October 21, 2005

"Do these people not feel the shame and disgrace that shroud them?"

Oct. 21 - Lots of people should feel shame these days for things that have been done, things that have not been done or said, and things that should be done but most likely will not be done.

'Omran Salman has written about the continuing extermination of Shi'ites in Iraq and attacks the silence of Sunnis there and that of Arab journalists and statesmen throughout the Mideast: "Aren't the Arabs Ashamed When Some of Them Massacre Iraqi Citizens?":

"What can we say in light of the attitude of the Arab media [in general] and the Arab satellite channels in particular, which report the killings, the slaughters, and the suicide bombings among Iraqi citizens coolly, treating them as routine events [and] as part of what has been termed 'the series of [acts of] violence in Iraq?'

"The war being waged by the Al-Qaeda organization and the terrorists against the Shi'ites in Iraq is among the acts of collective extermination, which is rare in modern history. There has been no case in the past in which somebody has declared a similar war against a race or a group as a whole, except [for the case of] Nazi Germany against the Jews...

"The Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq and similar [bodies] in Arab countries have issued dozens of fatwas about current political issues, but have not issued even a single fatwa declaring bin Laden, Al-Zawahiri, or Al-Zarqawi to be infidels because of their killing of the Shi'ites."

Salman could have included much of the Western media in his denunciation because they too have failed to place the targeted murders in the context of al Zarqawi's stated purpose, preferring to pretend that the bombings of civilians is part of the "insurgency."

Since we're on the subject of shame, the media silence about the recent Iraq referendum has been deafening, and Oliver North does some sharpshooting in The purple finger effect:

The same potentates of the press who focused for weeks on hanging chads in Florida five years ago widely ignored one of the most dramatic political events of our time. In the midst of a bloody war, politicians in an Islamic country spent seven months drafting their own constitution and then sent it to their people for ratification.
More shame: the U.N. report on the assassination of Rafik Hariri has concluded that Syrian officials were behind the bomb that killed Hariri and
CNN was able to obtain a copy of the report given Thursday to U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan and Security Council members, which lists the names of the men accused of planning the February 14, 2005, bombing that killed Hariri and 22 other people.

The names were not in copies of the report released for general distribution.

In addition to Maher Assad, the Syrian president's brother, those investigating Hariri's death accused Assef Shawkat, the president's brother-in-law; Jamil al-Sayyed, head of Lebanese intelligence; Hassan Khalil, former head of Syrian intelligence; and Bahjat Suleyman, a personal friend of the Syrian president, as participating in planning the assassination.

A witness, who is Syrian but lives in Lebanon, and who claims to have worked for Syrian intelligence services in Lebanon, told investigators that about two weeks before Security Council Resolution 1559 was passed, the officials decided to assassinate Hariri.

President Bush spoke about the report today:
"Today, a serious report came out that requires the world to look at it very carefully and respond accordingly," he said. "The report is deeply disturbing."

Bush said he instructed Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to "call upon the United Nations to convene a session as quickly as possible to deal with this very serious matter."

The U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., John Bolton, will be meeting with the author of the report, German prosecutor Detleve Mehlis, Friday morning, and will urge the U.N. Security Council to meet and "consider options." That's all very nice, but the U.N.'s options are extremely limited. They can't ignore their own report, but would the General Assembly pass a resolution condemning Syria? and then ... what?

Lebanon is a member of the agency of "francophonie" as are France, Romania and Benin, nations which currently sit on the UNSC, and thus one would expect them to exhibit some degree of solidarity, right? [As an aside, Canada, New Brunswick and Quebec are also members of the agency of francophonie.]

One group that realistically might be able to exert pressure on Syria is the EU. They were quick to make overtures for increased trade with Syria after the U.S. Congress passed the Syria Accountability Act in 2004 and are thus in a position wherein they could at minimum impose sanctions. Right.

(Memri link via Newsbeat1)

Posted by: Debbye at 05:47 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 768 words, total size 6 kb.

1 Worrisome Librano Stealth === Bruce Cheadle story = Canadian Press === == Liberals announce post -Scandal Audit Rules == ================================= Liberal cabinet ministers are claiming their new reforms mark a fundamental shift in Canadian governance. Opposition MPs are crying foul. Ottawa will spend $40 million annually and hire up to 300 new auditors as it overhauls the way federal departments internally monitor their own programs, Treasury Board President Reg Alcock told a news conference. Some 158 separate measures, with another 80 promised in coming days, "will be some of the most fundamental changes in the internal oversight that any government in the world has made," Alcock claimed. "Prime Minister (Paul) Martin has set the bar very high for all of us." The hyperbole and timing of the announcement, if not its substance, had Liberal opponents gagging. "It's totally designed to pre-empt Gomery," said NDP veteran Ed Broadbent. ===== Oct 22/05 Canadian Press on Canada.com ==== ==================================== I hope Ed Broadbent is wrong this time. Gomery will be putting a report of great interest on display in 10 days. Broadbent seems to suggest the curtains my be pulled so we may be denied A chance to read Gomery’s report. Hope not TG

Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 22, 2005 11:06 AM (rmMzv)

2 Here's a question: What about the shame of Americans foaming at the mouth in April 2003 to launch a war of aggression against a country that was doing nothing whatsoever to provoke them? Yeah, be really proud of that you nation of no-balls bullies, and let's see you try to spread "peace and freedom" to North Korea or Iran... What's that conspicuous shameful silence regarding them? Why does one set of made-up "rules" apply to a defenseless country that has resources you want but an entirely different set apply to a country that would chew up the candy-ass U.S. "military" and spit it out? That's called being a cowardly bully.

Posted by: Lemeul at October 27, 2005 11:52 AM (6/LqO)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
19kb generated in CPU 0.0109, elapsed 0.0865 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.0757 seconds, 144 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.