March 31, 2005
From euthanasia to ... where?
Mar. 31 - While Americans struggle with hearts and minds over the many issues that have been brought to the fore during her parents' fight to save their daughter, Terri Schiavo, the Dutch are now contemplating what should be done when doctors decide it's best to
kill infants, the mentally handicapped or the demented. From
AP:
THE DUTCH government, first to legalize euthanasia for terminally ill people, will tackle an even thornier ethical dilemma: What to do when doctors say it's best to end the lives of infants, the mentally handicapped or the demented. The Royal Dutch Medical Association says guidelines and a panel of experts should be created to vet such cases. Doctors acting with the families' permission would not be punished for administering lethal sedatives to "people with no free will" in cases that pass review.
Under current law, euthanasia is restricted to terminal patients suffering unbearable pain with no hope of improvement and who, when they are still of sound mind, request to die.
I began this post over 45 minutes ago and I'm still groping for words. This has just got to be some kind of twisted joke. Real people, the kind who can walk upright and string words together to form coherent sentences, could not be contemplating such barbarity.
Posted by: Debbye at
08:46 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 222 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Damn Dutch.
Just as bad as the Belgians.
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 31, 2005 10:42 AM (t+KkC)
2
The Dutch initially countered the resultant publicity by falsely stating that it is only done with the family's permission. But Dutch officials later admitted that, in fact, a doctor can overrule a family's decision when the family does not reach the right conclusion due to emotional involvement.
It appears that the Dutch have learned little from their shameful collaboration with the Nazis.
Posted by: mikem at March 31, 2005 07:09 PM (EzNXf)
3
There's no one else on this website but me and this tool, right?
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 31, 2005 08:32 PM (t+KkC)
4
"in fact, a doctor can overrule a family's decision when the family does not reach the right conclusion due to emotional involvement"
Translation: If they disagree with what Doctor Mengele wants to do. IOW, a family has no say - they are asked then ignored.
Posted by: Jay at April 01, 2005 04:24 AM (PuNh2)
5
Maybe the problem lies in the unquestioning faith we are expected to invest in experts and spec*ialists, or perhaps it's that they have have come to believe in their own infallibility.
Or the issue may be even more fundamental: we are living too long, health care is too expensive, and when the state assumes the financial burden they try to find ways to cut corners, as it were.
Posted by: Debbye at April 01, 2005 08:15 AM (I0F6J)
6
With this kind of thinking,I'm not sure if my Dad and most of his peer group actually cleaned out all the baddies some 60 odd years ago.Sounds like some remnant of them stayed around to fester.
Posted by: big al at April 01, 2005 10:49 AM (SO/54)
7
I don't think going after individuals would have done any long term good, there's just a lot of things weird about the way europeans think. Maybe there's something in the water.
Posted by: Jay at April 01, 2005 02:58 PM (PuNh2)
8
Or the issue may be even more fundamental: we are living too long, health care is too expensive, and when the state assumes the financial burden they try to find ways to cut corners, as it were.
I think that's closest to the truth. I mean, why even begin to ask if the retarded should be euthanised (such a harmless, pretty word) if they are not seen, first, as a burden? Does someone with Downs Syndrome feel pain? Are they in agony? Of course not. The only way this debate even BEGINS is if the society considers them to be worthless and, thus, disposable.
"Euthanasia: Putting them out our misery since 2005"
--new European Medical Association slogan
Posted by: Tuning Spork at April 01, 2005 10:58 PM (ZTSbg)
9
I absolutely support a right to die. I think it is just cruel to expect someone to live with untreatable pain or what they reasonably think is an undignified existence if they can clearly state their wish to die. It is the basic individual right.
But when the state, or the state's experts start deciding for me or for Tuning Spork's Down Child example or (cringe) for his parents then it scares the hell out of me. I was stunned when I read what the Dutch were up to. I can only hope that this was something under the Dutch population's radar and not something that has been debated and accepted. From what I understand of the deception involved it appears that this is not a popular or well known policy.
"Euthanasia: Putting them out our misery..."
Sounds right on the money.
Posted by: mikem at April 02, 2005 12:30 AM (EzNXf)
10
Of course, that should read
"Putting them out OF our misery". But that was understood, I think. I hate when leave words out.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at April 02, 2005 02:02 PM (xbU4Y)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 30, 2005
Don't mess with Ann
Mar. 30 - Not
entirely a surprise:
Ann Coulter causes stir at KU although the headline is misleading - usually, it's the hecklers who are said to cause the stir.
Or maybe they didn't approve of her solution:
"Could 10 of the largest College Republicans start walking up and down the aisles and start removing anyone shouting?" Coulter asked.
(Link via
Drudge Report.)
Posted by: Debbye at
03:17 PM
| Comments (23)
| Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
1
She should have thrust her fist-sized AdamÂ’s apple at them. That would have created quite a stir.
Also: Ann Coulter is not a real person. I have it on good authority that she's a project undertaken by a vegan art collective. The real life "Ann Coulter" was a previously unemployed car show model who joined the collective and gives voice to their "opinions". (her columns are written by a gender-queer couple and an Inuit working in tandem throughout the night)
"Ann Coulter" is a neo-Dadaist attempt to destroy political discourse in the United States by having Ann become more and more unhinged and see how many of you suckers still buy it.
It's brilliant political humor once you get the joke.
Too bad none of you nuts do.
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 30, 2005 04:47 PM (t+KkC)
2
You have a real problem with gays, don't you, Blackglasses? I noticed that you have used the Adams apple remark several times. I guess you became frustrated that others did not congratulate you on your Canadian attempt at humor and decided to just come right out with the "queer" remark. Between your homoerotic descriptions of other commenters and your frequent citing of homosexuals of both genders, it is obvious that you are a self-hater.
Your emotions are fully validated.
Posted by: mikem at March 30, 2005 06:02 PM (EzNXf)
3
Big Macs are tasty.
So is lowering the discourse into childish name calling.
I win
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 30, 2005 06:49 PM (t+KkC)
4
"So is lowering the discourse into childish name calling."
You are delightfully clueless. If you were a child we would all be remarking on how cute your lack of awareness is, but as an adult it is just sad.
Posted by: mikem at March 30, 2005 07:10 PM (EzNXf)
5
I am amazed that anyone would pay Ann Coulter $25,000 for a lecture that was supposed to be "funny".
I saw her in a CBC interview and she was beligerent and mean spirited. I hope the CBC did not pay her that amount, because the money could have been much better applied elsewhere where it could have done some good.
Besides, you could get a whole group of better commedians at Yuk Yuk's to perform all evening for perhaps $4,000 or $5,000 and that would have included free beer for the House.
And what is Ann Coulter's actual point? Well, she thinks that Ted Kennedy is overweight and that its funny to make fun of him.
No wonder so many people who have seen her have dismissed her as a stupid bitch. And indeed, from the looks of it, not a very rich, silly bitch.
Posted by: Joe Green at March 30, 2005 08:10 PM (5dXW9)
6
Meanwhile Joe Green is hilarious and he's doing it for free!
Posted by: TimR at March 30, 2005 10:00 PM (rr+yX)
7
"You are delightfully clueless. If you were a child we would all be remarking on how cute your lack of awareness is, but as an adult it is just sad.
Posted by mikem"
Hmm...You are delightfully clueless. If you were a child we would all be remarking on how cute your lack of awareness is, but as an adult it is just sad.
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 30, 2005 10:12 PM (t+KkC)
8
Well, Joe, at least we now know what is lacking in your life.
After a great deal of mental strain and consideration of Ann Coulter's writings, the best that the 'tolerant' Canadian can come up with is that she "is a stupid bitch" and "not a very rich, silly bitch".
Why is it so difficult to find a male Canadian who can state a criticism about a woman without regressing to Neanderthal misogyny?
With Blackglasses' remarks in another thread about "queers" and "Ann Coulter's Adams apple", maybe we should give up on expecting any sort of civilized discussion from such a backward people
Posted by: mikem at March 30, 2005 10:25 PM (EzNXf)
9
There is another brilliant Canadian on the loose: Blackglasses, showing off how he can repeat what an American says. And he's only 23 years old!
A few more years and Canadians will graduate to "I know you are but what am I?" and "I'm rubber, you're glue..."
Posted by: mikem at March 30, 2005 10:37 PM (EzNXf)
10
Round the clock updates and obsessive checking brought to you today by mikem!
PS: did i upset you when i made fun of Annie?
I know that her main selling point is that she is supposed to be "sexy" and "stunning"- after all, she says abosoultely nothing worth repeating, except as an elaborate joke-but seriously she's not that attractive. And since she makes fun of appearences, then it is fair game to do the same.
Look at those freakish legs, those simian-like hands and monsterous face (as well as Adam's apple).
Ew.
Sorry for runing your elaboarte fanatsy involving Ann, fishnet stockings, a pile of bricks and a copy of the NSS 2002 infront of a roaring fire.
* Please attack this part and this part only. Thank you.
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 30, 2005 11:39 PM (t+KkC)
11
"Sorry for runing [sic] your elaboarte [sic] fanatsy [sic] involving Ann,..."
You spelled five out eight words correctly, Blackglasses. Good Boy!
Canada, just showing off. Visit us tooday!
Posted by: mikem at March 31, 2005 12:04 AM (EzNXf)
12
Awesome.
Can i post my essays here and have you speel check them? I mean, that's all you do now.
(PS: I can't wait for your overly emotive, insincere and, quite frankly, hilarious posts today once begin jerking off to FOX and its 24 hour feed)
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 31, 2005 10:43 AM (t+KkC)
13
It bodes well for your self esteem that you take pride in laziness and ignorance.
Posted by: mikem at March 31, 2005 11:27 AM (EzNXf)
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 31, 2005 12:47 PM (t+KkC)
15
"last word. I win"
That standard of excellence explains a lot about the dearth of intelligent comment from our Canadian neighbors. Simple goals please simple minds.
Posted by: mikem at March 31, 2005 01:51 PM (EzNXf)
16
That standard of excellence explains a lot about the dearth of intelligent comment from our American neighbors. Simple goals please simple minds- as well as FOX News.
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 31, 2005 05:18 PM (t+KkC)
17
Nice comeback, by your standards I guess. I'm always impressed when my grandchildren reach the age where they can imitate and mimic others. As aggravating as it is, it is somewhat cute. Of course, in America we outgrow that stage within a few months. In Canada it seems to be a lifetime survival mechanism.
Posted by: mikem at March 31, 2005 06:37 PM (EzNXf)
18
new angle? old immature man participating in a childish flame war.
That's sadder than you defending Hawaii from the Vietcong.
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 31, 2005 08:33 PM (t+KkC)
19
I never said I fought the Vietcong. Is that yet another false accusation you are making?
Do you realize how pathetic it sounds for someone who has never served to be accusing someone who has of cowardice for not having served in a combat zone?
You wouldn't make it three days in the service. You would get caught stealing from your buddy and then you would cry at how unfair it was that you were caught.
Posted by: mikem at March 31, 2005 09:11 PM (EzNXf)
20
"Charlie's overruning the bar!!! CALL IN AIR SUPPORT!"
Posted by: Blackglasses at April 01, 2005 02:05 AM (t+KkC)
21
Air support is here, and I'm bombing your ass off this site, Blackglasses.
Posted by: Debbye at April 01, 2005 08:17 AM (I0F6J)
22
Mike, why all the anti-Canadian comments? Childish anti-american drivel from Blackglasses and Joe Green shouldn't give you a carte blanche to insult the rest of us.
Posted by: Dougm at April 01, 2005 10:46 AM (XlMBl)
23
Fair enough, Dougm. I would have the same reaction as you. But you are seeing things several months into a constant drumbeat of what I view as ridiculous smug generalizations and self serving stereotypes about Americans and America. Some of my anti-Canadian remarks, and I think that is a fair description, are directed at Canadian policy and actions, but many are simply meant to get someone Canadian to disown hateful (and I mean hateful, not just sharp) comments by another Canadian. Except for very recently, that has not happened.
I think you have a valid point, from your perspective.
Posted by: mikem at April 01, 2005 01:24 PM (EzNXf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 18, 2005
Updating the blogroll
Mar. 16 - More additions to the blogroll, mostly in the growing Great White North section (and a big hooray! for the growing blogging community up here.)
Under News and Commentary:
Austin Bay Blog
Salim Mansur homepage
Canada Free Press
From Canada:
Italics Mine
Angry in the Great White North
A Journey Through Time
Hacks and Wonks
Strong World
Rightwing.ca
Canada Free Press Blog
My Left Wing Girlfriend
myrick.ca, a Canadian living in Shanghai
Soldier blogs:
letters from garrison
Marine Corp. Moms (don't tell me they don't serve!)
The rest of the world:
Davids Medienkritik, an American living in Germany
Aldaynet
Country Store
Who Tends the Fires
Half-Canadian
Geek Empire
The Warrior Scholar
Garfield Ridge
I know some of the sites already on have gone dormant, but I stubbornly hope they will return to posting (because I'm a hopeless optimist.)
Off to work. Party hearty, you lucky souls for whom Friday is Friday.
Posted by: Debbye at
08:36 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 159 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Hey, thanks for the link, Debbye, I'll be happy to return the favor.
And hey, in case you didn't get the memo, women are scared of politics. You lot are too soft, liable to swoon at a nasty remark. You know, stick to hobbies like knitting, and being pregnant.
So thanks for putting the lie to such stupidity, keep up the good work
Posted by: francisthegreat at March 19, 2005 01:57 AM (nuIsA)
2
Thanks for the kind words, Frank!
You are spot on: without the Kevin Drums and Steven Levys of the world, folks might have thought female poli-bloggers were just regular people who were interested in politics, but now the truth is out: we are confronting our Fear of Politics through blogging!
Posted by: Debbye at March 19, 2005 10:22 AM (oAR9w)
3
Debbye,
thanks for the link, it's much appreciated. Being American in T.O. was one of the first Canadian blogs I ever read and it has been on my blog roll for some time now.
Keep up the great work!
Posted by: Bill at March 19, 2005 09:01 PM (3G4Ez)
4
Bill, I'm only sorry it took so long. I'm no techie, and venturing into indexes and hyper tag stuff is a fearful thing!
You have a good, straight-shooting writing style. Common sense is vastly underrated.
Posted by: Debbye at March 19, 2005 10:16 PM (w6cQu)
5
Thanks from me as well. It's much appreciated.
Posted by: Chris Myrick at March 19, 2005 11:42 PM (d1fI7)
6
AWESOME!!! More dummies!
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 21, 2005 08:21 PM (t+KkC)
7
AWESOME!!! More dummies!
Whenever liberals cannot hold their own in an argument, they will resort to name-calling. (Ann Coulter)
Posted by: Bill at March 22, 2005 12:23 AM (ukM0n)
8
Chris, again I apologize for taking so long! That Asian blogroll of yours is awesome ... I've spent several hours looking at the sites.
Bill, I too like Ann Coulter. She can be a bit over the top, but she hits more nails than she misses.
Posted by: Debbye at March 23, 2005 06:44 AM (Gf7j8)
9
As for name calling: you rightes seem to think that "moonbats" is the absolute apex of wit.
Listen: no one but other bloggers know what that means.
And its not funny anyways.
Pinko was good. Try something like "Terror bride".
Brainstorm here people. I give points out for creativity.
"Moonbats". God. That's what happens when you read nothing but the "DaVinci Code" and watch reality television.
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 26, 2005 06:57 PM (0xnjB)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 17, 2005
Happy St. Pat's
Mar. 17 - Sorry for the light posting today, it's been a wild week at work and I slept longer than usual today. (In other words, I overslept and even as I write this, I'm waiting for the ride I begged from my first-born.)
Happy St. Patrick's Day to you all!
Posted by: Debbye at
09:02 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 57 words, total size 1 kb.
March 16, 2005
Or maybe we'll go just a little
Mar. 16 - I said I
wasn't going to go into it, but how can I resist when
National Post Columnist Barbara Kay takes a
more sober look at the lack of female columnists and, by implication, of female bloggers, and makes this very insightful observation:
Dowd ends her column with a kneejerk feminist suggestion: "I have no doubt there are plenty of brilliant women who would bring grace and guts to our nation's op ed pages ... We just need to find and nurture them."
No, Maureen, you've got it backwards. If a woman needs finding and nurturing, she's wrong for the job. We don't want shrinking violets on our op-ed pages. We want strong proactive women writers with definite opinions, who scorn affirmative action and like to duke it out in public.
Either we are equal or we are not, and that means our work should be judged without consideration of our gender.
(Link via Neale News.)
Posted by: Debbye at
08:33 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 171 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yeah, where is this crap coming from? I guess some people always need a cause...
Posted by: ld at March 17, 2005 05:18 PM (3lT0h)
2
There's the beginnings of a storm that began with Larry Summers and picked up steam in Atlanta.
More tomorrow ...
Posted by: Debbye at March 17, 2005 09:37 PM (p+2KT)
3
What we really need in this country is a debate. The debate should be on the following topic:
"Be it resolved, that Feminism, causes Poverty".
I would argue the affirmative.
A second worthy topic would be:
"Be it resolved that Feminism and Political Power creates lesbians".
I would argue the affirmative of that proposition as well.
Perhaps Kate will engage after her visit with Grant Devine and the criminals in his Cabinet.
Posted by: Joe Green at March 17, 2005 10:12 PM (5dXW9)
4
You got me, Joe. I am laughing at the proposed debate (although I'd prefer you not insult Kate especially during her absence. Not very brave of you ...)
So, why have you waited so long to exhibit your sense of humour?
Or, alternatively, what have you done with the
real Joe Green?
Posted by: Debbye at March 18, 2005 08:00 PM (0vBuo)
5
Debbye wrote:
"Or, alternatively, what have you done with the real Joe Green?"
But you see Debbye my dear girl, I AM the REAL Joe Green. The others are merely unauthorized imitations.
By the way, I really would love to debate the "neocons" on "feminism" and its relationship to poverty.
I guess that is the ultimate tragedy of the right in Canada; they never know when Liberals are just kidding.
While Ollie North may expound on "plausible deniability" as a way to design technical lies, We up here have Shannon's Law which states briefly that no information equals noise.
Posted by: Joe Green at March 21, 2005 05:45 PM (5dXW9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 15, 2005
Precision Guided Humo(u)r
Mar. 15 - It's been awhile since I've been able to do the
New Precision Guided Humor Assignment for the
Alliance of Free Blogs, but this week's essay exam is a goodie that even
I should be able to finish on time:
What should Dan Rather have done to make his last CBS Evening News broadcast more memorable?
Dan's farewell would have been more honourable had he said his last word, Courage, and given an example, so I think he should have said that he wished he had had the courage to investigate the phony documents that ultimately brought him down.
He should have said that even though stonewalling didn't work for Nixon, he was absolutely positive it would work for him.
He should have said that he had been forced to run the story because he needed to get the negatives* of certain photos.**
He should have said that those negatives are also why he conducted a sympathetic interview of Saddam during the run-up to Operation Iraqi Freedom, and then would have been overheard muttering Sean Penn promised "this would be the last time."
*Plausible Denialibilty - he is a journalist who chases stories.
** I know, I know. Video Camera!!!!! No.
Seriously, I wonder if he understands how the degree of his own hubris - pride - brought him down as surely as had Richard Nixon's, and if he understands that basically, they both received pardons.
I didn't always disagree with him, but and his broadcasts, like Cronkite's before, were a staple of my life and it is incredibly sad to see this man who once excelled in his profession publicly disgraced.
And that is why I am angry at him.
Note: I corrected a word error in the second paragraph from the end.
Mar. 16 - Blair of Italics Mine has a good post on Rather's next assignment. Love that final sentence!
Posted by: Debbye at
09:34 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 321 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I used to enjoy his attempts at down home humor. Even though it was pretentious, at least he was trying to appear folksy, while most anchors were trying to distance themselves from middle America and gain points with the NYC crowd.
But I lost faith in his honesty when he refused to publicly retract or apologize for his 'veterans gone wild' special that used non-combat veterans to confess to horrendous war crimes. When the VFW got a hold of the records of his star witnesses and revealed that one had never served in the military at all and three others had never served in combat Rather refused to acknowledge their concerns. Being a veteran I was outraged, being a consumer of news I realized that Rather was more interested in Rather, his reputation and agendas than in any ethics that might normally drive a journalist to right a wrong. Most of his liberal and Democratic supportive reporting came at a time when I still voted Democratic so, in true political fashion, I ignored it.
Rathergate came as no surprise and I would be less than honest if I said that I was sad to see his public disgrace played out so magnificently. He did much to disgrace his profession and he has only himself and his hubris to blame.
While I admire compassion it will have to be better people than me to expend it on Dan.
Posted by: mikem at March 15, 2005 10:56 PM (EzNXf)
2
Not fair to compare him to Nixon. Nixon had the decency (and guts) to resign for the good of the country, to do it on TV.
Rather didn't have that decency (or the guts).
If you're serious what he could have done to make it a memorable (meaning honest and good) farewell he should have talked about how the media was biased and leftwing and his own biases and leftwing slant brought him down. He could have also mentioned how the bias became more important than the truth, which is why journalists exist.
If you're kidding, I think it would have been funny if he had closed with "And it's gonna take me a very long time to spend that $20 million Saddam paid me to make him look good. I'll be spending money tonight like a drunken sailor in Texas who's had too much chile"*.
*Ref the chile part: none of his ratherisms ever made a damn bit of sense, why should mine?
Posted by: Jay at March 15, 2005 11:32 PM (PuNh2)
3
He should have gone out with a bang. He should have had the three best professional wrestlers in America on, and refused to walk-off the air until he got a straight answer from each of them as to whether 1)the sport is fixed or not and 2)if any of the athletes uses steroids [or an alphabet].
Posted by: Blair Hansen at March 16, 2005 10:44 AM (nqjVm)
4
Blair, CBS Smackdown! I wish I'd thoughtof that!
Jay makes a good point that Nixon at least had the decency to resign, but the realist in me knows that they really and truly don't believe they are biased.
Mike put his finger on some of the personable traits that endeared Dan to us as well as that fatal flaw that, in retrospect, inevitably led to Dan's sorry end.
The anti-military attitude behind the "GIs gone wild story" is something that I've recognized in retrospect. At the time it seemed like a story gone bad (it happens) but Dan should have retracted it. He couldn't because he believes the institutions of the military are bad.
But I also remember Dan getting roughed up by Chicago Mayor Daley's thugs at the '68 Dem. Party Convention. They weren't always so pro-Democrat.
Maybe, in a curious way, watching Dan's hubris on nightly TV probably enabled us to clarify why we were turning away from the Democrats.
It is weird for me to accept that I trust Pentagon news releases more than what comes over the air waves, having grown up during the "credibility gap" years.
But the proof is in the pudding, and when DoD accounts consistently turn out to be more correct than the other four news broadcasts, you have to make a choice.
I hope MSM can make the necessary internal corrections for the same reasons I wish the Dems would get their stuff together: the political strength of the nation needs the honest watchdog and the viable alternative posed by a healthy second party.
Maybe my compassion for Dan is also my compassion for the USA, and its root stems from my concerns in the above paragraph.
Posted by: Debbye at March 16, 2005 05:24 PM (12DUk)
5
Debbye - LOL!
VERY happy to have you playing along again :-)
Posted by: Harvey at March 16, 2005 09:34 PM (ubhj8)
6
Harv, I usually remember to check what the assignment is (really! honest!) but my brain still numbs out and I can't even come up with a dumb excuse. And the cats eat it. And ... something to do with squirrels and hamsters.
Posted by: Debbye at March 17, 2005 10:24 AM (Durs3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Here we don't go again
Mar. 15 - I wanted to ignore this one,
Blogging Beyond the Men's Club by Steven Levy, and the call for more diversity in the blogosphere. I didn't want to point out again that blogger is freaking
free so the only impediment to anyone is taking the time to sign up and start posting and linking to other bloggers.
I didn't want to point out that some leading blogs, and I'll cite Wretchard as The Prime Example, may or may not be written by men. Hard to tell if they don't tell.
Even when they tell, how do we really know if the blogger is male, female, white, black, Asian, American or Nepalese?
Yes, I am irritated. And I need sleep. And I really don't need the adrenaline rush this kind of foolishness brings. And I was going to shrug and continue my blog rounds.
But I read this:
And at the Harvard conference, Suitt challenged people to each find 10 bloggers who weren't male, white or English-speaking—and link to them.
Guess the fool
missed Estrogen Week. Sheesh. If you're going to emulate Kevin Drum, at least check his
freaking trackbacks.
I'm ending this post and getting some sleep before I really go estrogen on Levy. The poor man probably means well but just can't overcome the disability of either being a moron or Google-challenged.
(Link via Angry in T.O. in a post which should be read.
Mar. 16 - 17:43: Mr. Levy has at least succeeded in uniting women from both sides of the political spectrum over the Invisibility Factor. Even as he wrote, some sisters were already celebrating Estrogen Month. (Love that poster - I'd love to steal and post it with a bit of editing to change "liberal" to "libertarian".)
Thanks to commenter Elayne for the pointer.
20:18: National Post Columnist Barbara Kay takes a more sober look at the lack of female columnists. I've posted more on it here.
Posted by: Debbye at
04:45 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 331 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Thanks for the mention. I didn't realize you visited my humble little spot in the blogosphere, but I'm glad you saw something you liked. Cheers.
Posted by: angry_in_t_o at March 15, 2005 07:57 PM (+e9PX)
2
If he missed Estrogen Week, you could always direct him to my blog where we're having Estrogen Month through March.
Posted by: Elayne Riggs at March 16, 2005 09:39 AM (eTopE)
3
Elayne, I will happily add the Estrogen Month link to the post in an update. We may be at opposite ends of one political spectrum but that is the point: there are women's voices out there, so why can't they hear us? (Maybe because they are too busy talking ...)
Posted by: Debbye at March 16, 2005 05:39 PM (12DUk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Ninjas or not? You decide ...
Mar. 15 - I really don't know how to take
this. Obviously I should be all puffed up with righteous feminist indignation, but that might lose its effectiveness when I'm doubled over with laughter.
Update: Forgot to include the obligatory be sure and read the comments.
Posted by: Debbye at
10:08 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 58 words, total size 1 kb.
March 10, 2005
Sorry, computer problems
Mar. 10 - Sorry I've been off-line; the fan seized on my computer and I had to take it in to the shop.
I haven't made it through all the comments on earlier posts (although I can see things have been busy) nor have I been able to check my mail box yet. I don't know how much I'll be able to do before I head for work tonight (Mark needs to check and respond to his mail as well) so I probably won't be posting on topical events until tomorrow morning.
The sad part is all the stuff I got done while the computer was down -- horrible stuff like "mending" and cleaning the oven. I suppose it was a shame that it was too cold to do the windows ...
Mar. 11 - Still catching up with comments in earlier posts. I'm beginning to understand why the fan gave out ...
Posted by: Debbye at
05:21 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 159 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Blackglasses was mean to me and Flanstein was throwing erasers. I told them I was taking names and they told me to f**k off.
Posted by: mikem at March 10, 2005 09:55 PM (EzNXf)
2
Debbye: you're back!!!! Good to see you!
I though you had done us all a favor and kicked off.
Posted by: Blackglasses at March 10, 2005 11:08 PM (t+KkC)
3
Experiencing conflicting emotions, BG? Or was that a schizoid transition?
Posted by: mikem at March 10, 2005 11:14 PM (EzNXf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 02, 2005
Regime change
Mar. 2 - Glenn Reynolds re-posts some thoughts from 2002 on the hollow nature of despotic governments and
preference cascades. His excerpt is taken from
Patriotism and Preferences:... In what's known as a "preference cascade," the vanishing of flags and other signs of patriotism from the homes, cars and businesses of the style-setters caused a lot of other people to go along with the trend, perhaps without even fully realizing it, a trend that only strengthened with the politicization of flag displays in several 1980s political campaigns.
The result was a situation in which a lot of people's behavior didn't really match their beliefs, but merely their beliefs about what was considered acceptable. Such situations are unstable, since a variety of shocks can cause people to realize the difference and to suddenly feel comfortable about closing the gap.
That's what the September 11 attacks did.
Sometimes it takes a traumatic event for individuals to decide that they don't care what their neighbours think - they're going to express their feelings and do it assertively.
For Americans it was Sept. 11. For the Lebanese it was the murder of Rafik Hariri.
Posted by: Debbye at
11:26 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 193 words, total size 1 kb.
62kb generated in CPU 0.0531, elapsed 0.1583 seconds.
68 queries taking 0.1021 seconds, 218 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.