September 28, 2005
The Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) lies at the center of the allegations in Entry #1:
After JD Irving Limited received $700,000 in approved funding from ACOA, they donated $100,000 to Paul Martin's leadership campaign.
Oxford Frozen Foods received $1,600,000 in 2003 from ACOA, and donated at least $50,000 to Martin's leadership campaign.
Keep in mind that the list of donors has vanished from official Canadian government archives (fortunately, Google's snapshot images endure.)
And then there's TESMA, which received received $2,600,000 from ACOA and then donated $15,000 to the leadership campaign.
Is it just me? Either these corporations are so needy that they require taxpayer subsidies or they are so financially secure that they can afford to make political contributions. I don't see a middle ground which is also ethical and, to all appearances, this is a quid pro quo arrangement and the taxpayers are footing the bill.
Entry #2 on Toronto Tory's list concerns something I alluded to earlier: Martin's dilemma in trying to sandwich the date for the next election between reports on audits. I should have included trial dates!
The Earnscliffe Strategy Group has long been associated with Paul Martin, and the article $10M in federal funds go to firm linked to PM in today's Ottawa Citizen brings new figures:
The Earnscliffe Strategy Group, an Ottawa consulting firm with close political ties to Prime Minister Paul Martin, has received more than $10 million in federal government money since the Liberals took power, new documents show.Additionally, there's been a lot of speculation that Earnscliffe is Martin's Adscam, with contracts going out for little or no work.And another Ottawa polling firm that has sometimes worked with Earnscliffe received more than $61 million in the same period.
Ottawa-based EKOS Research was awarded more than 1,600 contracts over the 111/2-year period, mostly for public opinion research.
The work was done for various departments, agencies and Crown corporations.
Records tabled in the House of Commons on Monday show that Earnscliffe and its affiliates have received 269 contracts, amendments and standing offers since 1993.
During Mr. Martin's years as finance minister, his department repeatedly hired Earnscliffe to do polling and focus groups and provide communications advice, often in advance of federal budgets.
The new records show that Earnscliffe received just under $2 million from the Finance Department alone.
The finance contracts last year became the subject of a political storm as a former public works official alleged that the tendering was specially tailored to ensure the work always went to Earnscliffe. The firm denied the allegation.
Most of the finance work was done by Earnscliffe senior partners David Herle, who ran Mr. Martin's 1990 leadership bid, and Elly Alboim, a former CBC producer.
The apparent conflict of interest hides another weakness in the Martin government. All governments pay heed to public opinion, but public opinion is usually concerned with short term objectives and governments that lead are presumed to take a longer view.
When public opinion dominates decision-making we end up with a government that hesitates, fumbles and, shall we say, dithers. Harsher types might call it opportunism, something we expect in political parties but reject in governments.
Posted by: Debbye at
06:58 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 596 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Toronto Tory at September 29, 2005 12:14 PM (nHgTe)
Posted by: Debbye at September 29, 2005 08:21 PM (prfk3)
64 queries taking 0.1153 seconds, 144 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.