July 02, 2004
Robert calls the BBC on their dimestore punditry. One excerpt:
But never fear, the BBC belatedly edited (without comment and admission) the word nagging to the far less shrewish word lobbying. Aren't they special?One is the pressure from right-wing Christian groups in the US, who have taken up the cause of their fellow Christians in Sudan."Nagging"? She actually wrote, "nagging." Well, darn it, but slavery and sharia tend to make the open-minded, democratic and, yes, even "right-wing Christians", a bit tense. It might even lead some to "nag" . . . and one would think that might be a tad understandable.Their nagging - on the issues of slavery and the forcible imposition of Sharia law - helped get sanctions imposed on Sudan in 1997. . .
It is getting harder and harder to keep up with the BBC. Since the item clearly indicates annoyance with (and perhaps even condemnation of) the nagging lobbying of the right-wing Christians on the issues of slavery and sharia in Sudan, does that mean the BBC is pro-slavery? Or maybe that they are willing to tolerate slavery as an expression of diversity?
Oh well, the BBC got all bases covered for whatever happens in Sudan. It will be about the oil, right-wing Christians, and cited as another failure in Bush diplomacy (but not U.N. diplomacy. Never that.)
(Note that the BBC item was written before Annan's visit to the hastily abandoned refugee camp in Sudan.)
Posted by: Debbye at
07:05 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 298 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: John H at July 03, 2004 07:26 AM (z9S2S)
Posted by: Debbye at July 03, 2004 08:47 AM (ck92f)
64 queries taking 0.0873 seconds, 144 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.