June 22, 2004

A Canadian soldier speaks out

June 22 - Earl McCrae of the Ottawa Sun interviews a Canadian soldier who delivers a blistering attack on PM Martin and all those who are trying to redefine the military and their role in PM outdated, not our troops:

"I voluntarily became a soldier knowing that it might one day mean me losing my life for Canada. Can Martin say that? When did he ever serve? He's a fat cat billionaire without a clue about what it means to be a soldier. What he said was an insult to every man and woman in this country in uniform. All of them better Canadians than him. But what's he care? Our military size has been so shrunk he figures the Liberals don't need their votes to win."

The soldier was reacting to a front-page newspaper story he read on the weekend in which Martin, during an interview, attacked Conservative leader Stephen Harper's plans for the Canadian military. Martin, according to the article, saying Harper would impose a warlike "ready aye ready" philosophy that is out of vogue in today's Canadian society.

"I went ballistic. Harper never served, either, but he's a hell of a lot more understanding and realistic as to what the armed forces should be than that ignorant fool Martin. As for outdated, it's old Martin who's outdated. What does he think the role of Canadian soldiers is? To hand out candies? Carry toy guns? Just sit around and watch? Being trained and ready to fight and kill the enemy in the defence of freedom is what soldiers willingly do.

"Men and women aren't forced to sign up, they sign up because they're willing and want to be warriors, and somebody tell Martin they're damn fine people, not thugs like he makes it sound. He insults every soldier in this country as well as their families."

The soldier slammed the Liberals' anti-Harper ad on TV portraying him as a warmonger. "The Canadian soldiers jumping out of armoured personnel carriers and attacking with their weapons -- just what the hell is wrong with that? They're soldiers, for krissake. Does the scene turn Martin's weak, little, stomach? Does he hope Canadians will puke with disgust over it? If they do, then we're a nation of pussycats and in real trouble.

Read the whole thing.

The Liberal Party has treated the Canadian Forces abominably. There are a lot of weepy words on Rememberance Day but little else. Their refusal to fund and equip the Canadian Forces should have had a detrimental affect on recruitment yet we still have steadfast volunteers, especially since Sept. 11, of excellent men and women who understand that their beloved Canada is at risk and are willing to defend and protect it.

I've made no secret of my respect and gratitude for all those who serve, but I have to admit a slightly higher awe for the Canadian soldier, who despite the lack of respect they are accorded by the current government, have done whatever they were asked cheerfully and made do with what they had or could procure, including scrounging up paint in Afghanistan to provide suitable camouflage for desert terrain on their blankets and uniforms. (For Americans: there were no uniforms available for desert terrain, so they painted their forest green uniforms and blankets with desert colours.)

I think the Liberals have underestimated the loyalty and pride the Canadian people accord to their armed forces. Martin's unfortunate comments were meant to be a shot at Harper's support for the USA in Iraq, but the shot went astray and struck at the courage and readiness of the Canadian soldier.

(Via Jack's Newswatch.)

Posted by: Debbye at 05:44 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 614 words, total size 4 kb.

1 D- Unfortunately I think y'all are screwed. I do not see anything concrete that reverses Canada's march toward becoming New Zealand's military. The mindset seems to be "us need a military? Whatever on earth for." Such a proud tradition down the tubes. Sea Kings anyone?

Posted by: Richard Cook at June 24, 2004 04:12 PM (Km34P)

2 Richard, your reference to the Sea Kings is quite apt: the contract to replace them was cancelled 10 years ago, and a Senate committee (there is a Senate up here, but it's by appointment only) said that it will take at least 10 years from now to build the military up to former strength. The situation isn't irreversible, but first Canadians would have to recognize that they don't even do the international peacekeeping duties they think they do, and that would destroy another pillar of Canadian national pride.

Posted by: Debbye at June 25, 2004 09:20 PM (hKw3P)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
16kb generated in CPU 0.0124, elapsed 0.085 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.077 seconds, 144 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.