February 26, 2006

"We're all racial profilers now"

Feb. 26 - Munu changes servers (insert mumbled techno-stuff) and I too had difficulty logging on but everything seems to be back to normal.

As weeks go, last week was a sorry example of our ability to differentiate between the war on terror and fear of all things Arab. I am referring, of course, to the sensationalist fear-mongering over the sale of a British company to a company run out of the UAE and both Democrats and Republicans should be ashamed of themselves. I'm just a private citizen and even I know that security at ports is run by federal agencies not private ones, so why don't U.S. Senators? As someone quipped, "We're all racial profilers now."

Crucial to al Qaeda's successful attacks has been the recruitment of and deployment of home-based terrorists. The attacks in New York, Madrid and London were performed by people residing in those countries and, although security in ports remains a gaping question, so does security in chemical factories, electrical plants, subways, and just about everywhere. Fighting the war on terror while also retaining our society as an open one remains the paradox and the challenge.

Has everyone already picked up on the fact that the same company that has raised such alarms in the U.S. already leases a container facility in Vancouver?

Duncan Wilson, spokesman for the Vancouver Port Authority - basically P&O Canada's landlord - said security at the port is the responsibility of the RCMP, the local police and the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency, whose agents inspect containers.

[...]

"It's a business arrangement. Our other terminals are also operated by offshore companies."

So do we want to isolate all Arabs, or encourage Arabs to join in the effort to isolate terrorists?

Isn't it curious that the American news media which, with only a few exceptions, declined to publish the Danish cartoons (although I did see two of them broadcast by Fox News during a clip about the support demonstration in front of the Danish Embassy in D.C.) yet was so willing to misinform the public about the sale of the British company to a Dubai based concern? I guess they figure it's safer to target our allies than to annoy our enemies ...

Posted by: Debbye at 06:09 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 379 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Just reading up on the list of targets that Iran has claimed to have missals trained on in the Americas and Australia. It got me wondering about Iran's flotilla of various ships. As an oil rich nation, there are no doubt ships afloat on the seven seas that are owned or leased by Iran. Seems to me they should be boarded by surprise and without warning by Nato nations to verify what missals or weapons may be hidden in the hulls of those vessels. Australia and the Americas are far flung targets. Iran's weapons must be delivered from ships or airliners to be effective. Only 12% of all shipping containers are at risk of government inspection in North American ports. What are the chances of a mushroom cloud and a green glow emanating from containers sitting on our docks both Atlantic and Pacific. Saudi Arabia is ruled by a privileged group headed by a supposed king. There is no freedom of speech or dress in the country. Women in bourkahs are not allowed to shop in little stores and boutiques because the isles are too narrow and they could brush against a male shopper. Super stores and malls are permitted for women's shopping. http://tinyurl.com/gal3e Peace and democracy must strike fear into ruler kings who have an iron rule in their oil-rich countries. That may explain the orchestrated plot to incite riots and embassy burnings and killings using the excuse of Muhammad themed cartoons. http://tinyurl.com/s5npf What better way to impede the growing strength of infant democracy in Afghanistan and Iraq? The unions who run our ports in Canada and the US are corrupt. However, I am not comfortable with the scale of problems that will result when our ports are turned over to those who can speak to each other in a virtual secret code. TG

Posted by: TonyGuitar at February 27, 2006 01:52 AM (rmMzv)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
15kb generated in CPU 0.0277, elapsed 0.1553 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.138 seconds, 143 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.