October 21, 2005

The real scandal in Dingwall's "approved" expenses

Oct. 21 - David Dingwall explains his expenses and in one respect he is entirely correct: his expenses were approved by the Canadian Mint's Board of Directors.

But that's the point! The fact that those "expenses" were "approved" is a real scandal as much as is the appointment of political hacks who feel it necessary to pad their income by lobbying for contracts for which lobbying is forbidden.

So why is Dingwall getting severance pay instead of jail time? (I know why; just let me emote!)

Patronage appointments lead to corruption. The resistance by the political parties to legislate having such appointments be made strictly on merit and qualifications is why many are indifferent or even hostile to politics, and when the argument devolves to "give the other side an opportunity to appoint their own thieving cronies" then we are well past cynicism and apathy and into a level of contempt that can kill the heart of a country.

Shoot. For. The. Stars. Demand competence, accountability and honesty from all appointed officials. Taxpayers deserve no less.

Posted by: Debbye at 05:00 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 190 words, total size 1 kb.

1 The Mint's board... exactly. During Mansbridge , Chantal and Gunter exchange, Gunter brings up the real question, who are the dipsticks that approve this ivory tower arrogant largess with taxpayer's money? Dingwall's, Trudeau-like arrogance with, * entitlrments, my entitlements!* No mention of the overblown amounts involved. The dollar amount arrived at by his board member buddies. These prima-donnas write in gigantic pay-out amounts for each other, and we, the potato farmers, say, * uh... it's written, guess it must be right eh?* What total hogwash. 73s TG

Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 21, 2005 08:24 AM (rmMzv)

2 I am afraid Dingwall's powerful ability to concentrate and think on his feet under gunfire is going to cost the taxpayers more money. He reminds me so much of Trudeau and the steel trap mind honed by a jesuite education. I see this going the way of the Mulrooney trial. Emotional and correct accusations but without ironclad framing, leading to awards paid out to Dingwall, in this case. I watched the questioning on CPAC and saw Dingwall leathally tear apart his accusers arguments. Too bad, but there are many worthy opponents in the Librano army. That explains their increasing iron grip on the controls of the good ship Canada. Just glancing over the first 10 to 20 entries will amaze you when you enter Whistle Blower in the search window at http://www.technorati.com You will get a return of 3,922 entries, but you only need to look at the first 10 - 20 to get an idea of the scope of Whistle Blower Protection. I thought I knew a lot about it, but this surprised me. This stuff is like reading a wide ranging expose. Fascination! Technorati is a fun site anyway, where you can lay claim to your blogsite and get lots of feedback. Later, look at URLTrends.com, also, ‘way above average. 73s

Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 22, 2005 03:13 AM (rmMzv)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
15kb generated in CPU 0.013, elapsed 0.0899 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.081 seconds, 144 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.