similar event in the northern city of Aleppo – there were government employees let off work for the occasion and students released from classes with the government's blessing.
Imagine: government blessed demonstrations! I haven't seen anything like it in that region since Saddam ruled Iraq. (Do reporters in Syria travel with "minders?" Just asking.)
They chanted anti-American slogans to protest a United Nations report released last week that said Syria and Lebanon played roles in the assassination of former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri on Feb. 14. (Emphasis added)
They dislike the findings of a U.N. report written by a German so they chant anti-American slogans. I could be really, really wrong but I am beginning to wonder if this might have been a "staged" event.
The CBC fills us in on more items from the report:
The same report also scolded Syria for its less-than-full co-operation with the United Nations investigation.
[I deleted intervening paragraphs which are not about the report's contents but the CBC report is copied in full in the extended entry for your reading pleasure.]
Syria vigorously denies the allegations in the U.N. report, dismissing its contents as politicized gossip.
The CBC does not report that Detlev Mehlis concluded that
leading members of the Syrian and Lebanese governments were involved in the assassination nor does it note that
last-minute alterations suppressed the names of several leading Syria officials (including members of Bashir Assad's immediate family) raising suspicions that Kofi Annan had broke his pledge not to interfere. In fact, the CBC doesn't even mention that a computer "gaffe" enabled recipients of the report to retrieve the deleted names.
Imperative No. 1 at the CBC is to suppress any news that makes the U.N. look bad or, failing that, downplay it. (Imperative No. 2 is to hype news that makes the U.S.A. look bad; note the lead picture on their Indepth Lebanon page!) That's part of the reason why some of us are somewhat cynical when CBC reporters are named to the Senate or appointed Governor-General. When your job as a reporter includes tainting the news or even failing to report the news, The News Canadians Trust isn't very trustworthy and neither are its reporters.
Although the news report says that there have been calls for U.N. sanctions, no specific country was named (the article does quote President Bush's response to the report, though.) I think it odd that the CBC completely ignored the involvement of both the French and the British not only because of the shared British and French heritage of Canada but also because the two countries are permanent members of the UNSC. Some might think that when 3 out of 5 permanent members are attempting to build a U.N.-based response against Syria that such an event would be newsworthy.
Same old, same old. For the CBC, it's always All. About. America. and not about, say, the Lebanese (or the Iraqis, for that matter) unless it's about a Syrian response which is All. About. America.
The CBC was so anxious to be even-handed that it didn't even mention the response in Lebanon to the report, unlike the AP, Michael Totten and Expat Yank Robert (and the latter has posted some very moving photos of the commemorative ceremonies at Hafrik's grave that were held last Friday.)
14:25: This CTV report on the Syrian demonstrations contains considerably more information about the Mehlis report although no names of suspected perpetrators are mentioned nor is the revelation that the report was altered to removed key names.
There's also a sobering analysis over at Canada Free Press by J. Grant Swank, Jr.: Syria: Murder & mayhem, but who cares? in which he expresses why he believes the Syrians will not be rising up to oust Assad. He makes several good points and, when you come right down to it, this isn't really about internal matters in Syria but that country's behaviour in Lebanon over the past few decades as well as their support of terrorist groups that attack Israel and (I suspect) Iraq.
more...
Posted by: Debbye at
01:15 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1165 words, total size 9 kb.
1
Do reporters in Syria travel with "minders?"
---
Whether they know it or not, I'm certain they do - the official ties between CNN and Saddam were an exception.
Posted by: Jay at October 24, 2005 10:57 PM (PIbeE)
2
Hi Jay! Nice shot at CNN (and they deserve every bit of it.)
I know that Iran assigns minders but am not absolutely sure about Syria. I also wonder (belatedly) if Syria requires that reporters submit their stories for approval before they are allowed to file them with their papers back home as did the Ministry of Information under Saddam.
I have my suspicions, of course ...
Posted by: Debbye at October 25, 2005 07:34 AM (rDcWQ)
3
The point is that Syria, Iran and others are fomenting all this mindless ideologue friction by remote control in others back yards.
We need to see combatants follow a weapons shipping route back to the countries feeding all this discord. '3s TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 27, 2005 03:15 PM (rmMzv)
4
Any of you ever been to Syria?
Posted by: Putin at October 28, 2005 11:52 PM (xIUY7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 21, 2005
Another one bites the dust
Oct. 21 - On the one hand researchers claim that
working women are too stressed to to add frozen vegetables to boiling water, and on the other hand someone who said that proper child-raising and rising to the top ranks in the advertising industry are incompatible goals has been forced to resign (
Top ad guru quits amid sexism furor.)
Mr. [Neil] French confirmed yesterday that he has quit as worldwide creative director of WPP Group PLC, the world's second-largest marketing company where he oversaw famous agency networks including Ogilvy & Mather, JWT, Young & Rubicam and Grey Worldwide.
At least the center of this storm isn't backing down:
But Mr. French -- famous both for his brilliant work as a copy writer and his politically incorrect views -- stands by controversial comments he made in response to a question from the audience at a Toronto event sponsored by ad industry Web site ihaveanidea.org. The comments circled around the world after being reported last week in The Globe and Mail's Nobody's Business column.
"The woman asked why there are so few women creative directors. I said because you can't commit yourself to the job. And everyone who doesn't commit themselves fully to the job is crap at it . . ," Mr. French said yesterday in an interview.
"You can't be a great creative director and have a baby and keep spending time off every time your kids are ill. You can't do the job. Somebody has to do it and the guy has to do it the same way that I've had to spend months and months flying around the world and not seeing my kid. You think that's not a sacrifice? Of course it's a sacrifice. I hate it. But that's the job and that's what I do in order to keep my family fed."
One may not like his message, but that doesn't make him wrong.
Posted by: Debbye at
07:30 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 323 words, total size 2 kb.
1
It is unforgivable when someone is forced from office because his take on a situation clashes with the current flavour of the month.
Political correctness carries the chilling effect of a dictatorship.
Posted by: frank at October 23, 2005 07:56 PM (D77K9)
2
It is unforgivable that someone is forced to resign because his opinion on a matter is misconstrued as possibly sexist.
Political correctness is a form of dictatorship.
Posted by: frank at October 23, 2005 08:22 PM (D77K9)
3
Galileo would find all this familiar, Frank.
Let's see: the response when one questions orthodox thinking is that one is met with outrage, is pressured to recant, and is forced to resign.
Yep, sounds more like a dictatorship than the "open, diverse society that values ideas" that we hear so much about.
Posted by: Debbye at October 24, 2005 09:12 AM (yegQF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Canadians in Iraq
Oct. 21 - I must be getting old because I thought this was already well known but evidently the issue is that the knowledge has received official confirmation! Or maybe the issue is that Canadians participating in the "insurgency" tends to minimize the claim that said "insurgency" is an Iraqi-based resistance.
Seems that according to the director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, James Judd, some Canadians are taking part in Iraqi insurgency. (Gasp!)
According to Keith Boag, the CBC's Ottawa bureau chief, the Prime Minister's Office was "flabbergasted" that such sensitive information could be released by the head of the spy agency. "They didn't know it was being spoken about publicly and for that they [the PMO] are very angry."
"The prime minister never comments on intelligence matters and they were under the impression that CSIS didn't either," said Boag.
Acknowledgment that Canadians are fighting in Iraq raises a number of questions, such as what will their status be if they decide to return to Canada.
You mean when they return here seeking health care after being wounded in action?
That issue has already been settled as has their legal status."It raises the longer-term question of what do they bode for the future?" Judd said.
I guess it's really nice that they are at least
considering the long-term ramifications but expecting action from this government? Uh, no, although there are those who are more than anxious to prosecute U.S. President George Bush under Canada's Criminal Code, and
a Vancouver court has lifted a publication ban on attempts to do just that:
The Kitsilano lawyer [Gail Davidson] got the ball rolling against Bush as soon as he set foot on Canadian soil for his November 30, 2004, visit. As a private citizen, she charged him with seven counts of counselling, aiding, and abetting torture at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and at CubaÂ’s Guantanamo Bay naval base. She had her charges accepted by a justice of the peace in Vancouver Provincial Court.
Bush faces prison time if the case goes to trial and he is found guilty.
On December 6, 2004, Davidson was at Provincial Court to fix a date for the process hearing. However, Provincial Court Judge William Kitchen promptly ordered a Straight reporter and other observers from the courtroom and cancelled the charges, declaring them a “nullity”. The meeting was deemed to be “in-camera” and Kitchen concluded immediately that Bush had diplomatic immunity during his two-day visit to Canada because he was a head of state.
You can read about the legal wranglings at the link. (I included it because I didn't didn't want anyone to think that Canadians are incapable of taking A Stand On Moral Issues.)
(Links via Neale News.)
Posted by: Debbye at
05:30 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 451 words, total size 3 kb.
1
This is all very interestng. A statement of principle more than anything. I do not see anything like a possibility here, however it is one way to illustrate a point.
More possible and closer to home, I was wondering.
I wonder how many of you got the Email today from Democracy watch?
Its a long rambling Email about returning ethics to government. Also the note touches upon global warning. There is mention of a cocktail party where Ralph Nader will speak.
Of cause when I first got into this thing, I was all enthusiastic.
There was mention of filling out a form and a link. The link went to hour.ca/news.
I began filling in the questions and further down there were privacy invading questions.
I went back and erased everything and took a look at Hour.ca . It's a site about living the high life in Montreal.
Why should I provide personal information to them, just because I thought Democracy watch was ok?
I have doubts about the whole gang now.
The Cocktail party with speaker Ralph Nader that Democracy Watch mentioned has a price tag of $185 per person.
Besides raising money, has Democracy watch done anything useful in Canada that you know of.
What about focus? Can D.W. clean up ethics in Ottawa while talking about global warming at the same time?
I am not slamming so much as wondering if they just really want to collect donations and not get their hands dirty?
Does any one really know? TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 21, 2005 11:35 PM (rmMzv)
2
The most mentally retarded, and traitorous act I have seen in my 77 plus years living and fighting for this Country as many members of my family have down through the years. Who the hell does Herr Martin and that shreeker retard McLennon think they are hymotising now? If Canadians were going off shore to kill the French, Herr Maztin would stay up all night designing legislation to stop it immediately. If there was any a move that postiviely proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that this Kanadian Furehor is a traitor to Anglo Canadians, and fully in bed with the Terrorists, what else has he to do.
How many big cheques is the Furehor getting from the 200,000 plus Tamils, and others in the Muslim community that are cheering his latest act of treachery?
The Opposition better show their mettle on this real soon, and DO SOMETHING even it was to ring the bells or boycott question Period which is a cruel joke anyway.
This is one Vet that the only consolation I can take from this is that the Canadian dead from past wars do not know what they died for, if they did, they would take up arms against their onw fascist Librano$ traitors, as thats exactly what they are in my eys.
God help us all, and God bless ALL of the troops. Have Canadians lost not only thier back bones but all sense of decency, are the fridges so full of beer that they just don't give a shit until it is time for their head to roll?
Beyond words, but not to be surprised with this gang of THUGS AND MENTALLY DERANGED MAFIOSA LIBRANO$. in Ottawa:
They will meet their comupance, either in this life or their MAKER, because these Librano thugs have a guaranteed ticket to hell.
Notice how this bombshell came out on a Friday? The thugs are hoping we will forget with our hangovers come Monday!
Stephen. Parksville. BC. WW 2 vet.
Posted by: stephenmichaud at October 22, 2005 12:49 AM (bxOjK)
3
By the way, there is hard evidence that the ice caps in the north are expanding from the latest data received from measurments taken by sattelite. I have said all along, anyone believe this horendous lie on so-called Globel warming, are only those that are on the take from a George Soros ilk group that are trying to break the economy of the United States,and Kanada and I am sick up to here, hearing about this BULLS-GAS!
Stehen. Parksville BC ww 2 vet.
Posted by: stephenmichaud at October 22, 2005 12:57 AM (bxOjK)
4
Ice caps come and ice caps go - just like species.
Back on topic, what happens when some of these Canadian "heros" return from Iraq and the US asks for their extradition and Canada refuses?
Would that make Canada a hostile country (harboring beligerents and all)?
Then what?
Posted by: Jay at October 22, 2005 01:30 AM (PIbeE)
5
Jay, thanks for commenting, I don't see the kind of rection I would have thought created, what is it? Have the Canadian people thrown in the towel and become robotic beer drinking hockyey and football fans and thats all? How long will they keep their sports if this keeps up, and do you agree that if it was Canadians going overseas to kill the French, Herr Martin would be up all nite designing legislation to stop it and arrest those before they get on the planes, believe it, thats if the French were being killed.
This Country is no longer a save place to bring up kids, the immigrants are leaving in droves, and the decent Canadians are leaving in droves, leaving a waistland of corruption and filth, for the Elite to become very rich, using Canada as their own personal bank acct. at the expense of us all.
You have a better chance of dying from a criminal act now than of old age.
I have never been so devistated in my life, and how now can we face the Americans with any kind of pride, or respect, or manlihood? We can't and there will be deaths on this continent over this, the American kooks of the country will take great delight out of getting even by killing Canadian tourists, bet on it.
Well the Librano$ voted in these mental retards now that have turned into beasts, and evil, lets see how many vote for them that will be showing their colours that they too are nothing more than beasts and evil.
God bless all the troops, GEEZE, I wish I was younger, I would join up just to go looking for these so-calle "Canadians", and be happy to blow their brains out. Will they get blown out if they make it back here?, HMMMMMMM interesting?
Stphen Parksville BC ww 2 vet.
Posted by: stephenmichaud at October 22, 2005 03:59 AM (bxOjK)
6
Stephen, I share your frustration and bewilderment. It often seems as though the values that people like you - along with my great-grandfather, grandfather and father - fought for so valiantly have been suddenly deemed irrelevant. Yet the growing number of Canadian blogs indicates that there is growing resistance to the kind of appeasement to totalitarianism that the Liberal Party espouses, and is it not a sign of hope that so many have been moved to speak out?
Further, I firmly believe that, where there are indeed some people who came here with murder in their hearts, many more came here to embrace freedom. They haven't found a voice, but they definitely don't want to return to countries ruled by despots.
This is a small but telling sign: I attended a committee meeting at a near-by Legion Hall (it was over a non-Legion related thing but they are generous to community groups) and some idiot whined because he had to take his hat off. It wasn't the first time he whined about his imaginery issue but it did mark the first time that everyone at the meeting rose en masse and revolted at his sneering ingratitude - we wanted to toss him out even after he removed his hat!
Small thing, to be sure, but telling (and I live in Toronto, for crying out loud!)
And don't you ever be ashamed. We Americans are fully aware that we have appeasers in our midst too (one made an unsuccessful run for the presidency only last year!) and just as we had to carefully nurse our own embers during the Clinton years so we know too that the embers in the hearts of those bold fighting men from the North may appear to be dormant but they have not been extinguished.
As for attacking France, how I'd love to lead that charge! Sadly, reason tells me that it is much more satifying to back them into a corner, as has been done over Lebanon with the U.N.'s Mehlis report. But every dog has his day ...
Posted by: Debbye at October 23, 2005 05:07 AM (USyJ8)
7
Well then instead of being neutral in the matter of the illegal war against Iraq, if what you posted is correct then it appears some Canadians are on the side that is right in this matter, even more morally good than being neutral, like Americans and Canadians who went overseas and joined the International Brigades in the Spanish Civil War to fight against the fascists. I guess these guys are just fighting against today's fascist oppressors, the U.S. Can't really blame them as it is America that's totally in the wrong here.
Posted by: Lawrence at October 27, 2005 11:58 AM (6/LqO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The real scandal in Dingwall's "approved" expenses
Oct. 21 - David Dingwall
explains his expenses and in one respect he is entirely correct: his expenses were approved by the Canadian Mint's Board of Directors.
But that's the point! The fact that those "expenses" were "approved" is a real scandal as much as is the appointment of political hacks who feel it necessary to pad their income by lobbying for contracts for which lobbying is forbidden.
So why is Dingwall getting severance pay instead of jail time? (I know why; just let me emote!)
Patronage appointments lead to corruption. The resistance by the political parties to legislate having such appointments be made strictly on merit and qualifications is why many are indifferent or even hostile to politics, and when the argument devolves to "give the other side an opportunity to appoint their own thieving cronies" then we are well past cynicism and apathy and into a level of contempt that can kill the heart of a country.
Shoot. For. The. Stars. Demand competence, accountability and honesty from all appointed officials. Taxpayers deserve no less.
Posted by: Debbye at
05:00 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 190 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The Mint's board... exactly. During Mansbridge , Chantal and Gunter exchange, Gunter brings up the real question, who are the dipsticks that approve this ivory tower arrogant largess with taxpayer's money?
Dingwall's, Trudeau-like arrogance with, * entitlrments, my entitlements!* No mention of the overblown amounts involved. The dollar amount arrived at by his board member buddies.
These prima-donnas write in gigantic pay-out amounts for each other, and we, the potato farmers, say, * uh... it's written, guess it must be right eh?*
What total hogwash. 73s TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 21, 2005 08:24 AM (rmMzv)
2
I am afraid Dingwall's powerful ability to concentrate and think on his feet under gunfire is going to cost the taxpayers more money.
He reminds me so much of Trudeau and the steel trap mind honed by a jesuite education.
I see this going the way of the Mulrooney trial. Emotional and correct accusations but without ironclad framing, leading to awards paid out to Dingwall, in this case.
I watched the questioning on CPAC and saw Dingwall leathally tear apart his accusers arguments.
Too bad, but there are many worthy opponents in the Librano army. That explains their increasing iron grip on the controls of the good ship Canada.
Just glancing over the first 10 to 20 entries will amaze you when you enter Whistle Blower in the search window at http://www.technorati.com
You will get a return of 3,922 entries, but you only need to look at the first 10 - 20 to get an idea of the scope of Whistle Blower Protection.
I thought I knew a lot about it, but this surprised me. This stuff is like reading a wide ranging expose. Fascination! Technorati is a fun site anyway, where you can lay claim to your blogsite and get lots of feedback.
Later, look at URLTrends.com, also, ‘way above average. 73s
Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 22, 2005 03:13 AM (rmMzv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Operation Rudolph
Oct. 21 -
Operation Rudolph - as in guiding Santa's team to deliver packages to Canadian Forces personnel in Afghanistan (link via
Newsbeat1.)
There's no nice way to say this: public support for Canadian troops up here is all talk and no show. Yes, everyone shows up at the local Cenotaph once a year on Remembrance Day, stands around solemnly and intones "Never Again!" but when it comes to actually giving something (and we won't even go into federal funding for the troops) there isn't the kind of personal, local support here as there is in the U.S.A.
No one's asking you to "give 'till it hurts" (that right is reserved for the taxman) but maybe you can send a thank-you note. Or a donation (tax-deductible, no less!)
I'm as guilty as anyone up here of doing little to support the Canadians in Afghanistan, but then my energy and money go to supporting my people in my army in the U.S.A. What's your excuse?
By the way, before anyone sneers at the Canadian presence in 'stan, they might want to read Canadian forces offer first peek at JTF2 mission in Afghanistan from Sept. 21. (Run the complete headline through google for article.)
Also, read Postcard from Kandahar over at Small Dead Animals.
Posted by: Debbye at
02:04 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 216 words, total size 2 kb.
1
This is the most important post to be seen anywhere. Guess I just have to steal it. TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 21, 2005 08:30 AM (rmMzv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 19, 2005
A Canadian institution
(Sent via email by a friend out West.)
Sorry about the no blogging - I feel asleep early and woke up late.
Tim Horton's, for any readers who may not know, is a huge chain of donut shops up here and most have drive-through service. Many a person arrives to work with a Tim Horton's cup in hand.
Tim Horton was a legendary hockey player who, for most of his career, played for the Toronto Maple Leafs and he may have been the strongest man to ever play in the NHL. Story has it that he didn't fight - he just bearhugged 'em. He last played for the Buffalo Sabres and was killed in a car crash on the QEW in the 1974.
Posted by: Debbye at
08:20 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 129 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Tim Horton, one of many hockey players to die or kill friends or team mates in the crash of an expensive car. Should the HHOF have a special section for this kind of dubious achievement? Just askin'
Posted by: DoubtingThomas at October 19, 2005 08:43 PM (YD54c)
2
Tim Horton, Allan Stanley, Bobby Baun and Carl Brewer on defence. Not bad at all.
Posted by: John B at October 20, 2005 10:25 AM (ju7Wp)
3
Actually I believe he died in a car crash, not on the QEW, but at the end of Scott Street in St. Catharines Ontario, the street I lived on as a kid. It is right beside the QEW.
I also believe that he was at the time the subject of a high speed police pursuit, perhaps alcohol related, but it was a long time ago.
Posted by: Larry Borsato at October 20, 2005 12:57 PM (eMrF8)
4
Alternate news , reviews and exchanges about Canada going down the tubes in a hand basket is great enjoyment. CanÂ’t get enough.
For some lighter narcissistic fun, navel gazing fun, try:
http://www.URLtrends.com
You can get a quality 4 page report on your website there and I guarantee you will find it interesting.
Most interesting, I find, is where you get to see other sites who have taken an interest in you and said nothing about it.
The report is free, however, if you decide to get serious like Angry, Strong, and Kate, you can get a steady one year watch and report for up to 50 blogsites for about $50 Canadian - $44 American.
I think itÂ’s amazing that you can get these free reports from URLTrends.com. I wonder how much longer that will last? 73s TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 20, 2005 08:32 PM (rmMzv)
5
Um, the point of the post was supposed to be that Toronto police officers, on horseback, rode through a Tim Horton's drive-through in rotten weather.
In my own small way (and with severely limited time available) I was trying to support Toronto's police force which is now engaged in a contract dispute but my brilliant segue was ruined by my stupid browser (IE, of course) that wouldn't let me post above it about the police action and I had to run for the stupid bus instead of completing the pass.
I will gladly plead ignorance about Tim Horton! I arrived in Canada after his death and it took awhile before I learned that hockey was not "roller derby on ice."
Larry is probably right about the actual place of death; legend has put it on the QEW (Mark is all about The Legends of Hockey and Baseball) but I've driven in that region both in town and on the QEW in February and you don't need to be either drunk or in a police chase to run into problems. There was that bit of black ice near Stoney Creek ... but I digress.
But ignorant or no, I also had a fascination for baseball manager Billy Martin, who too lived hard and died hard.
Rock'em sock'em sports players are still loved and admired, maybe because they breathe guts and verve in our tidy, well-ordered little lives?
Posted by: Debbye at October 21, 2005 04:44 AM (Mk38m)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 18, 2005
The rogue lobbyists explanation
Oct. 18 - From rogue civil servants to rogue lobbyists - which in turn poses the question as to who, exactly, was roguely lobbied if not rogue civil servants? After all, if certain kinds of contracts and grants are not supposed to be lobbied for wouldn't the person(s) being lobbied know that?
Four lobbyists investigated for possible ethics breaches:
Mr. Nelson said he cannot comment on the investigations, but confirmed that he started them in the past month, although he said that the activities that are being probed are not necessarily that recent. Officials said the investigations cover the activities of four lobbyists.
[...]
"I have initiated eight investigations into potential breaches of the Lobbyists' Code of Conduct," Mr. Nelson said. "That may not seem like a large number . . . but in contrast, since the code of conduct came into being in the late 1990s, there has not been one investigation."
Mr. Nelson's office, which until last year came under the purview of the prime minister's ethics counsellor, Howard Wilson, has been criticized for what has been perceived as inaction in enforcing the law and code governing lobbyists. The Lobbyists' Act was amended in June to include wording changes proposed four years ago after prosecutors asserted that they could not successfully prosecute René Fugère, an unpaid aide to former prime minister Jean Chrétien, for failing to register to lobby on behalf of companies that paid him a 5- to 10-per-cent commission to obtain government grants.
Stay tuned.
Posted by: Debbye at
06:06 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 254 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Let's see - lobbyists investigated for possible breaches of ethics. There appears to be redunduncies in that statement.
Posted by: John B at October 19, 2005 10:16 AM (ju7Wp)
2
Let's see. Would the business card read;
Rene Fugere,
Professional Government Trough Consultant..?
Excellent digging. Your next assignment, should you choose to take it. $450 Millions Provincial and Federal Government boost to Quebec's forestry industry. What's wrong here? How long before this Band-Aid for buggy whips meets the next crisis? Why do governments choose this moment to feed the US argument for 27% lumber tariffs? Why have Quebec tin-pot bosses not discovered R&D and industrial diversity for rural Quebec? Why does Quebec continue to milk Albert....Enough!
REQUIRED: Executive Director type to take over the following and make it fly for the benefit of all bloggers and Canada to boot.
BlogWorldCentral
Josh makes some very blunt and strong points. Points along the lines of get off the pot and do something real. Josh encourages us to do something positive or concrete.
In the blogworld, the most valuable things are usually ideas. An idea that captures a note of agreement among all bloggers who understand that idea and want to participate and be part of the whole concept.
One such idea may be a central parade ground where all or at least the vast majority of us could meet and lend our collective weight to the most current, worthy and immediately pressing national priority.
That central meeting powerhouse could be called something like blogworld Central or Blogcity Central or Blog Power Central.
This site could become known as the place where bloggers decide among several priority or urgent matters of National importance and urge Government to adopt the current, most important policy. The priority policy voted for and backed by thousands in the blogging world.
By bringing a huge body of blogworld members together behind the most urgent current cause, the Government would have no reasonable option but to consider our priority cause with extreme care and gravity. If they hope to be voted back into power, that is.
This is a potential and very real power we members of the blogworld could have but are not making use of because we do not as yet have our central clearing house of power set up. This central parade ground, where most bloggers check in daily to see how the current priority issue is advancing.
There could be a number of issues in a vertical list arranged in order with the most important at the top. This could look something like a thermometer, or vertical graph as is often used on television to show fund raising results.
This graphic would be attractive to bloggers who could drop by and instantly see how their favourite priority policy stands in relation to other important issues requiring government action.
There are a few websites that seem to be modeled somewhat along these lines. The Taxpayers Federation comes to mind. That site however has a single focus of tax related issues only. Very good.
We are looking for a massive central site that will rank many issues in priority order and bring pressure to bear upon government to have the top priority issue properly delt with.
73s TG http://My.Opera.com/T-G/ http://BendGovernment.blogspot.com
PS: Anyone aspiring to the Project Manager or the Executive Director position with the time, energy and motivation to take this on?
It would look great on your resume. It would do some immense good for Canada and it could potentially make you quite wealthy.
Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 19, 2005 01:22 PM (rmMzv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
" ... I am really not a scary guy."
Oct. 18 - I am genuinely sorry that Carolyn Parrish is not running for re-election (
Parrish not retiring-in any sense) and my reason isn't all that complicated. For all her faults, she had one redeeming virtue: she was honest, even if that included being outspoken as to her attitude toward the U.S.A.
My own experience tells me that she expresses the truth as to how many Canadians (at least here in the Greater Toronto Area) feel about us and our president. I prefer her upfront, in-your-face brazenness to the smile-in-their-faces-and-stab-them-in-the-back type of creature PM Paul Martin epitomizes.
I do realize that many Canadians consider her to be an embarrasssment, but what real value is there in pretending that the U.S.A. and Canada are bestest buddies? It does not serve American interests (we already came to terms with the peridy of the French) and, although it may appear to serve Canadian interests, how does being dishonest really serve Canada? It seems to me that being two-faced can only inspire contempt from Americans and, to this American mind, better straightforward honesty to blowing smoke up our as*es.
I don't have to like what someone is saying but at least say it openly. Yet with such honest dealing a deeper chasm would be revealed because many Canadians do not agree with the the Liberal government's attitude toward the U.S.A. That is the debate the Liberals continue to avoid.
However, despite the revision of recent history, Caorlyn Parrish was actually booted out of the Liberal Party for remarks she made about Paul Martin, not those she made about President Bush, and she used this interview to remind us of that. That Martin - with the complicity of the news media - tried to turn it around later and pretend that she was expelled for for her anti-Bush antics pretty much says everything there is to say about this government and its media apologists.
I wonder, did Martin hire Earnscliffe to conduct a public opinion poll to ascertain if Canadians would stomach him dropping Parrish for stomping a Bush doll on public TV or if charging her with lese majesty would be preferable?
Her comments in the interview about Paul "Dithers" Martin reflect what many have observed:
"One of my major disappointments in my whole life, and it will turn out to be one of the major disappointments of most Canadians, is Mr. Martin's leadership. He has been so fragile and he's been so tentative," Ms. Parrish said in her first interview since it was announced that she would not be running in the next federal election.
Paul Martin is "too keen to sit on the knee of the American President. He's been weak on softwood even though he's running around making noises now. He's been weak on beef. He's been weak on caucus management. He's got a whole bunch of yes men sitting in the front row. He is thoroughly intimidated by someone like me -- and I am really not a scary guy."
[...]
"I expected so much out of him. He's a very charming man but he's almost like a deer in the headlights. He looks old and he looks tired and he looks frightened."
Her loyalty to the Liberal Party seems genuine, despite her disappointment in the leadership of Paul Martin. She explains that she decided not to run because she feared a split vote would give the riding to a Conservative candidate, and it is well known that her vote in the "officially sanctioned" non-confidence motion kept the Liberals in power although a lesser person might have used the circumstance for some payback.
So long, Carolyn. Too bad the Liberal Party doesn't have a big enough tent to allow for a little honesty.
Posted by: Debbye at
07:40 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 638 words, total size 4 kb.
1
I very much disagree with your assessment of Carloyn Parrish. I may have some respect (however strained) towards some NDP members and their attitudes to the U.S. and Pres. Bush but IÂ’m sorry, Ms. Parrish is a nasty boorish piece of work.
Following are some excerpts from a column written by National Post writer Gillian Cosgrove regarding Parrish – you tell me if this isn’t the work of a completely self-centred, not particularly bright, boor.
“It turns out that Americans aren't the only objects of her hatred. Also on her personal blacklist are East Coast fishermen, French-speaking Quebecers, residents of downtown Toronto, members of her own Liberal Party, and even her boss, Jean Chretien.”
“More often than not, Parrish's pronouncements are couched in the language of the gutter, contrary to the time-honoured parliamentary tradition which dictates that even the most intransigent political enemies treat each other with courtesy and respect.
She accused John McCallum, the Defence Minister, of "farting around in Washington." She denounced Liberal MPs who criticize Chretien anonymously as "sneaking, sniveling shitheads." She told the Mississauga News that she was "tired of kissing ass up here (in Ottawa.)"
“Parrish's cheap shots often have a bullying tone, and stop just short of character assassination. Clashing with Beryl Ford, chair of the Peel Board of Education over the English as a second language program, Parrish threatened to "beat her up."
She called seven members of the Liberal caucus "toads, dull blunt clods" and "desperate idiots" for being Martin supporters. The targets -- colleagues John Harvard, Diane Marleau, Stan Keyes, Nick Discepola, Joe Fontana, Rick Limoges, and Paul Bonwick -- showed class and maturity by refusing to descend to her gutter-sniping tactics.
She also threatened, as vice-chair of a committee that administer the House. To discipline a journalist if he dared to publish what she had said - a threat to press freedom that media organizations should challenge and condemn.
Parrish's record of shameless behavior goes further back. In March 1999, she accused fellow Mississauga MP Albina Guarnieri of being "evil" for introducing a private members' bill on consecutive sentencing for multiple murderers. "I think she's evil, but I have never called her evil," Parrish said at the time. "I think she believes passionately that she is doing the right thing, and that is the only reason you don't just grab her and throttle her."
“Instances of Parrish's vulgarian behaviour have become the stuff of legend. Ted Woloshyn, the popular talk show host on CFRB, some months ago overheard a disgruntled Parrish in a restaurant engaging in a loud-mouthed, obscenity-laden rant against the prime minister for failing to put her in the cabinet. He deemed it newsworthy enough to broadcast the fact to his listeners. (Thankfully, in the case, the PM showed good judgement by keeping her out of cabinet.)
Parrish is also a loose cannon with her outrageous slurs. In Halifax, she attacked East Coast fishermen who "fish three months of the year, make $60,000 and then sit on UI." This is simplistic and offensive, if not downright ignorant.
“In 1995, just before the razor-edge referendum which threatened to break up Canada, Parrish went on Rogers Cable TV to declare in a know-it-all tone: "I hate to tell everybody and I particularly hope that Quebecers don't watch this show. It (the referendum) is being greeted with an enormous yawn in Mississauga. Quite frankly, I think it almost like a form of torture. It's constant dripping, whining, and fussing from Quebec. Everybody's going: "Oh!”
“Finally, in an incident that raised eyebrows everywhere, Parrish was dismissively cruel to a Polish immigrant family who came to her for help to stay in Canada.
She subjected Pawel and Beata Sklarzyk to yelling and profanity in front of their children aged, 2, 4, 11, and 15 saying "I don't give a shit if you found a high powered lawyer to get your story in the Globe and Mail."
The Sklarzyks came to Canada with their two older children in 1994. They renewed their visitor's visas three times and then stayed on illegally. Mr. Sklarzyk started a small window washing and caulking business and the couple had two more children. When a refugee claim was denied, the family applied for an exemption on humanitarian grounds. But instead of sending the required $1,200 payment, they mistakenly sent only $1,150 -- a $50 error that upended their lives and left them in legal limbo. The family was deported in May 2001.”
http://www.friendsofamerica.ca/Press/nationalpost290303.html
Read it all. Fuck Carolyn Parrish, she’s an embarrassment to all MPs. I hear she would like to take a run at being mayor of Mississauga but I bet she hasn’t the guts to take on Hazel McCallion. Now there is a lady I respect – if only Parrish had one iota of the class that Hurricane Hazel has.
If Britney Spears decides to run for political office in 30 years – well there’s Carolyn Parrish – except Spears could at least dance - well sort of ;-)
Cheers,
John
NB – you’ve almost ruined my day – must have another cappucino.
Posted by: John B at October 18, 2005 10:33 AM (ju7Wp)
2
In an attempt to stay away from being boorish or self-centered, my experience has been that there will always be areas where Canadians and Americans are very much Best-Buddies in fact.
One such arena is within the military. We, in our specialized branch of the RCN, often worked with US military persons, shoulder to shoulder, and I remember it as being the best of all possible times during military service.
While politicians are in a position to draw attention to differences. We have to keep in mind that those differences are often between politians or lobby / industrial groups and not between Americans and Canadians in general at all.
Chretien annoyed and disappointed Bush. Chretien never spoke for all Canadians and most Americans know that. The people of the US and Canada have a mutual liking and respect, in spite of our fumbling governments.
Remember stranded Americans in 9/11 Newfoundland?
On the matter of softwood duties. The Americans are not off the wall.
They do have just cause. Our governments, Federal and Provincial, have been deceptive.
Technical rulings are one thing, but before we become too smug in our false purity, just remember the MSM has been guilty of fraud before. In this too, they are guilty. TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 18, 2005 03:25 PM (rmMzv)
3
Parrish is also a loose cannon with her outrageous slurs. In Halifax, she attacked East Coast fishermen who "fish three months of the year, make $60,000 and then sit on UI." This is simplistic and offensive, if not downright ignorant.
Ummmm, but its true.
Oh, and by the way you were doing real well in your post UNTIL you said this
"Read it all. Fuck Carolyn Parrish"
That type of language is TOTALLY innapropriate and I am offened. So just fuck right off---OK!!
Horny Toad
Posted by: Horny Toad at October 19, 2005 12:46 AM (1MfAa)
4
I'm sorry if I scorched someone's ear. Screw Carloyn Parrish.
Satisfied.
Re: east cost fisherman. If the idiot (too kind a word but I don't want to offend you) had stated that perhaps some east coast fisherman do this - fine. It kind of fits in with "damn Americans, I hate those bastards" type of all encompassing statement uttered by the not too bright who happen to think they are that bright.
I would like to see her run against McCallion - think she has the spine for it? To hell with Parrish (that OK?).
Re: language - maybe you should call Ms. Parrish and chastise her over this -
"She subjected Pawel and Beata Sklarzyk to yelling and profanity in front of their children aged, 2, 4, 11, and 15 saying "I don't give a shit if you found a high powered lawyer to get your story in the Globe and Mail."
Her contact info where you can indulge in butt kissing is:
OTTAWA OFFICE
Room 802
Justice Building
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0A6
Phone: (613) 995-7321
Fax: (613) 992-6708
Better hurry before she moves out.
Posted by: John B at October 19, 2005 10:29 AM (ju7Wp)
5
Oh no, John, not the dreaded capuccino fix! But you are right about her and those who defend her views. She also blasted the head of the Canadian Forces (I haven't had my second cup yet but I believe it's General Hillier?) for his honesty about the Afghan mission.
I guess I'm sorry to see her go for personal reasons which are not very worthy: she gave voice to what a lot of people secretly believe and yet, despite her boorishness, she could very well have been re-elected as an Independent.
I don't like most (if not all) of what she said or represented but in more honest times those remarks might have been cause for some introspection and even debate about state of the national culture (the real one, not the sham.)
The fisherman comments reflect a a general attitude toward down-easterners. "Newfie" jokes are incredibly offensive but telling them is acceptable. So much for the "diverse" and "inclusive" society fiction - and getting rid of Parrish is yet another instance of sweeping the contempt many Canadians have for one another aside to maintain the "we're so nice" hypocrisy.
Remember the heat Harper took when he spoke against the "culture of defeat" mentality?
You don't solve problems by ignoring them!
Thus endeth the rant. And I'm off to Tim Horton's!
Posted by: Debbye at October 19, 2005 08:38 PM (Zr5g1)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 16, 2005
Closing a tax haven
Oct. 16 - I'm super late posting on this, but an important private members bill has been submitted to Parliament calling for the closing of a tax haven for Canadian businesses.
A detailed report can be read at Frost Hits the Rhubarb: Proposed Amendment: Income Tax -- Note, CSL.
It is despicable that tax dollars are spent on contracts with firms that dodge paying business taxes in Canada - or in the U.S.A., for that matter. Let's hope this bill gets some support.
Posted by: Debbye at
05:58 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 91 words, total size 1 kb.
October 14, 2005
That "rogue civil servant" explanation
Oct. 14 - Testimony previously under publication ban has been released by Judge Gomery which gives a closer look at the financial relationship between Jean Brault and Chuck Guite (
Money bound Brault and Guite) all of which seems to be in line with the "rogue civil servant" explanation:
Both men said that after he left the federal civil service in 1999, Guite collected thousands of dollars for advising Brault on how to boost his business, often at the expense of taxpayers.
Guite and Brault are now charged with conspiracy and defrauding the government of nearly $2 million. Their trial is set for May 2006. The testimony made public Friday does not touch on any of the contracts that resulted in criminal charges.
[...]
The testimony illustrates the cosy, back-scratching environment that exploded into the $250-million sponsorship fiasco, which featured ad agencies and other middle-men collecting $100 million, often for little or no work.
[...]
According to Brault's testimony, his involvement began at the Vancouver Molson Indy auto race in 1995 where Guite taught him how federal sponsorships were really run.
"That's where he showed me that there was a sponsorship the government gave to (advertising company) Lafleur, and by spending three days in jeans with a beer in hand it's much easier to establish contacts," Brault said in the testimony.
"It was the first time that I would say I sowed, as we say in the business, a little seed to get one of these non-conventional contracts."
Both Guite and Brault reaped the harvest. While Brault gathered millions in ad contracts through his firm Groupaction, Guite picked smaller fruit at first.
Both men say Brault gave Guite high-performance Pirelli tires in 1997 for his brand new Ford Mustang. Brault's company billed the sponsorship program more than $1,300 for the tires. A few months later, Brault bought the car from Guite for $35,000 after Guite decided he was too old for a sports car.
[...]
Guite testified that Groupaction purchased expensive tickets for him and his family for the Italian Grand Prix in 1998.
Guite said that once he left the public service in 1999 he worked on contracts for Groupaction, receiving $76,000 from the company through August 2000.
Brault said he had put Guite on a $10,000 monthly retainer by 2001 for his "vast knowledge of ... the potential of different organizations working on communications in Canada."
According to Brault, his company gave more than $136,000 to Oro Communications, Guite's firm, from 1999 through 2002.
Guite said he borrowed $25,000 from a Groupaction subsidiary, Alexism Inc., to purchase a boat in 2001.
Guite was to repay the money from a $125,000 commission he was to receive later that year from Brault on a handshake deal. The repayment plan was interrupted when the sponsorship scandal broke and became a criminal case.
Guite said he still intends to repay the money, with interest.
Other testimony released Friday highlighted other aspects of the sponsorship file:
--Paul Coffin, the first man convicted of fraud in the sponsorship program, testified that Guite told him to fabricate invoices to cash in on sponsorships. Coffin pleaded guilty to several counts of fraud earlier this year and received a sentence to be served in the community. The sentence is under appeal.
-- Brault testified that Guite pressed him into making a $50,000 donation to Jean Charest's provincial Liberals through ad agency Groupe Everest in 1998. Brault said Guite named Charest, saying "We must send $50,000 to Charest." Brault later qualified the statement by saying Guite was talking about the Charest campaign, not Charest personally.
Guite denies the accusations.
So much for Guite, Brault and Coffin, but the question lingers: what the hell were those
elected to run the country and oversee expenditures doing? Either they were doing their job and Guite, Brault, Coffin and others were doing what they were expected to do, or those elected
weren't doing their jobs so what the hell good are they and why would Canadians entrust their future to such fall downs?
(Link via Neale News.)
Posted by: Debbye at
08:02 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 679 words, total size 4 kb.
October 13, 2005
Loyalty from Diversity
Oct. 13 - Interesting poll results (
Canadians value diversity, demand loyalty: poll):
The majority of Canadians believe the country's multicultural society helps guard against extremism, a new survey shows. However, most respondents also believe Canadians should be loyal first and foremost to Canada, not their countries of origin.
The results may indicate where a country that prides itself on multiculturalism is prepared to draw the line on tolerance.
Nice of the
Globe to confuse loyalty with tolerance!
To me this poll simply indicates that most Canadians have common sense.
As an aside, I've been doing a marathon thing at work (we call it "gearing up for Christmas") but things are expected to return to normal next week (that's the official story, anyway.)
(Link via Neale News.)
Posted by: Debbye at
08:56 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 130 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Various Cultures are great and I love 'em all. Originally from Montreal I have eaten supper with Romanians, Ukrainians, jews, Chinese, Indians, Natives and many others. The customs, music and foods are great.
One thing I find difficulty with is the acts of war that sometimes occur here when the war is in Pakistan or India.
There have been actions between Sikhs and Punjabi in Vancouver. Not to mention an airliner going down with 300 plus mostly innocent people.
Actions of force should only be carried out in the countries at war. Actions in Canada should be limited public peaceful demonstrations only.
Music culture..A real Value to me!
Hope you like these guys too!
===================================
People who find CDBaby, stick to CDBaby!
CDBabay.com - Good for Artists & Me
Friday, 14. October 2005, 10:36:01
albums, artist, artists, blues ...
About CD Baby... http://www.CDBaby.com
Who/What are we?
CD Baby is a little online record store that sells
CDs by independent musicians.
[In•de•pen•dent: (adj.) Not having sold one's life, career, and creative works over to a corporation.]
We're just a few people in a cool Portland, Oregon, CD warehouse that looks like a playground. We listen to every CD we sell before we sell it, so we can help you find other albums you'll like.
We only sell CDs that come
directly from musicians. No distributors.
Musicians send us CDs. We warehouse them, sell them to you, and pay the musicians directly.
Cool thing: in a regular record deal or distribution deal, musicians only make $1-$2 per CD, if they ever get paid by their label. When selling through CD Baby, musicians make $6-$12 per CD, and get paid weekly.
Derek Sivers and his Oregon music gurus are a breath of real fresh air... TG at http://My.Opera.com/T-G/
Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 14, 2005 04:21 PM (rmMzv)
2
Tony, I too was thinking of the Air India bombing when I read the article and, as you point out, Canadians were murdered in a dispute that didn't involve Canada.
In that instance, the question of loyalty gets turned on its head. The Canadian government agencies investigating the bombing spent more time pursuing their turf war than seeking justice for the victims - how much loyalty did investigators display for the victims and their families?
Posted by: Debbye at October 14, 2005 06:41 PM (b35/0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 07, 2005
Happy Thanksgiving and Be Careful!
Oct. 7 - I can't be the only person in Toronto who has taken the alert for New York subways as a warning to up my own Awareness Meter when riding the subway here (
Official: Threat cites this weekend) so, in the immortal words of Sgt. Phil Esterhaus,
Let's be careful out there.
I have to work again tonight but before I head out I want to wish all of you in Canada and the members of the Canadian Forces around the world - including Afghanistan - a blessed Thanksgiving weekend.
We do have a lot to be grateful for. I know I gripe a lot but I also live in a country where I can do so publicly.
Mark, on the other hand is not grateful. The BoSox were eliminated and he's temporarily inconsolable.
(Please let the Angels win. I don't think Mark can handle it if they blow a 5-0 lead over the Yankees.)
Posted by: Debbye at
08:48 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 165 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Keep your eyes open on public transport but also have that closet you never open full of bottled water, batteries (if you need 'em), MRE's (if you can get 'em) and similar stuff.
And oh yeah, toilet paper - you girls go through that stuff like two or three rolls a day.
Oh and speaking of - keep a certain number of those empty coffee cans with the plastic lids.
Posted by: Jay at October 08, 2005 04:16 PM (PIbeE)
2
I'm bummed too about the BoSox and am now into the anybody but the Yanks mode.
A happy Thanksgiving to you and your family Debbye, and yes we have much to be thankful for.
Posted by: David A. Giles at October 08, 2005 06:40 PM (TpFeN)
3
I little time off to look at how to get wealthy on the net.
http://www.harmeetsinghkohli.com/InterBusACan.htm
Riches interest you? International Entrepreneur!
Something of a right leaning free enterpriser ? You can waste years going to university or you can accept and study some pages free from Royal Bank Websites. Better scan these pages free, first.
The Royal Bank wants you to get busy and make lots of money and then remember who helped you and let the RBC handle that money for you. In other words, * come bank at the Royal, but it would be nice if you managed to finesse lots of money first.
The Royal Bank website is huge and you may not know where to turn, so … Here’s where you get the free University grade material.
http://www.RoyalBankofCanada.ca/html Gets you to pay dirt. Don’t forge /html
www.banks-area.com/bank-banking-ca-online-royal
http://www.harmeetsinghkohli.com/InterBusACan.htm
Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 09, 2005 04:08 AM (rmMzv)
4
Jay, above, has the right idea regarding emergency supplies. It's so easy to have several 4L milk containers full of water on hand, every one should do it.
I store them in the back of the kitchen cupboards on the floor behind the pots and pans.
For great health you can have lots of dried apricots and dates stored in coffee cans or plastic jars [ex-peanut butter]and lots of Fig-bars. They stay fresh for a long time and will keep you healthy , but along with cans of Cashews [$3.97 each], at Zellers, you must be prepared for a sort of Viagra effect. Don't say I didn't warn you.
Healthy, means
HEALTHY 73s TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 12, 2005 06:49 AM (rmMzv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 06, 2005
Anti-Semitism and the Saudis
Oct. 6 - Pieter reports on a disturbing incident at Vancouver Island's Pearson College at which
swastikas were painted on the sidewalk greeted Israeli Consul General Cobie Brosh when he visited that campus.
[Oct. 7 - 07:04: Pieter has some information on the response of the college administration to the incident here and I guess it would be safe to say that they dealt with it much as one would expect a U.N. sponsored school to do but perhaps more than one would expect the U.N. to do.]
Is anti-Semitism in North America on the rise? There is certainly reason to be concerned, and certainly reason to confront that possibility. There is also reason to wonder what role the Saudis might have played if there has been an uprise.
According to this article in the NY Sun, the U.S. State Department has demanded that Saudi Arabia answer for their distribution of hate literature to mosques and schools in the U.S.A. I say "their" because the literature bears the official seal of the government of Saudi Arabia. The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee will hold hearings on the hate literature starting Oct. 25.
The literature appears beyond inflammatory and even incites treasonable actions by recent Muslim immigrants to the U.S. The Sun article deserves to be read in full because, if the allegations are correct, we have a big problem: our views on human rights and liberties are in direct conflict with our need to defend ourselves.
The flurry of activity comes months after a report from the Center for Religious Freedom discovered that dozens of mosques in major cities across the country, including New York, Washington, and Los Angeles, were distributing documents, bearing the seal of the government of Saudi Arabia, that incite Muslims to acts of violence and promote hatred of Jews and Christians.
A Washington-based group that is part of the human rights organization Freedom House, the Center for Religious Freedom also found during its yearlong study that the Saudi-produced materials describe democracy and America as un-Islamic. They instruct recent Muslim immigrants to consider Americans as enemies and the materials urge new arrivals to use their time here as preparation for jihad. The documents also promote the version of Islam officially embraced by Saudi government and several of the September 11, 2001, hijackers, Wahhabism, as the only authentic Islam.
[...]
The Accountability Act, introduced in June, says its purpose is "to halt Saudi support for institutions that fund, train, incite, encourage, or in any other way aid and abet terrorism, and to secure fully Saudi cooperation in the investigation of terrorist incidents." The legislation is highly critical of the House of Saud for its support of terrorist activity and cites the January Freedom House report as evidence of the kingdom's complicity in the spread of radical Islamist ideology. As part of the Accountability Act, Senator Specter has in the past held Judiciary Committee hearings into Saudi financing of terrorism and Saudi Arabia's role in injecting ideology into textbooks for Palestinian Arab schoolchildren. (Bolding added)
There has been much criticism of the Bush Administration for its kid-glove treatment of Saudi Arabia and failure to strongly condemn the role in exporting terror particularly through their schools and mosques. The extent to which the Saudis fund terror organizations is also something that has also not been adequately addressed by the Bush administration and accusations that the administration is covering up for the royal family have some validity.
But one peculiarity of U.S. government structure is the separation of the executive and legislative branches, and sometimes Congress takes the lead (as they did in investigations into the U.N. Oil-for-Food program) and it is possible that the White House has chosen to play a diminished but supporting role to this latest Senate investigation:
Also demanding answers about the hate materials is the State Department's undersecretary for public diplomacy and public affairs, Karen Hughes. During a high-profile trip to the Middle East last week, Ms. Hughes said American representatives had addressed the propagation of Saudi hate material in America during private meetings with government officials.
In response to questions as to why the issue was raised privately rather than publicly, Hughes said that "We had been raising the issue privately," Ms. Hughes said, "and as part of raising difficult issues that we need to discuss, I felt it was appropriate."
I have a sinking feeling that there is truth to the allegations. And I don't know quite how we can deal decisively with the Saudis without performing bin Laden's dirty work for him by destablizing the Saudi ruling family, how we can separate those who immigrate in hopes of better lives and those who come to these shores with murder in their hearts.
I'm willing to let the Senate committee take the lead, but I think the Bush administration is going to have to confront the Saudis sooner rather than later.
(I've only had time to quickly read through President Bush's speech to the National Endowment for Democracy but from what I gleaned he didn't admonish the Saudis. It seems to have been a good speech but I need to read it more attentively after work tomorrow morning.)
(NY Sun link via Newsbeat1)
Posted by: Debbye at
07:40 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 816 words, total size 6 kb.
October 05, 2005
3 Canadian soldiers injured
Oct. 5 -
Three Canadian soldiers received minor injuries today by what initial reports indicate was a homicide bomber about one kilometer outside of Kandahar. Approxomatly 250 Canadian soldiers are stationed in that city at present and the deployment will be increased by 1,250 in February.
Kandahar is considered to be more dangerous than Kabul and thus the risk to the Canadian contingent is higher, but Kabul isn't all that safe either. Two Canadian soldiers sustained injuries Sept. 15 from a roadside bomb there.
(Link via Neale News.)
Posted by: Debbye at
07:17 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 96 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I guess it's sort of good news if the best the media can come up with is three minor injuries.
Posted by: Jay at October 05, 2005 04:54 PM (PIbeE)
2
Jay, I fully realize that minor injuries hardly compares from the fatalities of American soldiers in Afghanistan! (and Iraq)
The Canadian government is trying to appease both sides: the "anti-any war" faction and the "we should be supporting our allies" faction knowing full well that the CBC and most of the Canadian media will scream and holler if (or should that be when?) there are casualties.
There was a recent bit of orchestrated outrage at revelations that Canadian soldiers were turning those they captured over to the USA; the inevitable jokes about new orders saying they should "take no prisoners" quickly followed.
Of course there are also a depressing number of anti-Vietnam war movies shown up here on television as well as a seemingly continuous Michael Moore festival.
A bit of public leadership from the government is just too much to expect, I guess. Martin may feel safe in "dither mode" but his short-term strategy is rendering Canada's self-perceived role as "honest broker" on the world stage a joke.
Posted by: Debbye at October 05, 2005 08:30 PM (4dkFg)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 04, 2005
Pink Floyd rules for the Opposition
Oct. 4 - It's a little hard at times to explain the Commons (that's Parliament, for Americans) and how it can sometimes be less than dignified. Even with some of the rowdiness, though, even on my best day I couldn't have predicted that the Conservatives would sing Pink Floyd songs to make a point (
Opposition sings a song of Dingwall):
The Conservatives broke into a rendition of Pink Floyd's Another Brick in the Wall to reveal their disgust at the excessive spending habits of David Dingwall, the former head of the Mint who retired last week amid allegations that he and his staff spent $740,000 last year.
Tory revenue critic Brian Pallister began the rendition with his version of the tune:
"You don't need no information,
We're in charge of thought control,
Fine wines with caviar in the backroom.”
The other Tories finished with the chorus,
"Hey Tories! Leave those Grits alone.” (Spacing added.)
How about working up some new words to AC/DC's
Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap for today's songfest? Oh wait, it's hardly cheap, is it? But so long as it's on the taxpayers dime and they don't mind in sufficient numbers to end Liberal rule ...
There's more here on MP Brian Palliser, who is doing more work on uncovering excessive spending than our (un)investigative press up here.
I really need to sleep. So long until tomorrow.
(Via Neale News.)
Posted by: Debbye at
03:13 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 243 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I wanna see some Alice Cooper lyrics.
"Dead countries . . . can take care of themselves"
I suddenly don't see a whole lot of hope for the conservatives up there.
Posted by: Jay at October 05, 2005 01:20 AM (PIbeE)
2
There is a bounty of uncovered Librano scams.
No need to find more just now. More important to deal with the penalties now.
No doubt a 9pm curfew is serious stuff for stealing one and a hal million.
I'm going to steal $350.000 and maybe lose gum chewing priviledges for two weeks.
But wait, I'm an independent. There are no ol' boys networks protecting me. With my luck, I'll likely get 12 years.
Is that Coat of Arms legal to use on a blogsite at: http://My.Opera.com/T-G/
73s TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 05, 2005 12:26 PM (rmMzv)
3
So have a button made (and maybe a bumper sticker) that says "You Can't Arrest Me, I'm A Liberal!".
Posted by: Jay at October 05, 2005 04:56 PM (PIbeE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Don't hold back!
Oct. 4 - Keith really lets loose in fine style in
More Islamist murders, Jihadi fashionistas, our cowardly ambassador.
He concludes the fiery post by tearing a strip off Canada's Ambassador to the U.S. over remarks made up here at the Empire Club:
Funny isn't it? Our great leaders take pride in needling the country that spends its own blood and treasure to protect Canada, that buys some 80% of our exports.
But they don't have the guts to do the same with, oh, I dunno, China? You know, China? The country whose government does not hesitate to mow down its own citizens with tanks, to arrest, detain and "disappear" people who speak publicly against it? Dysfunctional? Nooooooo. Hell, the Liberals only wish they could get away with it too.
Or Iran, the country that detains, tortures and kills Canadian citizens.
Sharp, pointed commentary.
Posted by: Debbye at
10:54 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 148 words, total size 1 kb.
Paulus Martinius AdScamus
Oct. 4 - Lorrie Goldstein writes a history of Canada from 2,000 years in the future and the pivotal events under the political leadership of one
Paulus Martinius AdScamus.
Funny and sad.
Posted by: Debbye at
07:36 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.
October 01, 2005
Living in Bizarro World
Oct. 1 - I'm just
postive there's a logical explanation as to why the feds would consider giving former Canadian Mint president David Dingwall a severance package (
Dingwall payout dinged.)
But I can't think of one.
Posted by: Debbye at
07:51 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 44 words, total size 1 kb.
108kb generated in CPU 0.0221, elapsed 0.0754 seconds.
73 queries taking 0.0605 seconds, 212 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.