November 23, 2004

150 sex abuse cases charges in Congo Peacekeeping

Nov. 23 - Michelle Malkin calls it The U.N.'s Abu Ghraib, citing an item from Reuters: U.N.: 150 sex abuse charges in Congo peacekeeping.

The United Nations is investigating about 150 allegations of sexual abuse by U.N. civilian staff and soldiers in the Congo, some of them recorded on videotape, a senior U.N. official said on Monday.

The accusations include pedophilia, rape and prostitution, said Jane Holl Lute, an assistant secretary-general in the peacekeeping department.

Lute, an American, said there was photographic and video evidence for some of the allegations and most of the charges came to light since the spring.

[...]

In May the United Nations reported some 30 cases of abuse among peacekeepers in the northeastern town of Bunia, where half of the more than 10,000 soldiers are stationed.

Last month, one French soldier and two Tunisian soldiers were sent home, U.N. officials said. Three U.N. civilian staff were suspended.

So action has been taken: some peacekeepers have been sent home, 3 U.N. staff members were suspended and an inquiry has been initiated. It resembles Abu Ghraib because here too the story was broken after corrective measures had begun, but I think it unlikely the photographic and video evidence will receive the same (if any) exposure as the infamous ones from Abu Ghraib (I wouldn't want to be the only person not to say that!)

Needless to say Kofi Annan is shocked and outraged, but as the article notes,

The United Nations has jurisdiction over its civilian staff but troops are contributed by individual nations. Consequently, the world body has only the power to demand a specific country repatriate an accused soldier and punish him or her at home.
The fact that Reuters has reported on it is significant, but this isn't the first report of sexual abuse by U.N. peacekeeping troops in the Congo. When I followed a trackback to Malkin's post to U.N. Seraglio in the Congo getting little attention at Captain's Quarters he cited his May 25 post UN Implements Sex-For-Food Program In The Congo from a report in The Independent (which is possibily about cases referred to in the 6th paragraph of the Reuters article?)

It will be easy to blame Kofi Annan for the growing pile of scandals that are plaguing the U.N. from Oil-to-Food, to possible attempts by IAEA head Mohammed El Baradei to influence the U.S. election, to the reports of misbehaviour at best and criminal behaviour at worst by the very troops sent to protect innocent people but which in fact victimize them. It will, in fact, be too easy to place the lion's share of blame onto one person and a few flunkies and then, feeling absolved, quickly move on.

But the problem isn't just Kofi Annan. The problem is the U.N. itself, which is composed of unelected, unscritinized, and unaccountable people. They presume to usurp moral authority from legally elected governments, pander to dictators and statists, and are as corruptible as all humans - and in that last all-important detail we find that dangerous flaw to which we are all subject (you know, the one about the inevitability of power corrupting mere mortals.)

I hope I'm not breaking any, er, blogiquette by posting a link to a May 2 Telegraph article UN threatens authors of 'racy' expose take from one of the Captain's commenters on the May post. The article says:

The United Nations has threatened to fire two officials who wrote an expose of sleaze and corruption during its peacekeeping missions of the 1990s.

Kofi Annan, the UN Secretary-General, is understood to have favoured an attempt to block publication of the memoir, Emergency Sex and Other Desperate Measures, a True Story from Hell on Earth, due to be published next month.

Still reeling from the Iraqi oil-for-food scandal, officials in the upper echelons of the UN are alarmed by the promised revelations of wild sex parties, petty corruption, and drug use - diversions that helped the peacekeepers to cope with alternating states of terror and boredom.

[...]

The co-authors, who met in Cambodia in 1993 and later worked in Haiti, Kosovo, Liberia and Somalia, claim that petty corruption over expense accounts and living allowances was rife.

Ms Postlewait was in her early thirties when she went on her first trip abroad for the UN, supervising elections in Cambodia. There, she soon worked out that she could save enough money from her expense account to set herself up nicely back in New York. In other frauds, UN staff were said to quote blackmarket currency exchange rates to pad out their expenses.

The authors also complain that they encountered "bureaucratic betrayal" on missions, as the UN allegedly struck cynical deals with corrupt local officials.

Much as we might fondly imagine otherwise, people who work for the U.N. are not saints but people with all the fallibilities - including greed and pride - that beset each of us.

(Via Michelle Malkin and following the trackback to Captain's Quarters.)

14:09 From this post at Friends of Saddam's, it seems AP has picked up the story with some notable additions:

The United Nations mission in Congo has about 10,500 soldiers and police as well as 1,000 international staff from 50 countries. It began in 1999. Investigators are now checking the 15 other U.N. peacekeeping missions around the world to see how widespread the problem is, Lute said.

Allegations of sex abuse and other crimes have dogged U.N. peacekeeping missions almost since their inception in 1948. It's been difficult to clamp down because the United Nations doesn't want to offend the relatively small number of nations who provide most of its peacekeeping troops.

[...]

In recent years, the United Nations has tried to clear up sex abuse problems by putting more emphasis on training peacekeepers - known as "blue helmets" for their distinctive headgear - and re-emphasizing codes of conduct.

But Lute said those efforts have not kept pace with the massive growth in peacekeeping missions, and their complexity - where soldiers often are deployed in highly volatile, lawless areas rather than manning clearly defined truce lines.

Lute said U.N. leaders were now determined to get tougher. On Friday, Secretary-General Kofi Annan said he was "absolutely outraged" by the allegations.

So-called "personnel conduct officers" have been sent to the missions in Congo, Burundi, Ivory Coast and Haiti. (Bolding added.)

That last sentence forces me to wonder if there have been allegations in those places as well.

Posted by: Debbye at 12:45 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 1078 words, total size 7 kb.

1 Can someone please tell me why all you neo-cons and American right wingers hate the UN? Its not like "THE UN ARMY" can invade your country or anything.

Posted by: Joey at November 23, 2004 10:54 PM (Ojo2r)

2 But the U.N. is in the way of our world domination you idiot... That's what neo-con's want! They want to RULE the world... militarily, economincally, culturally... That's what we neo-con's want. As for the kind of morons that read this webpage, they aren't real neo-cons... They probably don't even know who Billy Kristol is... They just read his ideas passed down through the dumb-filter, so any old religious nut moron, conservative hick can understand it.

Posted by: Ith at November 23, 2004 11:04 PM (Ojo2r)

3 Wait, Wait, Wait... I actually read a little bit of this article... You are complaining because the U.N. troops are committing sex assault???? OF COURSE SOLDIERS COMMIT SEX ASSAULT!!! IT'S WHAT SOLDIERS DO!!! FOR CENTURIES!!!! Don't you dare assume that Americans are immune... It's a universal problem. - Russians in Germany after WW2 - Americans in Vietnam - Americans in a dozen foreign countries right now, including the Phillipines and Japan. Sex Assault is a common problem amongst troops of ALL nations. What do you expect. These are complete idiots. These are guns for hire. What do you expect? Don't you dare be so narrow minded as to think this problem in the U.N. has anything to do with the United Nations as a functioning world governance body... It's simply a problem that all troops have from all countries.... The U.N. CANNOT be attacked for this anymore than any other standing army in the world... I'm a neo-con though, so fuck the U.N... But sex assault is a really pathetic line of attack on their credibility.

Posted by: Ith at November 23, 2004 11:32 PM (Ojo2r)

4 Yes, "sex assault" is probably common. But, but, it is very important that all this be brought to light. Why? Because the U.N. must be recognized for what it is, a seriously flawed organization, undeserving of the aura of holiness that too many would attribute to it.

Posted by: keith at November 24, 2004 09:15 AM (I2Ui5)

5 The descent of the left continues. Now I have two lefties (despite not-Ith's satiric claims to the contrary) justifying sexual abuse. The day before racism, now sexism. Can we all say "rock bottom?" Of course we can. Keith got it first try: the U.N. is a flawed organization of flawed humans that has seemingly forgotten its mortal status.

Posted by: Debbye at November 24, 2004 10:32 AM (iyM+8)

6 Whenever you get hit in succession by two loonies like those above, they're probably the same person. Just a thought. As for the UN, there are demolition experts who could drop those buildings so neatly that after a little cleanup you'd never know that corrupt society of kleptocrats was ever there!

Posted by: Jth at November 29, 2004 05:27 PM (92+2d)

7 I've wondered about that too, Jth, as well as wonder how long the U.N. would last without U.S. funding. Would all these wonderful, enlightened nations car enough about the U.N. to actually foot the bills? It would probably be on a par with the troops they commit to peacekeeping missions.

Posted by: Debbye at November 30, 2004 08:11 AM (MhshB)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
23kb generated in CPU 0.0583, elapsed 0.1397 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.1309 seconds, 149 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.