October 25, 2005
Rosa Parks 1913-2005
Rosa Parks and Dr. King
Oct. 25 - Rosa Parks, whose refusal to give up her seat to a white man sparked the Montgomery bus boycott in 1956, passed away yesterday at the age of 92. What words can possibly express the immense respect and admiration due this woman who, by a simple act of dignity, brought national attention to a deep injustice in our country thus prodding at and eventually awakening the conscience of that nation?
There was an additional layer to the issue: Mrs. Parks was a woman and it was considered a decent courtesy for a man to give up his seat for a woman, yet she was supposed to surrender her seat to him. It was impossible not to recognize that Mrs. Parks had been denied a common courtesy which her gender should have accorded her - if one considered her to be human. And, of course, that was the ultimate question.
I was too young to be fully aware of the boycott but as I grew older and learned more about Jim Crow laws (those laws mandating "separate but equal" facilities) I was incredulous - as perhaps only a child could be - when I learned that there were states that had laws requiring that, e.g., schools, hotels, drinking fountains, swimming pools, beaches and washrooms be segregated: there must be separate facilities for white people and "colored" people. Anyone's sense of fair play was further outraged when it was recognized that the reality was that there was not necessarily a duplication of services; for example, African-Americans were not allowed to drink out of water fountains marked "For Whites Only" but that did not necessarily mean that there was a water fountain nearby marked "For Coloreds Only." (The indignity worsens when we recall that the same lack of facilities held true for washrooms.)
Those times are thankfully in the past. They may be part of our history but they are past history, and although there are still racists in our midst they no longer have the acquiescence of the state. Which, again, brings us back to Rosa Parks.
The biography which CNN offers in the above link is adequate, but a better one is available here. Both articles note her involvement in the NAACP, but did you know that it was founded in 1909? (read the time line at that last link - you may find some surprises.)
There will likely be a great many public tributes over the next few days but I'd like to think that the better ones will be those many of us will be paying in our hearts to this woman who, with Dr. King, challenged us to be better Americans and better Christians and Jews.
Thank you, Mrs. Parks, and God bless you. You made us better.
Posted by: Debbye at
12:59 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 473 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I just had a complete Rosa Parks post eaten up and lost by mu.nu, but Rosa Parks is worth dpoing it all over again. [I'll save before posting this time].
Getting on a bus in Washington DC, cira 1962, I was rivited by the furtive behavior of a nice fortyish black lady. She got up from her mid-bus seat and moved to the back so that my seating choices would be wider.
I sat down behind the bus driver and looked out the window to conceal any emotion showing.
Being from Montreal where everyone respects everyone regardless of race colour or even Martian heritage, this behaviour was a shocking intro to southern social conditioning in the USA.
Just knowing that Rosa Parks contributed to earasing that condition is enough to make her a peerless hero to me.
I do not want to ever see any person of any heritage give up their bus seat to me with that scared look in their eye, ever again. TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 25, 2005 04:12 PM (rmMzv)
2
I'm truly amazed (humbled perhaps) at the effect one decent person can have on society. Mrs. Parks, you have left the world a better place. Thank you.
Posted by: John B at October 26, 2005 10:23 AM (ju7Wp)
3
I just finished adding 512 Mb to my Compaq Presario computer and I am delighted with the results. The three, [always on top], performance bars really tell the story too. Top real time bar is CPU demand, middle is memory and the third is virtual memory.
The two memory reserve bars are giving me more than double the head room I used to have and of course everything is quicker. Should have done this as soon as I got the Presario.
For a step by step of how to easily add memory , there is a pretty clear account of what I did at:
http://Anchorpin.Redpin.com So you can see how easy it is if you have not added a memory module yet.
The active graph bar that clearly shows how the computer has improved is called Cool Beans and it’s a perfect freeware program. It’s small, yet it gets all your computer specs and tells you how good your computer is as well. TG
http://my.Opera.com/T-G/
Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 27, 2005 03:22 AM (rmMzv)
4
You gotta hand it to Rosa Parks. It took a middle-aged black woman with tired feet to show America what a dungpile it is, and if America was ever even half of what it so obnoxiously claims to be nobody would've ever heard of Mrs. Parks because her noble effort would have been totally unneccessary.
Posted by: Terrence at October 27, 2005 11:37 AM (6/LqO)
5
You gotta hand it to Rosa Parks. It took a middle-aged black woman with tired feet to show America what a dungpile it is, and if America was ever even half of what it so obnoxiously claims to be nobody would've ever heard of Mrs. Parks because her noble effort would have been totally unneccessary and thus would've never happened.
Posted by: Terrence at October 27, 2005 11:37 AM (6/LqO)
6
New Trojan: Public Service Mention:
[Canadians who sign on for Afghanistan soldiers of fortune army.]
Hey, Drug addicts will sign up. There they can walk about in Heroin Heaven, carrying a lethal weapon and wearing Canadian government permission. Poppyfield nirvanna. Oh deliver me please.. eh?
Webroot just proved itself this morning. It caught 11 reporter cookies and one Back-door Trojan.
Not a bad find, when you consider Bill Gates scans for stuff here every am around 2. Google Webroot. It's just a few bucks or they may still have a free version.
I thought someone was poking about in my Compaqy1. Zapped him now!
Posted the Webroot screen [ small thumbnail] on http://My.Opera.com/T-G/
Terrence, don't worry about paying tribute to Rosa twice. She deserves it.
Some times a comment goes the long way around, pausing for a breath in China or random scanning in the Brock Mountain Security complex. Then it shows up a little after your second post..eh?
Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 27, 2005 02:46 PM (rmMzv)
7
Nice tribute. Isn't it just like our Liberal government to remain silent about the death of Rosa Parks?
Posted by: Al Gordon at October 28, 2005 11:45 PM (xIUY7)
8
Ha! Nice one, Al! What was Pierre Pettigrew doing instead - getting his hair
styled in Paris by a limp-wristed cheese-eating surrender monkey??
If only more people had Rosa Parks' bravery, the Palestinians would be defeated.
Posted by: Joan O'C at October 29, 2005 12:06 AM (xIUY7)
9
Completely OT, but, Debbye, you might want to check your e-mail... Just saying, is all...
Posted by: Paul Jané at October 31, 2005 04:52 AM (W1E5O)
10
Must be on one of those french vacations.
Posted by: Jay at November 01, 2005 11:09 PM (PIbeE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
It's not nice to lie to Congress
Oct. 25 - Last May British MP George Galloway scornfully
challenged Sen. Norm Coleman to produce evidence that he had received oil vouchers from Saddam Hussein during the former's testimony before the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations which at the time was investigating the U.N. Oil-for-Food Program. Well, the evidence been produced (
Senate panel accuses British lawmaker) and the U.S. Department of Justice will be asked to consider charging Galloway with perjury and obstruction of congressional proceedings.
The British newspaper, the Daily Telegraph, proclaims Galloway's wife 'received £100,000 from Iraqis':
The Palestinian-born wife of George Galloway, the Respect MP, is accused today of receiving $149,980 (about £100,000) derived from the United Nations Iraqi oil-for-food programme.
A report by an investigative committee of the United States Senate says the money was sent to the personal account of Amineh Abu Zayyad in August 2000.
[...]
The report includes bank records showing a paper trail from Saddam's ministries to Mrs Galloway. It states that the Iraqis handed several lucrative oil-for-food contracts to the Jordanian businessman Fawaz Zureikat, an old friend of the Galloways. A month later, on Aug 3, 2000, Mr Zureikat allegedly paid $150,000 minus a bank commission of $20 from his Citibank account number 500190207 into Mrs Galloway's account at the Arab Bank in Amman.
The senate team also says that a $15,666 payment had been made on the same date to a Bank of Scotland account belonging to Mr Galloway's spokesman, Ron McKay. Last night Mr McKay said he had no recollection of the alleged payment.
[...]
Senate staff said at a press conference yesterday that they would send their report to Britain and Jordan for possible action against the Galloways and Mr Zureikat.
George Galloway had been scheduled to go on tour in the eastern U.S. with
Jihad Jane and Cindy Sheehan but the trip was abrubtly cancelled last month.
Posted by: Debbye at
08:39 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 321 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Some blog (or a commenter on a blog) surmised shortly after Galloway's testimony that the Senate team (or some members therein) had set trap for Gorgeous George. That is - catch him in his own lie - it may have worked.
Posted by: John B at October 25, 2005 11:23 AM (ju7Wp)
2
That was me! (Heh, one of too many to count.)
Seriously, I think you're right, but what I think I recall is that it was someone, er, important (probably a nationally known columnist) who asserted that Galloway's testimony painted him into a corner.
Time to put pressure on Jordan. The answer to a lot of questions lie in the banking records over there.
Posted by: Debbye at October 25, 2005 01:38 PM (HGxLP)
3
Always knew it had to be that Galloway was a crook in addition to being a nutcase.
Posted by: Jay at October 25, 2005 04:06 PM (PIbeE)
4
As usual, the "neocons" are foaming at the mouth, wanting to attack one of their "enemies".
That "facts" are that Galloway has not been charged with ANYTHING, and that IF he were charged, he would be "innocent until proven guilty" in a Court of Law, and that would not be the Kangaroo Court that Emperor George II is creating, but it would be a REAL COURT at the Old Bailey in London.
As for these accounts from the US Senate, who believes it? The facts are that BOTH Republicans and Democrats were complicit in the lies about Iraq and its "threat" against the civilized world with nuclear, chemical and biological weapons that it did not have. All these Americans rushed off to war, and they did it for the Money. It does not matter if their politics were Republican or Democrat, what was voting here was their wallets.
Just look at Senator Joe Lieberman and ask yourself seriously what kind of a "Democrat" is he really, when you compare him to Franklin Roosevelt, or Harry Truman.
Posted by: Joe Green at October 25, 2005 06:37 PM (5dXW9)
5
Debbye:
Check Wretchard at Belmont Club - he had a good original analysis which he discussed yesterday in light of the new evidence. Partial excerpt below.
"The really striking thing about the Galloway's testimony as transcribed by the Information Clearing House is how the Senators and the Member of Parliament for Bethnal Green and Bow were pursuing a non-collision course. Galloway had come to score press and public relations points at which, by all accounts, he was successful at doing. But Senator Coleman and Levin seemed totally uninterested in responding to Galloway's sharp political jibes. It was almost as if the Senators were deaf to his political posturing. Instead, they focused exclusively and repeatedly on two things: Galloway's relationship with Fawaz Zureikat and Tariq Aziz. Zureikat was a board member of Galloway's Mariam foundation who is also implicated in the Oil For Food deals. Tariq Aziz was Saddam's vice president."
Yesterday's comment:
"(Speculation alert) It was Galloway's contempt for the intelligence and capability of his Senatorial pursuers that may have gotten him into this perjury mess in the first place. It wasn't enough to remain silent on his relationship with with Zureikat. Playing to his gallery, Galloway boomed, "I can assure you, Mr. Zureikat never gave me a penny from an oil deal, from a cake deal, from a bread deal, or from any deal." Nice touch about the cake and the bread. Perhaps he couldn't imagine, at the time, why these yokels were asking him simple questions that were beneath his level of rhetorical ability. Even today Galloway may think so little of his adversaries that he was willing to boast on BBC Radio that "I am ready to fly to the US today, if necessary, to face such a charge because it is simply false." He is as smart today as he was then."
http://fallbackbelmont.blogspot.com/
Joe Green:
Must hurt when one of your heroes is shown to be a liar on the payroll of Saddam eh?
Posted by: John B at October 26, 2005 10:30 AM (ju7Wp)
6
"...Galloway has not been charged with ANYTHING..."
Yet.
"...IF he were charged, he would be "innocent until proven guilty" in a Court of Law,"
Just like everyone else who winds up in prison. What is your point, exactly in invoking the legal preumpstion of innocence? Surely it's not that everyone has to presume he's innocent, which is one of my all-time major pet peeves. He's entitled to the presumption of innocence from the court and the jury, not from public opinion.
"...and that would not be the Kangaroo Court that Emperor George II is creating..."
What are you talking about? If Galloway were charged with perjury and/or obstruction of justice, he'd face those charges in a court created not by George W. Bush, but by the First Congress in the Judiciary Act of 1789, signed by George Washington.
"...but it would be a REAL COURT at the Old Bailey in London."
Um, why would the Central Criminal Court in London be the venue for the United States Department of Justice to prosecute a crime (or crimes) under US law, committed in the US? If Galloway were charged with perjury and/or obstruction of justice, he'd face trial in the US District Court for the District of Columbia, the court with jurisidiction over the alleged criminal acts. And why is that court any less a "REAL COURT" than the Old Bailey? Because its judges are picked by presidents (of both parties) subject to Senate confirmation, rather than by the unaccountable fiat of the Lord Chancellor?
Galloway engaged in self-righteous bluster because he's used to being a back-bencher in a legislature whose members are unaccustomed to separation of powers, where debate is more pointed and vigorous (and yes, more entertaining) precisely BECAUSE that's all that there is, and they're otherwise under the thumb of the executive. Norm Coleman didn't care about political point-scoring: he and his staff, mostly former prosecutors, set and baited the trap and Galloway waltzed right into it.
Posted by: Dave J at October 27, 2005 01:43 AM (8XpMm)
7
OK, this may seem flippant as regards all this heavy stuff, if you don't look at Ottawa , that is.
Volunteering for an experiment. I am very absent minded. You guys should send me about $15,666 and we'll run a test.
Call me in about six months and see if it skipped my mind. Check to see if I have forgoteen about it.
I promise, if my phone number is still the same and I have not moved, I'll give you an honest answer. I love doing research. TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 27, 2005 02:56 PM (rmMzv)
8
Someone's been away busy. In the mean time have a look at 3 not-so-hot photos of some gems an old guy I met at a kiosk is crafting.
Nice work. I'll have to do some close-in shots. http://bendgovernment.blogspot.com TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 29, 2005 01:01 PM (rmMzv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 21, 2005
What don't get they about "when the mission is completed?"
Oct. 21 - The
Washingto Post had an un-insightful item yesterday:
Rice Declines to Give Senators Timeline for Germany South Korea Iraq Withdrawal.
I could have included Bosnia/Serbia/Kosovo, Afghanistan and the Horn of Africa in the strike-outs, but it was already getting a tad long! (Feel free to add your own favourite "quagmire," but Los Angeles is off-limits!)
I hate to disappoint the Post, but most Americans understood going in that it would be a long-term committment. We also understood that sticking this through would meet our long-term objectives far more than cutting and running.
Having said that, it also grieves me that some of our best men and women are being killed and maimed over there. It just seems wrong that the intelligent idiots in their ivory towers babble on while those who many - including me - consider their betters are on the front lines.
Where are all those human shields, anyway? They would protect hospitals and electrical stations under Saddam's rule but not under Iraq home rule? Couldn't they at least protect the defense lawyers for Saddam's trial? (No link yet, but word has it that he has been found dead.) [07:45 - link now available here.
Posted by: Debbye at
06:26 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 220 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Funny how Sean Penn seems to have crawled back under the woodwork like the roach he is.
Posted by: Jay at October 22, 2005 01:35 AM (PIbeE)
2
Jay, I can't say I've missed Sean Penn! I'm guessing he hasn't tried to visit Saddam in jail - nor has Dan Rather, for that matter. Bunch of fair weather friends they turned out to be ... how typical of their kind.
Posted by: Debbye at October 24, 2005 09:20 AM (yegQF)
3
No, most Americans did NOT realize this would be a long-term commitment. Don't you even remember the garbage that was sold to you and the rest of the American sheeple in the run-up to this little farce in Iraq? Did Bush try to sell it by saying how tough it would be? Hell no, as none of the Bushites, with Bush included, thought it would be anything other than a walk-over of a defenseless country. Only Americans are so effing simple as to be buy into a war that involves the premise of it being an effortless, bloodless conquest while simultaneously being told Iraq is some kind of "grave, gathering threat" requiring immediate action. No, believe me, if the Bushites had any inkling this would turn out like it has they would've most likely not tried it, and the average American would have likewise withheld his approval of this venture if he knew it would be like this. In case you haven't noticed, you're losing and this debacle in Iraq has been a showcase of American "military" weakness. Two and a half years into this and they still can't control the airport road in Baghdad!! Pathetic!!
Posted by: Jeremiah at October 27, 2005 12:11 PM (6/LqO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Michael Yon on radio
Oct. 21 - Thanks to Kevin for this heads-up:
Pundit Review: Michael Yon This Sunday, 9 p.m. ET, on Pundit Review Radio. Mr. Yon in an embedded reporter (his current affiliation is with the
Weekly Standard) and his accounts and photos are markedly different from what we read on CNN or Fox.
If you haven't been following Mr. Yon's dispatches online, you can read them here and you might want to begin with this.
The post linked above at Pundit Review in turn links to WRKO and from there you can click on the "Listen Live" button. (I presume! If I'm wrong please let me know.)
I am supposed to work Sunday night, worse luck. Too bad I can't set something equivalent to a VCR for the broadcast, but I am looking forward to reading the reviews or, better, if anyone knows of a transcript of the interview please let me know.
Posted by: Debbye at
01:09 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 160 words, total size 1 kb.
October 18, 2005
I thought only beavers built wooden dams
Oct. 18 - The only real dam I've ever seen is Hoover Dam so I'm hardly an expert but even so I never imagined a
dam would be made of wood unless beavers were members of the construction crew.
Good luck to the folks in Taunton. After this passes, the owners might want to start thinking about upgrading.
Posted by: Debbye at
09:53 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 72 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The dam could burst all over your computer if you allow a trojan bearing *Skype* Email to go ahead. The warning is below.
C'mon, it's time to 'fess up. Libranos and NDP are both lame and badly hamstrung. They are a coalition. Not open and official, but a dependant partnership-ship all the same.
That's why real honest Liberals are voting in their own interest when they vote CPC for this one time coming up.
It will give the Liberanos a chance to move away from organized crime connections, elect a new, *Clean* leader, and regain some measure of respect.
It's not that there are no honest Liberals. It is simply a case of people who are earning the best income they ever had, along with expense accounts and bonuses
are naturally not going to stick their necks out for honesty and lose everything.
Good Whistle-Blower Protection law would change all that. Are you beginning to see how important Bill C-11 is? It takes a while before it becomes really clear. At least it did for me. 73s TG
= Warning ! =
Skype. Lets you talk instantly on the net for free.
That’s Great!…but get your own information on Skype
Do not accept or open Email RE: Skype.
Since October 16th… new Trojan
Details: http://My.Opera.com/T-G/
TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 18, 2005 03:34 PM (rmMzv)
2
Too bad they didn't have a picture of it, I'd like to see how big it is.
Still, if the thing has lasted 173 years . . .
Posted by: Jay at October 18, 2005 06:38 PM (PIbeE)
3
Not uncommon for older, smaller dams to be wood. Some dams are made of dirt, fer cryin' out loud! Just because the technology doesn't have shiny microchips in it doesn't mean it won't work. In fact most of the old stuff works when "the lights go out". Speaking of technology, it is being revealed to more people every day that the Libranos house is made of cards. Now if we can only find the one crucial card...
Posted by: DoubtingThomas at October 18, 2005 09:05 PM (YD54c)
4
It's hard to judge by what one sees on TV, but it appears to be massive.
True, messing with something that works is risky, but then I wonder how much press coverage this would have had if not for the flooding of New Orleans.
At least Taunton officials took the threat seriously and the inhabitants paid heed.
Posted by: Debbye at October 19, 2005 08:25 PM (Zr5g1)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 06, 2005
The media harsher on N.O. than the flood
Oct. 6 -
I accused the press of racism on Oct. 4 because they were too quick to believe that black Americans descended into barbarism after the levees in New Orleans broke and flooded large sections of the city. The damage caused by the wholesale failure to confirm information before rushing to press has been partially addressed in a lengthy article in yesterday's
Washington Post -
News of Pandemonium May Have Slowed Aid and evacuation efforts in New Orleans.
This is quite a comedown. The press was quite self-congratulatory when they believed their fearless reporting of widespread murders, rapes, child molestations and the wholesale looting of the entire gun department at Walmart sped aid to New Orleans and now they can contemplate the reality: that spreading these false rumours delayed rescue efforts and, worse, made other cities fear to welcome those in desperate need of refuge.
The press believed their own press. Who said irony was dead? (Come to think of it, it was the press!)
I'd like to cut writers Robert E. Pierre and Ann Gerhart some slack for at least addressing the failures of the news coverage in New Orleans during those terrible days but although the article starts well it ends with incredible stupidity:
Five weeks after Hurricane Katrina laid waste to New Orleans, some local, state and federal officials have come to believe that exaggerations of mayhem by officials and rumors repeated uncritically in the news media helped slow the response to the disaster and tarnish the image of many of its victims.
Claims of widespread looting, gunfire directed at helicopters and rescuers, homicides, and rapes, including those of "babies" at the Louisiana Superdome, frequently turned out to be overblown, if not completely untrue, officials now say.
[jumping to the concluding paragraph]
Keith M. Woods, faculty dean at the Poynter Institute for journalists, is willing to cut reporters some slack. "Every institutional source for quality information was uprooted," said Woods, a New Orleans native whose father's and sister's homes were flooded. "It was different than 9/11 because everything was underwater, and you are relying totally on word of mouth. In that situation, invariably, we will get some things wrong. One of the questions that would have served us better is 'How do you know that?'" (Bolding added)
Say what? Reporters
didn't know they should ask "How do you know that?" They slandered the residents of an entire city who were coping with a catastrophic flood with decency and dignity and why? because they abandoned basic journalistic standards. No fumbling excuses are allowed on this one.
Another feature of the article that could have been explored more thoroughly is this:
"Rumor control was a beast for us," said Maj. Ed Bush of the Louisiana National Guard, who was stationed at the Superdome. "People would hear something on the radio and come and say that people were getting raped in the bathroom or someone had been murdered. I would say, 'Ma'am, where?' I would tell them if there were bodies, my guys would find it. Everybody heard, nobody saw. Logic was out the window because the situation was illogical."
[...]
The Washington Post, in a Sept. 1 front-page article, noted that evacuees at the Superdome were repeating rumors of rapes and killings but quoted Maj. Bush as saying "none of that" occurred. A Sept. 15 front-page story said the precise number of people who died in the convention center was not known at the time, but officials believed it could be as many as 10. (Bolding added.)
Actually the number of bodies was 4. So why didn't they believe Major Bush or, at minimum, consider the truth of his assertions and pursue that angle? How can they give equal weight to statements uttered by an officer in the National Guard and statements made by persons who are reporting what they heard, not what they saw? Is it possible that his statements were discounted because the press is pre-conditioned to assume members of the military lie?
Lt. Gen. Russel L. Honore, commander of Joint Task Force Katrina, said that reporters got bogged down trying to tell people how bad the situation was rather than "gathering facts and corroborating that information."
He didn't say it this time but we know what he was thinking!
Another panicked rumour has been found to have a more likely explanation:
Federal agents arrested a man for shooting at a helicopter, on Sept. 5. But several officials, including Blanco, now believe that some of the gunfire people reported in the city was attempts to signal rescuers because residents have told them so.
Most people have been taught that three successive blasts on a whistle - or three shots, or three loud bangs - is a signal for help. In retrospect, it seems fairly likely that those who remembered that lesson applied it.
The article does do a credible job of addressing some of the rumours and dispensing of them and, under the sub-title "Setting the Record Straight," it permits one of those who remained rooted in reality, Major Bush, to do just that.
Maj. Bush of the Louisiana National Guard said he is glad the record is being corrected.
"I certainly saw fights, but I saw worse fights at a Cubs game in Chicago," he said. "The people never turned into these animals. They have been cheated out of being thought of as these tough people who looked out for each other. We had more babies born [in the Superdome] than we had deaths." (Bolding added)
And the issue I raised Tuesday still remains: why was the news media so quick to unquestioningly believe and spread lurid tales - which have since been disproven - that depicted New Orleans residents in the worst possible light? Was it because those residents were predominantly black?
(Via Neale News)
Posted by: Debbye at
08:09 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 968 words, total size 6 kb.
1
"... why was the news media so quick to unquestioningly believe and spread lurid tales..."
I've been hearing for over 40 years about the declining quality of education. If true, maybe it affects actual people.
Posted by: Stephen at October 06, 2005 01:38 PM (c7OtT)
2
Great shot, Stephen! So we are still trying to elevate journalists to "actual people" status! (Too bad they won't cooperate.)
Somehow, though, journalism seems to be drawing from the pool of America's Dumbest to fill their ranks. I just want to know what tests are administered and how badly one has to fail them to qualify as a reporter.
Somewhere, William Randolph Hearts is smiling.
Posted by: Debbye at October 07, 2005 07:08 PM (8k2BS)
3
I read an interview with the King of Jordan (I think it was). He was talking about the need to educate and test religious scholars before they become (mullahs or imams or whatever). From memory: "People attend university and if they fail to qualify for what they're trying for, they become Imams or journalists - and we know how well that works out".
The NYT should build it's own Statue of Liberty with a plaque that reads "Give us your rock-stupid . . ."
Posted by: Jay at October 08, 2005 05:31 PM (PIbeE)
4
The media always plays up things to catch peoples attention. Unfortunately the don't thing of the consequences.
Posted by: Em at October 12, 2005 10:39 PM (z3VVW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 05, 2005
FEMA leads to disaster!
Oct. 5 -
Larry shows how power point presentations lead to so much audience inattention that they uncritically view one that seemingly shows that
FEMA leads to disaster.
I'm not sure how I would redo this, but I think that metaphorically speaking, prevention and preparedness shouldn't lead to disaster.
Ouch.
Posted by: Debbye at
08:02 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 56 words, total size 1 kb.
October 04, 2005
Katrina - mythical and factual racism
Oct. 4 - The New Orleans death toll from the levee breaches and Hurricane Katrina
is now at 964 972 Dead and body searches have ended. Mississippi lost 221 souls during the hurricane.
This is far short of the 10,000 feared dead in New Orleans but there is no reason to celebrate.
The looting (and I'm not talking about foraging for food and water) was unsurprising. The indications that some New Orleans policemen deserted and others were looters was surprising.
But the biggest - and most shameful - surprise was how readily the news media believed the horror stories of rape, murder and child molestation within the Super Dome and on the streets. I'm not the only blogger who was skeptical about the stories and didn't repeat them so I'm not bragging but the question remains: what do ordinary Americans have that the news media doesn't?
The answer is common sense - and maybe something else.
The stories were not believed by many of us because they were literally unbelievable. We know ourselves and we know that a dire situation as Katrina tends to unite us even if only the interests of survival. Thank back on the footage we actually saw. Groups of people previously unknown to one another were trapped together on overpasses as well as in the Convention Center and Super Dome and they did as people in such circumstances have always done: stayed together and helped one another until they were rescued.
Look, accusations of racism have been flung about too wildly in the aftermath of Katrina so I'm hesitant to say this, but I can't help believing that racism played a role in the willingness of the news media to believe that black Americans descended into lawlessness and barbarism - there was even an account of cannibalism, for crying out loud - and they should be called on it.
Yet which of those who broadcast these stories as fact has had the guts to wonder why they were so gullible?
It wasn't the black faces in the flooded streets of New Orleans that gave evidence of racism in America but the willing promulgation of lies and sensationalist stories by the news media. Shame on them. They owe all of us an apology.
Posted by: Debbye at
09:32 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 388 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Well stated Debbye. The media also missed or ignored stories such as the 14 year old youth (black also) who managed to start an abandoned school bus and drove around the neighbourhood picking up people and then heading for safety. I guess those kind of stories don't sell papers or raise ratings.
Posted by: John B at October 04, 2005 10:53 AM (ju7Wp)
2
This is all very well written and interesting as is John B's Story about the 14 year old driving people to safety.
I have been enjoying some of the exchanges between actual residents of the Katrina and Rita affected areas on ProteinWisdom.
Some interesting views about keeping one's security safe at home and on the net are worth consideration: http://My.Opera.com/T-G/
Photography too. Good site? 73s TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 04, 2005 12:28 PM (rmMzv)
3
John, you hit that nail. There was also an account of a woman who gave birth while stranded on one of the overpasses and a pocket knife was sterilized with a lighter to cut the umbilical cord. Or the five-year old who led younger children to safety after being separated from their parents. These incidents were reported - briefly - on air but reporters focused on the false horror stories.
The media chose imaginary horror and savagery over heroism. Their worldview is not mine.
Tony, I haven't read ProteinWisdom lately (too many scandals in Canada!) Thanks for a the nudge - I really do need to get out more.
Posted by: Debbye at October 04, 2005 02:16 PM (GL6JY)
4
Nice post and I could not believe whinning about every ill in the world would lower the water levels either.
Posted by: Dex at October 04, 2005 02:36 PM (kO17P)
5
I cannot help but wonder if there would be calls for investigations into the federal response without the context of murder, rape and piles of corpses in the Superdome and the Convention Center. So much of the criticism was predicted on the horrible stories coming out of NOLA.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at October 06, 2005 10:09 PM (ics4u)
6
Stephen, I hadn't considered that aspect but I think you are right. That means that the Congress too was willing to believe the worst.
The media should apologize. They should grovel. They should get on their knees and beg the forgiveness of those they slandered and those they gulled.
But they won't.
Posted by: Debbye at October 07, 2005 07:17 PM (8k2BS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 03, 2005
Predator joins border patrol
Oct. 3 - Murdoc reports there are
Predators on the line (I'm soft on
those predators.)
Posted by: Debbye at
06:46 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Good idea, but they need to arm the things. I don;t especially want to kill Mexicans but if it made them stay on their side of the border . . .
Posted by: Jay at October 03, 2005 08:03 PM (PIbeE)
2
Ha! I should have thought to email you about this.
I usually try to remember you whenenver the Predator makes the news...
Posted by: Murdoc at October 03, 2005 09:23 PM (9HotR)
3
Over ten years ago, I had a rigid meeting with a US Federal Marshall at the Blaine Border crossing between BC and Washington State.
A customs agent gave me permission to sell graphics products in Bellingham. That tuned out to be an error on his part. Somebody phoned me in to the feds and I was sitting in a computer equipped police cruiser.
This guy in the dark green uniform was one junkyard dog. After fingerprinting I suggested we go back and see the agent I spoke with.
We went to the border crossing and the guy was off shift. Oh no. Junkyard assured me I was going to spend some days in the lock-up.
We did some more talking and I assured him there would never be another incident, so he let me get back to Canada with a warning.
If the guys in dark green were that mean then, I would hate to be in their clutches in today's post 9/11 mood. ugh. 73s TG
Posted by: TonyGuitar at October 04, 2005 12:46 PM (rmMzv)
4
Tony, Don't feel badly. Even I have had my problems at the border, but the surprise is the larger number of times they just waved me through. My kids swear my accent gives me away as an American (I still can't say roof to Canadian standards.)
Jay, you already know that arming a Predator over U.S. soil would be illegal but I sure get your drift!
Murdoc, I was going to claim that you didn't need to notify because I already got my coded communique from Karl Rove but I was afraid some idiot would actually believe it.
I simply adore the Predator - especially when it's accessorized with Hellfire missles - because its existence lets us sleep better knowing that the enemy can't. (And besides, it drives the loonier liberals nuts.)
Posted by: Debbye at October 04, 2005 01:37 PM (GL6JY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Airman 1st Class Elizabeth Jacobson
Oct. 3 - As women we demand equal rights and accept that, with those rights, come responsibilities. One young woman who accepted those responsibilities was Airman 1st Class Elizabeth Jacobson, and on Sept. 28 she became the Air Force's first female casualty in Iraq.
The Cult of the Victim is one side of feminism but I prefer the side that women like Airman Jacobson represent. They let their deeds - not their grievances - speak.
Godspeed though that wild blue yonder, Airman Jacobson. And thank you.
Her story is here and a more personal account is here.
Posted by: Debbye at
08:15 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 107 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hi my name is Hayley and Elizabeth Jacobson was my cousin. I really didn't get to know her as well as i hoped. I miss her very much but we know that she died doing what she loved and died proudly for her country. I am going to miss her dearly and she will never be forgotten.
IN LOVING MEMORY
ELIZABETH JACOBSON
AIRMAN 1ST CLASS
U.S. AIR FORCE
MAY SHE NEVER BE FORGOTTEN AND REST IN PEACE!
Posted by: Hayley at October 10, 2005 09:09 PM (GT/RJ)
2
She will never be forgotten, Hayley. She lives on in those she has inspired. (I know that those are poor words for so immense a loss, but there really are no words that suffice.)
My sincere condolences to you and your family. And I do believe she rests in peace because she has the knowledge that she performed her chosen duty and fulfilled her pledge.
We will continue to do our part over here, and we will do it in her name.
Posted by: Debbye at October 16, 2005 01:48 AM (6Sttv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
67kb generated in CPU 0.0221, elapsed 0.074 seconds.
69 queries taking 0.0589 seconds, 197 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.