March 30, 2005
Don't mess with Ann
Mar. 30 - Not entirely a surprise: Ann Coulter causes stir at KU although the headline is misleading - usually, it's the hecklers who are said to cause the stir.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Or maybe they didn't approve of her solution:
"Could 10 of the largest College Republicans start walking up and down the aisles and start removing anyone shouting?" Coulter asked.(Link via Drudge Report.)
Posted by: Debbye at
03:17 PM
| Comments (23)
| Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
1
She should have thrust her fist-sized AdamÂ’s apple at them. That would have created quite a stir.
Also: Ann Coulter is not a real person. I have it on good authority that she's a project undertaken by a vegan art collective. The real life "Ann Coulter" was a previously unemployed car show model who joined the collective and gives voice to their "opinions". (her columns are written by a gender-queer couple and an Inuit working in tandem throughout the night)
"Ann Coulter" is a neo-Dadaist attempt to destroy political discourse in the United States by having Ann become more and more unhinged and see how many of you suckers still buy it.
It's brilliant political humor once you get the joke.
Too bad none of you nuts do.
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 30, 2005 04:47 PM (t+KkC)
2
You have a real problem with gays, don't you, Blackglasses? I noticed that you have used the Adams apple remark several times. I guess you became frustrated that others did not congratulate you on your Canadian attempt at humor and decided to just come right out with the "queer" remark. Between your homoerotic descriptions of other commenters and your frequent citing of homosexuals of both genders, it is obvious that you are a self-hater.
Your emotions are fully validated.
Posted by: mikem at March 30, 2005 06:02 PM (EzNXf)
3
Big Macs are tasty.
So is lowering the discourse into childish name calling.
I win
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 30, 2005 06:49 PM (t+KkC)
4
"So is lowering the discourse into childish name calling."
You are delightfully clueless. If you were a child we would all be remarking on how cute your lack of awareness is, but as an adult it is just sad.
Posted by: mikem at March 30, 2005 07:10 PM (EzNXf)
5
I am amazed that anyone would pay Ann Coulter $25,000 for a lecture that was supposed to be "funny".
I saw her in a CBC interview and she was beligerent and mean spirited. I hope the CBC did not pay her that amount, because the money could have been much better applied elsewhere where it could have done some good.
Besides, you could get a whole group of better commedians at Yuk Yuk's to perform all evening for perhaps $4,000 or $5,000 and that would have included free beer for the House.
And what is Ann Coulter's actual point? Well, she thinks that Ted Kennedy is overweight and that its funny to make fun of him.
No wonder so many people who have seen her have dismissed her as a stupid bitch. And indeed, from the looks of it, not a very rich, silly bitch.
Posted by: Joe Green at March 30, 2005 08:10 PM (5dXW9)
6
Meanwhile Joe Green is hilarious and he's doing it for free!
Posted by: TimR at March 30, 2005 10:00 PM (rr+yX)
7
"You are delightfully clueless. If you were a child we would all be remarking on how cute your lack of awareness is, but as an adult it is just sad.
Posted by mikem"
Hmm...You are delightfully clueless. If you were a child we would all be remarking on how cute your lack of awareness is, but as an adult it is just sad.
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 30, 2005 10:12 PM (t+KkC)
8
Well, Joe, at least we now know what is lacking in your life.
After a great deal of mental strain and consideration of Ann Coulter's writings, the best that the 'tolerant' Canadian can come up with is that she "is a stupid bitch" and "not a very rich, silly bitch".
Why is it so difficult to find a male Canadian who can state a criticism about a woman without regressing to Neanderthal misogyny?
With Blackglasses' remarks in another thread about "queers" and "Ann Coulter's Adams apple", maybe we should give up on expecting any sort of civilized discussion from such a backward people
Posted by: mikem at March 30, 2005 10:25 PM (EzNXf)
9
There is another brilliant Canadian on the loose: Blackglasses, showing off how he can repeat what an American says. And he's only 23 years old!
A few more years and Canadians will graduate to "I know you are but what am I?" and "I'm rubber, you're glue..."
Posted by: mikem at March 30, 2005 10:37 PM (EzNXf)
10
Round the clock updates and obsessive checking brought to you today by mikem!
PS: did i upset you when i made fun of Annie?
I know that her main selling point is that she is supposed to be "sexy" and "stunning"- after all, she says abosoultely nothing worth repeating, except as an elaborate joke-but seriously she's not that attractive. And since she makes fun of appearences, then it is fair game to do the same.
Look at those freakish legs, those simian-like hands and monsterous face (as well as Adam's apple).
Ew.
Sorry for runing your elaboarte fanatsy involving Ann, fishnet stockings, a pile of bricks and a copy of the NSS 2002 infront of a roaring fire.
* Please attack this part and this part only. Thank you.
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 30, 2005 11:39 PM (t+KkC)
11
"Sorry for runing [sic] your elaboarte [sic] fanatsy [sic] involving Ann,..."
You spelled five out eight words correctly, Blackglasses. Good Boy!
Canada, just showing off. Visit us tooday!
Posted by: mikem at March 31, 2005 12:04 AM (EzNXf)
12
Awesome.
Can i post my essays here and have you speel check them? I mean, that's all you do now.
(PS: I can't wait for your overly emotive, insincere and, quite frankly, hilarious posts today once begin jerking off to FOX and its 24 hour feed)
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 31, 2005 10:43 AM (t+KkC)
13
It bodes well for your self esteem that you take pride in laziness and ignorance.
Posted by: mikem at March 31, 2005 11:27 AM (EzNXf)
14
last word.
I win
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 31, 2005 12:47 PM (t+KkC)
15
"last word. I win"
That standard of excellence explains a lot about the dearth of intelligent comment from our Canadian neighbors. Simple goals please simple minds.
Posted by: mikem at March 31, 2005 01:51 PM (EzNXf)
16
That standard of excellence explains a lot about the dearth of intelligent comment from our American neighbors. Simple goals please simple minds- as well as FOX News.
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 31, 2005 05:18 PM (t+KkC)
17
Nice comeback, by your standards I guess. I'm always impressed when my grandchildren reach the age where they can imitate and mimic others. As aggravating as it is, it is somewhat cute. Of course, in America we outgrow that stage within a few months. In Canada it seems to be a lifetime survival mechanism.
Posted by: mikem at March 31, 2005 06:37 PM (EzNXf)
18
new angle? old immature man participating in a childish flame war.
That's sadder than you defending Hawaii from the Vietcong.
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 31, 2005 08:33 PM (t+KkC)
19
I never said I fought the Vietcong. Is that yet another false accusation you are making?
Do you realize how pathetic it sounds for someone who has never served to be accusing someone who has of cowardice for not having served in a combat zone?
You wouldn't make it three days in the service. You would get caught stealing from your buddy and then you would cry at how unfair it was that you were caught.
Posted by: mikem at March 31, 2005 09:11 PM (EzNXf)
20
"Charlie's overruning the bar!!! CALL IN AIR SUPPORT!"
Posted by: Blackglasses at April 01, 2005 02:05 AM (t+KkC)
21
Air support is here, and I'm bombing your ass off this site, Blackglasses.
Posted by: Debbye at April 01, 2005 08:17 AM (I0F6J)
22
Mike, why all the anti-Canadian comments? Childish anti-american drivel from Blackglasses and Joe Green shouldn't give you a carte blanche to insult the rest of us.
Posted by: Dougm at April 01, 2005 10:46 AM (XlMBl)
23
Fair enough, Dougm. I would have the same reaction as you. But you are seeing things several months into a constant drumbeat of what I view as ridiculous smug generalizations and self serving stereotypes about Americans and America. Some of my anti-Canadian remarks, and I think that is a fair description, are directed at Canadian policy and actions, but many are simply meant to get someone Canadian to disown hateful (and I mean hateful, not just sharp) comments by another Canadian. Except for very recently, that has not happened.
I think you have a valid point, from your perspective.
Posted by: mikem at April 01, 2005 01:24 PM (EzNXf)
22kb generated in CPU 0.0153, elapsed 0.0965 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.0857 seconds, 165 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
64 queries taking 0.0857 seconds, 165 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
