March 24, 2005
Someone (sorry, I don't remember who) speculated that the Schiavo case was another Gary Condit non-scandal which consumed the media waves despite the lack of substance. I don't agree. As a nation we've been through so much sacrifice, heroism, death, loss and recovery these past 4 years and in some respects we are now looking at if (or how much) these momentuous events have changed us.
Follow the "continued" link below if you want to read more, or skip it if you're tired of the subject. It's exhausting, and should be. We've been through two wars, are holding our collective breaths over Lebanon and Krygyzstan (and now Estonia) and once again need to define who and what we are.
I need to sleep or I'll be a total wreck tonight, so I'm signing off (unless I can't sleep. Sigh.)
By the way, there is a somewhat atypical Ann Coulter column, Starved for justice, up at Townhall.com, and she makes a suggestion that is very appealing:
Democrats have called out armed federal agents in order to: 1) prevent black children from attending a public school in Little Rock, Ark. (National Guard), 2) investigate an alleged violation of federal gun laws in Waco, Texas (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms), and 3) deport a small boy to Cuba (Immigration and Naturalization Service).If you're scratching your head and wondering what the second case was, run the name Orval Faubus through your mind and see if something clicks. This has been a difficult case for many of us because there are some very sound reasons why a person might not want extraordinary medical intervention to prolong their life. I had followed the Karen Ann Quinlan case in the 70's and initially believed that Terri Schiavo was in a similar condition and believed she did have the right to die.So how about a Republican governor sending in the National Guard to stop an innocent American woman from being starved to death in Florida?
[...]
In two of the three cases mentioned above, the Democrats' use of force was in direct contravention of court rulings.
But the initial "facts" about Terri Schiavo's medical condition turned out to be erroneous, and it was hard to ignore Michael Schiavo's potential conflict of interest. (I'm only saying potential - none of us really knows what is in his heart and he is probably neither an angel nor a demon.)
Something very precious is at stake - a human life - and something very important is being defined - the quality of that life. I don't think there is a single answer to the latter, and each of us will evaluate and make different decisions about what constitutes such and those decisions will be reflected in the living wills that people need to make.
We need to remember that science is only as good as yesterday's research, and one of the glories of life is that the unknown continues to be far more vast than the known.
When my first son was born, his father and I talked to him while they were cleaning him and he would look in turn specifically at whomever was speaking to him.
This was over 23 years ago, and it was an established "fact" that newborns could not see, but the experts now admit they were wrong, and that newborns have 20-20 vision (barring any congenital diseases or disabilities.)
When he first smiled, the experts said it was gas. I (as well as all mothers!) knew better, and my smile broadened. Experts have since reversed their opinions and now agree with centuries of mothers who knew that baby's funny grimace was baby's first attempt to smile.
When my sister initially came out of her coma, it was believed that all her disabilities were permanent and she would never walk again, but she did. Subsequent research began to indicate that when one part of the brain is damaged, other portions of the brain often take over the tasks originally performed by the now-damaged part.
One of the biggest misconceptions in recent history was the capabilities of children born with Down's Syndrome, and past practices of locking them into institutions seem barbaric (because they were) but what of their quality of life? Even the term "severely disabled" is a fluid one, as new therapies and educative techniques have proven effective.
There is a very good reason why we do not elevate science above human values: new discoveries are made daily which refute long established theories, but lessons about compassion and mercy are also learned daily which can shake our world more profoundly than the discovery of a tenth planet or the reduction of Pluto to an asteroid.
The weeks leading up to Easter have been strange and wondrous: Brian Nichols felt "he was already dead" yet found the strength to show Ashley Smith mercy; many feel Terri Schiavo is already dead, but I fear that the courts will not show her mercy.
Brian Nichols and Terry Schiavo have shaken my world, and have caused me to re-evaluate some of my beliefs and confirmed others, most importantly my dislike of the death penalty (which is now firm opposition.)
I don't know if others are finding this case as throught-provoking or disturbing as me.
Posted by: Debbye at
01:07 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 915 words, total size 6 kb.
Posted by: Bill at March 24, 2005 11:10 PM (WTtgm)
Posted by: Dave J at March 25, 2005 01:46 AM (kLLbt)
Posted by: Bill at March 25, 2005 11:17 PM (LG1KT)
Posted by: Tuning Spork at March 26, 2005 12:20 AM (W/beH)
Posted by: Dave J at March 27, 2005 02:28 AM (kLLbt)
Posted by: Debbye at March 29, 2005 07:34 AM (x97I3)
Posted by: ArchAngel at March 29, 2005 03:27 PM (y36pZ)
Posted by: Debbye at March 30, 2005 03:42 AM (8wdaR)
Posted by: Debbye at March 30, 2005 06:15 AM (A/2+r)
Posted by: ArchAngel at March 30, 2005 01:43 PM (Vo8Av)
64 queries taking 0.0857 seconds, 152 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.