March 31, 2004
Double-take
Mar. 31 -
Schwarzenegger takes sexual harassment course.
Now men need to take courses to learn how to be sexually harassing?
Posted by: Debbye at
11:37 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 23 words, total size 1 kb.
1
No, it's a course on how politicians do it, rather than actors.
Posted by: Simon at April 01, 2004 01:29 AM (GWTmv)
2
It's not so much much "how to", as "how to get away with it" which is very critical for politicians.
Posted by: Fred at April 01, 2004 08:18 AM (SPn8I)
3
LOL. Ah,
now I understand. I was really worried there.
Posted by: Debbye at April 01, 2004 08:45 AM (GcT8+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 30, 2004
A Failure Policy that Succeeds
Mar. 30 - Good op-ed piece by educator Marlene Heath in the
NY Times about the success of holding students back until they have achieved the aims of each grade (you know, like being able to read) and how holding them back to get the basics allows them to succeed as they continue their education. (
A Failure Policy That Succeeds.)
more...
Posted by: Debbye at
03:22 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 557 words, total size 3 kb.
1
What puzzles me is why she and the other teachers were so skeptical of the idea in the first place. ``Self-esteem'' problems if they weren't promoted? What about the ``self-esteem'' of someone graduating high school who can barely write her own name?
Of course, if they push 'em on through like that, then they don't have to waste their time actually, you know, *teaching* the kids. (What a drag that must have been - all that drilling, all that repetition.) Better to just pass them on; then they're not your problem anymore.
Anyway, I'm glad this gal finally came around. I hope she's not the only one.
Posted by: Anne at March 30, 2004 05:13 PM (H2cuL)
Posted by: Debbye at April 01, 2004 12:22 AM (u0hyb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Home of the Green Baron
Mar. 30 - A welcome new addition to the
They Who Serve blogroll: Thomas,
Home of the Green Baron, is posted in Korea.
Thomas tells a bit about himself and please note his Canadian Connection and cat named Attila!
Posted by: Debbye at
03:04 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thanks for adding me. I plan to enjoy the blogosphere
BTW, I'l be flying into Toronto enroute to Corner Brook.
Posted by: Green Baron at March 30, 2004 06:28 PM (dRpZT)
2
Wonderful! Let me know when.
Posted by: Debbye at March 30, 2004 09:34 PM (yQTW5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 29, 2004
When Mountain Lions Attack
Mar. 29 -
Murdoc tells us
How to escape from a mountain lion.
He's also got the latest on military vehicle equipment and he is talking ammunition with Airborne Combat Engineer.
Posted by: Debbye at
08:37 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 39 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Please forgive me for quoting myself: "Gunfire or more advanced weaponry may be more appropriate, depending on the sort of animal you are confronted with."
There are all sorts of dangerous animals out there, and you should use the appropriate measures to deal with them.
Rabid squirrels? A stick ought to do.
Wild dog? A handgun should be sufficient.
Mountain lion? A rifle will do the trick.
Maniacal savage leader of terrorist network? Let me tell you about a little friend we like to call "Hellfire".
Thanks for the link!
Posted by: murdoc at March 29, 2004 09:28 PM (A1tSt)
2
Murdoc, I love following you and ACE back and forth on the weapons talk even if I lack the understand Paul has on the subject.
Unfortunately, my weaponry skills are limited to archery and sports guns but Hey! you worked in a reference to the Hellfire again!
Did you notice they spent a lot of time talking about the armed Predator during the Sept. 11 Commission hearings?
Both State and Defense are so obviously reading us to keep their fingers on the nation's pulse.
Posted by: Debbye at March 30, 2004 12:43 PM (yQTW5)
3
I figured you'd like the Hellfire reference. It occurred to me as I wrote that post that there are all sorts of dangerous animals out there, and that the same tactics usually apply whether they're four-legged or two-legged threats.
And we're all just a bunch of bloggers with opinions and a little too much time on our hands, but it State and Defense DID keep up with us, I've got to think they'd maybe see some things a bit more clearly than they seem to sometimes.
Posted by: murdoc at March 30, 2004 05:04 PM (rMHj5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
American Girl With Pride
Mar. 29 - America, stand up and salute 14-year old
Laura Elfman, the young American student living in Canada
who was booed while carrying her country's flag in Montreal last week.
Some of us were pretty het up about that incident, but there was probably another feeling inside, one we didn't talk about, and Laura did exactly what we knew she'd do once we realized this was the second year this had happened to her yet she was carrying Old Glory again.
"Try it again, because you will feel better. It makes you feel strong," she said.
[...]
Laura, who doesn't follow politics, acknowledged that last year she ran off the stage in tears.
But contrary to news reports, this year: "I stood up for myself" and in no way left the stage crying, she said.
"I said, 'Hi, my name is Laura,' and when people were booing, I was talking over them (into the microphone), and I said, 'and I'm very, very proud to be holding the United States of America flag.' "
She said only a few students booed.
more...
Posted by: Debbye at
06:02 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 400 words, total size 3 kb.
1
What gets me is that this is the second year in a row that the school pulled this stunt - they knew she got booed last year, but went ahead and held the same program and (as far as I can tell) didn't try to enforce any behavior standards among the students. This being Canada, I wonder if some of the teachers weren't rather enjoying the booing as well.
Brava Laura - I'm glad she has guts. And I'm glad to hear she's returning Stateside for school next year. Life is tough enough at that age without having to put up with school-sanctioned bullying as well.
Posted by: Anne at March 29, 2004 07:03 PM (H2cuL)
2
Anne, I know it hurts that kids like Laura have to contend with idiots just because she honours and loves her country, but that is the way it is outside of the USA and it's a fight we must press.
Knowing how the schools think up here, they probably encouraged Laura not to participate because they were worried about "her self-esteem."
They really and truly don't understand that taking that easy path would have hurt her far more.
Remember when the President said back in Sept., 2001, that we would inspire others by our courage?
That's one of the ways we'll win this thing, and hot damn! I think Laura has scored one for the USA.
I'm also an incurably sentimental romantic!
Posted by: Debbye at March 29, 2004 09:55 PM (cowNW)
3
I think this is a great story too, because Laura recognized that the outburst of a few doesn't represent the majority. Still, it would have been nice for someone to show a little authority, which doesn't mean taking away a person's right to protest, but it should remove the mask of anonimity that coward gain false courage from.
Hold that flag high my dear; you are a worthy standard bearer.
Posted by: John H at March 30, 2004 01:02 AM (XNPTM)
4
Good story. But the issue is really about our attitude toward the United States, not Laura's courage.
Let's say the country had been one we don't admire, like North Korea. What would you have thought of the girl who continued to stand up and be counted when booed. You probably would have considered her a dupe and only secretly admired her courage. Look what happened when Bill Maher said the 911 killers weren't cowards.
Posted by: Canadian Headhunter at March 30, 2004 08:19 AM (10VJV)
5
Michael, you are right to point out that there are definitely aspects to this story that does Canadians proud.
John sees the most important fact: the booers represented the opinions of a few and Laura didn't let the few blind her to the many.
And this article
reaffirms the basic decency of most Canadians. Seriously, who cares what the school bureaucracy did or not do
compared to how her classmates and Canadians across the country responded?
As for North Korea, again I look at it as an American. NK is a stated enemy of the US and has issued threats against us and armed our enemies, but we're not at open war with them and are nominally engaged with talks with them.
My thoughts on seeing an NK flag would be grim, maybe because I know the outcome if NK initiates an attack upon us.
I have no way of knowing how Canadians would respond to the North Korean flag, though. That's an interesting line of thought.
Posted by: Debbye at March 30, 2004 02:16 PM (yQTW5)
6
I doubt one Canadian in a hundred could recognize the flag of North Korea, let alone describe the continuing atrocities of that regime. No, the only "other" that matters to Canadians is the United States. This story says much more about the parochialism and ignorance of Canada than it does about anything else (though I am delighted this young woman had the character to face the ingrates for a second year running).
Posted by: Ghost of a flea at March 30, 2004 04:08 PM (3+LTh)
7
Ghost, my point was that if she was standing up for a country we hate we would not admire her no matter how courageous she was. It had to be a commitment to something we consider decent and important. The tendency I think would be to imagine that we are admiring her courage when in fact it is more than that. I remember many years ago having to admit to myself, grudgingly, that Khomeini had guts to stand up to the United States but that didn't stop me from hating him because of what he himself stood for.
Posted by: Canadian Headhunter at March 30, 2004 04:20 PM (10VJV)
8
This was a highly symbollic act of intolerance. Just one more pinpoint of hate on a little American girl. Yet Canada's lackadaisical response to these acts of "excepted/ accepted" intolerance presage the gathering storm which gathers below the border. Are you prepared to get back what you have given? Is that what Canada wants? Is Canada such a bitter eunuch that it will tolerate this in order to get a little attention? Take to the streets, burn American flags and have a proper riot of it - but don't stoop so low as to pour your venom out on a child.
Posted by: Pescado at March 30, 2004 11:32 PM (SfJBA)
9
Settle down, Pescado, I know it's a touchy issue but Laura handled it, and the booers were the ones isolated, not her.
The act wasn't accepted by anyone with sense and decency (including the school officials.)
Posted by: Debbye at April 01, 2004 12:31 AM (u0hyb)
10
Laura was in my care for 18 months so I speak with some authority on the issue. Politicize Laura's actions, and the reactions of the crowd in anyway you wish, but her intentions were never political. The real beauty of this story is the courage of conviction, the strong sense of self that this child has forged for herself despite the difficulties of her childhood. She has matured into a magnificent young lady, one I am blessed to have known.
Posted by: janet at April 11, 2004 01:36 PM (rZmE1)
11
Well said, Janet.
"Try it again, because you will feel better. It makes you feel strong," she said.
That is the key quote and a principle we all try to teach our children. It was Laura's courage and pride that was noted and applauded.
I didn't want to go too overboard in the original post, but you and I know that her character is stronger for this and that she will face her life with courage.
That is the best possible outcome of any ordeal and what we pray for when we see our kids go through pain and make their decisions.
Posted by: Debbye at April 11, 2004 05:17 PM (Y0TzN)
12
This is the girl that got booed any comments send me an email
Posted by: laura elfman at June 10, 2004 05:42 PM (r2f2Z)
13
This is completely insane! First off all, I go to Wagar, and believe me that is not the story. Laura Elfman has a bad reputation at our school, she's had sex, a million boyfriends, ruins relationships etc. When she went up onto that stage, yes people were booing. This might sound crazy but, people were booing her. It just so happens that people see the negative side of it. The gazette doesn't know why the school booed, were they there? The girl just wants free stuff and to be out in the public. If you see someone run away from someone and cry you immediately think they were bullied or scammed, but think about it....are you so sure about that? This multicultural day was out a doubt a big blow on her.
Posted by: Anonymous at October 07, 2004 06:41 PM (4h1Il)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 25, 2004
Sept. 11 Commission Hearings
Mar. 25 - There are a number of links to note:
The most important is the website for the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. The archives for prior hearings and commission findings are here; the latest full transcripts are from January, 2004, and the ones from March should soon be available.
However, the agenda, witness list and prepared statements from this week's session are available here (the statements are in .pdf format.)
more...
Posted by: Debbye at
12:14 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 526 words, total size 4 kb.
March 24, 2004
Pvt. Dwayne Turner
Mar. 24 - I had never heard of Pvt. Dwayne Turner until I read
this. Now I don't think I'll ever forget him.
Honour those who serve.
Posted by: Debbye at
11:17 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Wow, touching story - bravery comes in all shapes and sizes.
Posted by: Nik at March 25, 2004 10:16 AM (Kuk8N)
2
This is Dwayne lil bro, and i want to tell him that i love him and im so proud of u. love u Tony
Posted by: David Turner at June 10, 2004 04:00 PM (/0nzV)
3
David, be sure and let your brother know that his deeds have inspired people around the world, and I hope you have a chance to tell him that in person soon.
The troops have done an incredible job in Iraq, and words like "a grateful nation" doesn't even begin to describe our debt to them.
Posted by: Debbye at June 11, 2004 07:43 AM (Z73qy)
4
I am very proud of my son, however he started fighting a new war. My son was diagnosed with PTSD and was not given any of his military benefits when discharged. Doc is now fighting for his benefits. Please were recruiting please join the fight. Keep all the troops in your prays.
Please don't hesitate to call me for any support or if you are going through the same thing.
(317)574-1853
Posted by: Barbara Turner (Dwaynes mother) at July 22, 2004 08:10 PM (ywi9O)
5
Tony, I like to brag and tell people that you are a soldier beacuse I came home from boot camp in my dress blues after Marine Corp boot camp. That is my fantasy. You are the real deal. You are truly my hero. Many years after the military is behind you, you will come to realize that ultimately are the captain of your own fate and master of your soul. When the Army becomes a distant memory, much in the same way as the Marines have become for me, make sure you can garner the strength and the positiveness out of your experience. The Army was a start. Now you can go out there and grab the bull by the balls. I'll be there when you get that PHd.
Much Love, Much Respect,
Your Uncle Jody
Posted by: Joseph Smith at January 12, 2005 10:25 AM (7jIb0)
6
Tony, I like to brag and tell people that you are a soldier beacuse I came home from boot camp in my dress blues after Marine Corp boot camp. That is my fantasy. You are the real deal. You are truly my hero. Many years after the military is behind you, you will come to realize that ultimately you are the captain of your own fate and master of your soul. When the Army becomes a distant memory, much in the same way as the Marines have become for me, make sure you can garner the strength and the positiveness out of your experience. The Army was a start. Now you can go out there and grab the bull by the balls. I'll be there when you get that PHd.
Much Love, Much Respect,
Your Uncle Jody
Posted by: Joseph Smith at January 12, 2005 10:42 AM (7jIb0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 23, 2004
Sept. 11 hearings
Mar. 23 - I've been watching the
hearings of the independent commission of Sept. 11 on CNN, and it is frustrating. Did the administration under FDR have to face a similar inquiry about lapses of failure after Pearl Habour? (That is strictly a rhetorical question, okay?)
There is so astounding a lack of common sense and humility in these proceedings that it begs the questions Are you more interested in winning this war or this election? In what way does what did or did not happen before Sept. 11 actually pertain to the post-Sept. 11 period?
more...
Posted by: Debbye at
01:40 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 570 words, total size 4 kb.
1
I happened to watch today as well...and you hit the nail on the head. We could sit all day and debate "would have, should have". Especially when Clinton had the offering of Bin Laden on a platter. But really would the support have been there to use shock and awe...not a chance. This whole exercise should really boil down to what logical thinkers now know and many knew previously. Inaction equals death. Victory creates peace, and diplomacy keeps the peace.
Posted by: Spin Killer at March 23, 2004 02:31 PM (q81Xa)
2
All excellent comments.
Posted by: annika at March 23, 2004 03:14 PM (zAOEU)
3
I know it was a rhetorical question…but the answer is ‘YES’. The attack on Pearl Harbor was investigated multiple times…the first investigations took place in the weeks immediately following the attack. They ended with a 25,000 page report issues in 1946.
The first reports lay the blame on the Army and Navy commanders at Pearl HarborÂ…Admiral Kimmel and General Short, IIRR. Later investigations looked at a wider range of factors and pointed out other contributing problems.
So the blame game is not newÂ…but the political climate is far more vicious now than it was then...and 'Blame America First' was not a popular attitude within either political party back then....
Posted by: Maggie at March 23, 2004 06:06 PM (s6c4t)
4
Two things jumped out at me. First was the various headlines throughout the day, first blaming President Bush, then President Clinton, then faulty intelligence, then... and so on and so on.
Second was that nobody got what they really wanted out of this - a political scapegoat. Blame was spread far and wide, and nobody escaped having the finger pointed at them at least a little.
All in all, I'm satisfied. It's a complex question, and the answer, such as it is, shouldn't be reduced to "he did it" or "he didn't do it".
Posted by: Ted at March 23, 2004 07:42 PM (ZjSa7)
5
A good post.
Personally, as much as I despise Clinton, I don't blame him for not foreseeing 9/11. Neither do I blame Bush. Before 9/11, I never could have conceived hijacking commercial passenger aircraft for suicide missions. Even now it still sounds vaguely tinfoil hat. But it happened, and everything changed because of it.
9/11 probably couldn't have been prevented. But now that we understand the depth and breadth of the enemy's insanity, perhaps the next one can.
Posted by: Harvey at March 24, 2004 01:34 AM (ubhj8)
6
Once again, the blogosphere has considerably more wisdom than the commission and at least 3 times that of the media!
Spinkiller, Ted and Harvey: good points about what looking at what "logical thinkers" knew and now know and how our present readiness is more important.
Thanks Annika! Too bad there isn't some kind of common sense litmus test we can give our lawmakers.
Maggie, another history buff! Hurrah! I know there were hearings, but what I wanted was to side-step were the cover-up theories that have emerged in the past 30 years:
FDR knew / he thought they would hit the Phillipines / there were three equally potential targets and so on which were based on little actual evidence save that of 20/20 hindsight.
Funny how the media seems to think the commission has already reached their findings based on the questions that were asked. They are rapidly raising their own Moron Factor.
Posted by: Debbye at March 24, 2004 07:48 AM (XW+Je)
7
Great post. Agreed 100%.
I think these investigations MUST be made and we can learn a lot of valuable lessons from what they uncover, but the finger pointing is, um, pointless.
There is clearly a search for a scapegoat. Is the media hyping it? I'm not quite sure what's going on, but it isn't constructive.
Posted by: murdoc at March 24, 2004 01:05 PM (2w8l6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Dr. King Under God
Mar. 23 - Op-ed in the
NY Times today about the Pledge of Allegiance case which will be argued before the Supreme Court tomorrow
One Nation, Enriched by Biblical Wisdom. Using the book "A Stone of Hope" by David L. Chappell, Brooks explores the religious nature inherent in that movement as embodied by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and draws an interesting conclusion:
Chappell argues that the civil rights movement was not a political movement with a religious element. It was a religious movement with a political element.
more...
Posted by: Debbye at
08:52 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 603 words, total size 4 kb.
1
I was moved by your thoughts about Dr. King, a man against identity politics and for human rights. I was struck especially by the role of judgment and the contents of our character. I have been talking to people about it ever since.
Posted by: Ghost of a flea at March 23, 2004 09:56 AM (3+LTh)
2
Wow, thank you, Nicholas. It's gratifying to find one's thoughts and views affecting a person as reflective as yourself.
Maybe identity politics is one of the steps we have to go through as we advance, one inch at a time, to the point when humanity is capable of regarding each person as a distinct individual.
Posted by: Debbye at March 23, 2004 02:01 PM (QcWV/)
3
how can people who lack a spiritual nature nourished by God truly comprehend the murderous nature of those who believe they are the divine instruments of Allah? How can people who have no beliefs understand that there are fanatics who are consumed by their beliefs?
Errr, well, I don't want to be a stickler, but I'm an agnostic and I don't have any problems understanding the murderous nature of islamofascists...
Posted by: Burnside at March 23, 2004 03:22 PM (rXrx+)
4
Heh, Burnside. I know there are some exceptional people like you!
Somehow, though, I don't think you regard
human beings as soulless utility-maximizers, or as members of this or that demographic group or class.
Posted by: Debbye at March 23, 2004 04:59 PM (QcWV/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 22, 2004
James Lileks
Mar. 22 - Lileks is
angry today and when when he rolls, it's all to the good.
BUT the guy with the sign isn't (strictly speaking) a traitor. He's a lot of things including an idiot, a maroon, a 33rd degree moonbat, and a few more things but there are real traitors in the US and I don't want that word diluted to include the oh-so-very-clever nut fringe less we forget those who have actively collaborated with our enemies to destroy us.
UPDATE Mar. 23 - 01:07: Robert over at ExPat Yank argues for the need for a third term which can define someone like the nut in the photo.
Murdoc points that this sign is treasonous (and for the record, troops to Vietnam were deployed by air, not by sea.)
Posted by: Debbye at
10:46 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 135 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I was glad to see that the Iraqi bloggers felt free to comment on the demonstrations. Very touching piece on Iraq the Model.
Posted by: Sammie at March 22, 2004 11:30 AM (f9BC9)
2
I agree that the guy with the sign isn't a traitor. Although I'm quite happy to call those sorts all kinds of unpleasant names, traitor isn't one of them.
It's funny, though, that when someone who is voicing their opinion is criticized (or even called "unpatriotic" of all things) they claim that their freedom of speech is being threatened by someone else's, um, freedom of speech.
Or maybe it's not so funny.
Posted by: murdoc at March 22, 2004 12:18 PM (rMHj5)
3
Thanks for the nudge, Sammie, I've fallen a bit behind reading the Iraq blogs. Might have done some people a lot of good to read them and try to answer their questions.
Murdoc, you're right and on target. And it is funny in the funny-sad kind of way. Or sad-funny.
Posted by: Debbye at March 22, 2004 11:15 PM (nQ5CB)
Posted by: murdoc at March 22, 2004 11:22 PM (A1tSt)
5
Isn't that sign illegal in that it advocates an illegal act?
Loved the commenters, especially the one who pointed out that the troops were deployed by air, not sea.
I'd say it advocated treason. ExPat Yank (see update) suggests coming up with a third term for those who aren't traitors but who advocate actions and views that are awfully close.
Posted by: Debbye at March 23, 2004 01:24 AM (nQ5CB)
6
The sign rejoicing at the destruction of the world trade centre, and by extension, at the massacre of civilians, leaves me wondering at how tolerant a society can be before it disintegrates. An interesting piece at the top of Mark Steyn's page today on that theme too, i.e. tolerance as weakness. Tolerant we must remain, but how much so? Congratulations to any cops (or for that matter, anyone at all) that witnessed that sign and didn't bash the guy's brains out, for their incredible self restraint.
Posted by: keith at March 23, 2004 08:58 AM (xfdnu)
7
"Advocated Treason". I like it. I like it.
Yes, now that my outrage has cleared (a bit) I agree that there needs to be something for that sort of behavior. ExPat Yank is on the $$$, as usual.
Free speech, and all, but what if I made a sign condemning people who protest the government or who suggest that our soldiers should commit treason? I'd be labeled unpatriotic and hateful by many people. And if I condemned THEM, they'd cry about being oppressed.
You can't yell "FIRE!" in a crowded theater because of the harm it might cause others. I say that a lot of this type of thing is close to that sort of thing.
Posted by: murdoc at March 23, 2004 09:46 AM (2w8l6)
8
Help, Keith, I checked Steyn's page but can't find what you're referring to!
Murdoc - Yep, ExPat Yank doesn't pull his punches. We do need some way to differentiate those who offer a useful criticsm of policy and the destructive nuts.
Posted by: Debbye at March 23, 2004 02:18 PM (QcWV/)
9
The piece I referred to by steyn is linked through his page under the title Neville again, and it can be found at:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml;?xml=/opinion/2004/03/23/do2302.xml
Its in the Telegraph. Hope you find it, the introductory paragraphs about the mom who lets her son play with a toy plastic shield but not the toy plastic sword are right on.
Posted by: keith at March 24, 2004 09:41 AM (xfdnu)
10
p.s. if you read the steyn article (previous posting) you will see that it is not directly on the topic of people carrying wacked out signs at wacko demonstrations. But it deals with the apparent inability of so many in the west to recognize that there are many amongst us who flat out actually want to harm us, and many more who sympathize with, and are willing to aid and abet them, hence the link to the zombies at the protests in NY. Tolerance, yes. But if we don't recognize the gravity of the situation, our own tolerance may eventually lead to a lot less tolerance. Hijab anyone? See also the amazing Khadr family. I keep wondering to myself, is it normal that we allow people to immigrate to the west and then stay in the west, when they flat out admit, nay, brag about the fact that they fully support those who would bring about a brand new dark ages? I don't care one iota where someone comes from or what their skin colour may be; I don't want to have people who despise everthing about our society living here on welfare and "spitting in the soup" (translated directly from the french).
Posted by: keith at March 24, 2004 09:52 AM (xfdnu)
11
Ah, thanks Keith. I did read the "Neville" entry yesterday but obviously not closely enough. Good point linking the sword/shield story with questions as to how tolerant we can be until we self-destruct.
Canada tried a fairly revolutionary approach to immigration, and some of it is coming back to haunt them. Yet there are true refugees, and that Canada chooses to aid them is a good value.
Diversity and unity should be able to find some common meeting ground - both here and in the US.
Posted by: Debbye at March 24, 2004 11:46 AM (XW+Je)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 03, 2004
California Proposition Results
Mar. 3 - 3
California voters OK Schwarzenegger's budget rescue approving Propositions 57 and 58 and defeating Propositions 55 and 56.
Proposition 56 proposed that budgets be passed by a 55% majority in the legislature and was an attempt to water down the state law (enacted by earlier passage of Proposition 13) which requires that budgets be passed by a 2/3 majority. It was defeated with 64% of the voters voting against the measure.
Proposition 55 was a school bonds bill and, according to CNN, was trailing with 48% approval.
more...
Posted by: Debbye at
09:39 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 153 words, total size 1 kb.
March 02, 2004
The Secessionists of Vermont
Mar. 2 - The people have spoken:
Killington residents vote to secede from Vermont:
Town officials said about two-thirds of the 200 to 300 people who attended the town meeting supported secession.
Yes, Virginia, there are still places where town meetings are held to vote on matters of concern to the town's citizens.
There were some other places voting today but I'm holding out until I hear the results from California (no, not the Dem primaries, the propositions!)
Posted by: Debbye at
09:52 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 84 words, total size 1 kb.
Quick Hits
Mar. 2 -
Canada assailed for failing to step in and save Aristide. Indeed. Who might fall next if Canada doesn't take a firmer line and flex soft diplomatic muscles for all they're worth - Mugabe? Chavez? the Iranian Council of Guardians? Shame! Blame
France Canada? No, because PM Martin thinks that the rebels should
consider sharing power with Aristide (because that has worked so well in Ivory Coast?)
Blacks angered by gays' metaphors:
"We find the gay community's attempt to tie their pursuit of special rights based on their behavior to the civil rights movement of the 1960s and 1970s abhorrent," Bishop Andrew Merritt of Straight Gate Ministries and several other Detroit pastors said recently in a statement supporting traditional marriage. "Being black is not a lifestyle choice."
more...
Posted by: Debbye at
12:29 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 328 words, total size 3 kb.
First Amendment Rights
Mar. 2 - This is disturbing:
Catholic Group Is Told to Pay for Birth Control by the California State Supreme Court.
The ruling has sweeping implications for religion-based nonprofit organizations and hospitals throughout the state and could influence decisions made in at least 20 other states that have similar laws requiring employers to provide contraception as part of employee health coverage, legal experts said. A similar case, brought by Catholic and Protestant organizations, is winding its way through the New York courts.
more...
Posted by: Debbye at
10:17 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 721 words, total size 5 kb.
Education in the USA
Mar. 2 - Why I still take the
NY Times seriously: this editorial which supports the No Child Left Behind program (
Rescuing Education Reform) and, although taking some sideways shots at the Bush administration, calls upon Democrats to recognize that the positions taken by the NEA (National Education Association) are not supportable:
Democratic legislators are also fearful of the National Education Association, the country's largest and most powerful teachers' union. The union has a history of vigorously resisting standards-based change and is dead set against making teachers subject to federally dictated qualification and performance standards. While Mr. Paige made an egregious error in referring to the union as a "terrorist organization," the N.E.A. has not served the cause of quality education well in this fight, particularly when it attempts to turn suburban parents against the new law.
Instead of pandering to the law's opponents, whoever wins the Democratic nomination needs to seize what may be the country's last opportunity to achieve basic fairness in public education. That means standing up to wavering Democrats who are eager for a chance to jump ship.
If this keeps up, I'll have to stop referring to the
Toronto Star as NY Times-lite so as not to unfairly insult the Times.
Posted by: Debbye at
09:02 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 212 words, total size 1 kb.
March 01, 2004
Rumsfeld's War
Mar. 1 -
First and
second in a series of excerpts in
Rumsfeld's War, a book about US Sec. of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, courtesy of the
Washington Times.
more...
Posted by: Debbye at
12:10 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 99 words, total size 1 kb.
65kb generated in CPU 0.0231, elapsed 0.0861 seconds.
70 queries taking 0.0709 seconds, 219 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.