May 01, 2006

United 93

May 1 - I needed to see the movie because I needed to pay tribute to the passengers and crew of Flight 93. It was really that simple.

The theatre seemed empty -- only about a quarter full. Many attended alone. The audience was silent even before the lights were lowered and remained hushed as they filed out after the movie. It was respectful and eerie.

The movie did not cause me to "relive Sept. 11" but rather to live through those elements which we learned of days afterward. I did find a curious solace in the reminder that the air controllers, FAA and even the military comprehended the magnitude and intent of events at the same moment as did we all.

The movie did not renew my rage so much as intensify the burden I accepted when I first learned of the defiant and desperate choice the passengers and crew made to retake the plane and avert another attack -- when I instictively knew that I needed to be among those who, in the words of Lincoln, would be "dedicated to the great task remaining before us--that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion."

Each will take something different from United 93 and no, I really haven't adequate words for what I took, but there are two essays that do: Right Wing Prof masterfully takes us from the movie to the Shanksville memorial and Gerard Vanderleun invokes a different scene at another site: those early memorials in New York constructed from flyers of the missing on fences and candlewax on sidewalks. I think much is said about the events within the movie by the descriptions and pictures of the imprompteau tributes at both sites which ache of loss and resound in thanks far more poignantly than any architect or committee could impose, and therein too lies the power of the movie: the only offering is one of stark events which do not condescend to explain or rationalize, and thus it respects the ordinary person.

Gerard's awed definition of heroism encompasses the firefighters and police as well as those on Flight 93 whose response to danger was to act, and it's much too good not to quote:

What I know in my heart, but what always escapes my understanding until something like this film renews it, is that heroism is a virtue that most often appears among us not descending from some mythic pantheon, but rising up out of the ordinary earth and ordinary hearts when the moment calls for actions extraordinary.
They chose not death but to fight for their lives and to save those unknown others who would die if they failed, and therein lies an important distinction that has sometimes been lost these past few years: the only ones who had chosen suicide and murder were the hijackers, and they cannot be allowed to win. We -- I -- won't let them.

(Right wing prof link via a succinct but brilliant entry at It comes in pints .)

Posted by: Debbye at 09:21 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 517 words, total size 3 kb.

1 I, too, found it hard to put in words my reaction to this fantastic film .. I'm glad I got up the nerve to see it, but I must confess that, knowing how it would all end, I found the final act to be very, very hard to watch, and indeed had to turn away from the screen at some points

Posted by: Keith Demko at May 01, 2006 04:05 PM (y6n8O)

2 I wont be seeing this movie. Not because I am not respectful of those who died that day, or have no time for the US. On the contrary, I have the utmost respect for the United States and the War on Terror. I just cannot bring myself to relive that day. I was entering the US in my rig heading to Lockport NY. I saw Americans hovering around radio at the factory I pick up at much in the way I imagine they did when FDR was announcing they declared war on Japan for Pearl Harbor. I saw the anger, the outrage and some fear in those men, who were friends, but were very patriotic and looking for some ass to kick that day. That memory has stuck with me, for that day I knew I was a "foreigner" and for a brief flash, I knew that underneath the easy friendliness of Americans, there is a steel in there that will fight no matter what, until death or victory. I saw it, and I want nothing to change that memory or my feelings of that horrible day. Canadians I think should see it, at least those pinheads who seem to forget why Bush has the attitude he has. America was attacked that day, and unlike Clinton, Bush is determined to do something to right the wrong. Now I may not agree with everything that he has done, but I respect him for not wanting to happen again on his watch, and I have the respect I have for America for not rolling over and taking it, like Clinton did when the embassy was attacked, like the Americans who were attacked at the residence in Saudi Arabia, and those sailors at the USS Cole.

Posted by: Mark in Bowmanville at May 04, 2006 05:31 PM (1EEyj)

3 Mark, you've nailed several nail with your words. A lot of people have not seen it for precisely the reasons you cite, and there have been a few times when I wished I hadn't seen it. As Keith notes (above) the emotional churning was such that it defies words - surely the highest praise any blogger can write. One thing the movie accomplishes is that, by simply presenting the stark events of the day, it dares those who have rationalized and excused those who organized and participated in the attack -- you know, the "Yes, but" and "root cause" crowd - to justify the aloof status they have accorded themselves. The rest of us grieve, marshall our steel, and carry the fight forward because, although it may not be the best choice, it's the only choice.

Posted by: Debbye at May 04, 2006 06:01 PM (k9kOc)

4 I wish Neil Young would go see the movie. . .

Posted by: Nik at May 04, 2006 09:35 PM (WCOLr)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
17kb generated in CPU 0.0119, elapsed 0.0847 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.078 seconds, 146 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.