February 22, 2005

PM Martin at NATO Summit

Feb. 22 - From this morning, Martin quiet at NATO summit:

BRUSSELS (CP) - Prime Minister Paul Martin tiptoed around the edge of the limelight Monday prior to the NATO summit as U.S. President George W. Bush's attempted reconciliation with Europe took centre stage. [Aside: What. Ever.]

[...]

Prior to the gathering in Brussels, senior federal officials played up Canada's role as a potential intermediary between the world's only remaining superpower and a continent that is routinely alarmed with the unilateral bent of the Bush administration.

But there has been no evidence of any fence-mending diplomacy by Canada, as none of the prime minister's bilateral meetings during the summit include any outspoken opponents of U.S. foreign policy.

Nevertheless, Foreign Affairs Minister Pierre Pettigrew insisted that Canada's role, although unseen, was still important.

"It is a very natural role for Canada to play a bridge between the United States and the European Union," he said.

"We have a lot of friends in Europe. We are highly regarded on the positions we've taken. At the same time, we are the United States' immediate neighbour, their best friend."

Indeed. See the post below on Frank McKenna, Canada's next Ambassador to the U.S., and his views on this bestest of friends relationship. Maybe it's just me, but I'd nominate Australia and Great Britian for best friend status over Canada.

From this evening: the Prime Minister broke his silence to address the delegates on Iran:

Prime Minister Paul Martin warned NATO leaders Tuesday that they should be prepared to stand up to Iran in order to check the Islamic republic's potential nuclear ambitions.

He told the 25 other alliance leaders at the end of their one-day summit in Brussels that the Islamic republic poses a "serious proliferation threat."

While "diplomacy and dialogue" remain a top priority, the prime minister said the world community "must be prepared to stand behind our words with stronger measures, if necessary."

Tougher measures could include UN-mandated sanctions, but U.S. President George W. Bush has repeatedly suggested he's prepared to use military action if diplomacy fails. (Bolding added.)

Right. Sanctions. Golly gee whiz, what Iranian product might possibly be subject to U.N. sanctions?

Given the results of a recent poll, Yanks "Slick" (sic) and Tired of U.N., I don't think U.N. imposed sanctions are going to be well received by either the American public or Congress. (NY Post link via Neale News.)

The PM was at least more candid than his "senior federal officials:"

Prior to the summit, federal officials played up Canada's potential role in bridging the gap between Europe and the United States, but Martin admitted he was largely on the sidelines.

"The truth of the matter is, to the extent there was a rift, I think it was healed by President Bush and the Europeans," he said. "Canada has a pretty good understanding of both sides and we'll continue to play the role."

Continue to play the role of being on the sidelines? Or play the role of having a good understanding of both sides? (To be fair, I think that could be a bit of sloppy journalism, although it's also possible that the writer was just as bewildered by that last statement as I.)

Posted by: Debbye at 07:50 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 537 words, total size 4 kb.

1 Did you know that Canadian politicans are enabling Canada to sound like a snow covered laugh track?

Posted by: Richard Cook at February 23, 2005 11:12 AM (Km34P)

2 Richard, now you know the real reason Canada produces so many comedians (many of whom move to the US. as quickly as they can.)

Posted by: Debbye at February 23, 2005 08:02 PM (ZGNQX)

3 This is a hard call regarding Iran. A year ago or more I would have awaited the predictable 'take out' by the Israeli Air Force, with America's silent assent, but the murmurs of democracy that are gaining momentum in Iran as a result of their population watching the Iraqi's celebrations and courage at the polling stations, well, that provides perhaps false hope that a strike is not the only possible solution. Sanctions will not work because France, Russia and the UN elites will play the same game as they did in Iraq, trading profits for collaboration with the Iranian mullahs regardless of what the official UN line is. But I wouldn't expect Israel to wait too long. They can't afford to. With the mullahs in charge, Iran is essentially one huge suicide bomber. With the people in charge, as in a democracy, that changes everything.

Posted by: mikem at February 23, 2005 08:09 PM (EzNXf)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
16kb generated in CPU 0.0135, elapsed 0.15 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.1426 seconds, 145 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.