November 09, 2004
RNC response to prospect of Dean as DNC Chair
Nov. 9 - Following the announcement that Howard Dean may seek the chairmanship of the DNC, the Republicans were quick to respond. Ace has the letter
here. (Work safe, but not liquid.) [Note: you may have to scroll down past the empty white section to get to the post. It's worth it.]
Posted by: Debbye at
01:16 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 50 words, total size 1 kb.
November 06, 2004
Bush 286, Kerry 252
Nov. 6 - The final Electoral College tally is
Bush 286, Kerry 252 and there is a terrific county-by-county map at the lgf link.
(Via RightOn!.)
Posted by: Debbye at
02:24 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 34 words, total size 1 kb.
November 03, 2004
Kerry concedes
Nov. 3 - Sen. John Kerry telephoned the president to
concede the election and to congratulate Pres. Bush on his victory. The formal concession speech will be made at
1 p.m. ET. 2 p.m. EST.
I hope that this gracious act by the Democratic Party candidate will finally put an end to the bitterness of the 2000 election so that we can, finally, move on and get on about the nation's business. (But not health care. Let Canada continue trying to iron out the problems and learn from them rather than allowing the US gets stuck with the same problems and deadly waiting times.)
The biggest winner of this election was the American soldier. I had expressed the hope after viewing "Stolen Honor" that we had learned our lesson after Vietnam: we cannot ask soldiers to go to war and then renounce that war and therefore them. The Swift Boat vets deserve full credit for raising the public's consciousness as to what we owe our fighting men and women, and I can't prove it but I think that awareness played a role in today's win.
You might find it worthwhile to pay a visit to some ex-pats who have been firm in the defense of their country during these trying times in sometimes politely (and impolitely) hostile countries and usually with overtly hostile news media:
Robert, Austin, John, Jason, Tim, David, Greg, The Diplomad, and Chad (who channels a good Monty Python!)
Although she isn't a blogger (at least so far as I know) ex-pat Janet Daley has a terrific column up in today's Telegraph on a theme which is only too familiar to the rest of us ex-pats.
I wish I could think of something suitable to say to Michael Moore but maybe I'll just go see Team America and giggle a lot.
So ends the election in the second Anglosphere country of the coalition, and unless I was dreaming I seem to remember that Tony Blair too has called an election. Hat trick, anyone?
Posted by: Debbye at
12:17 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 340 words, total size 3 kb.
1
High fives all around!
WOOOOOOO!!
Posted by: Ith at November 03, 2004 08:39 PM (cMSkS)
2
Heh, so I take it you aren't disappointed? It's a bit overwhelming, ya know?
Posted by: Debbye at November 04, 2004 09:58 AM (FhRev)
3
I'm still pinching myself!!
I wonder what it takes to get an invite to an inaugural event? Damn, that would be cool!
Posted by: Ith at November 04, 2004 07:47 PM (z1m3q)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Ohio, thy name is uncertainty
Nov. 3 - The radio station I listen to during breaks at work was calling it for Kerry last night, but I remained serene and didn't respond to the cheering from my (Canadian) co-workers. I had reached the comfort level of knowing that there was absolutely nothing I could do to change the outcome and I will willing to let the people decide without anger or (much) regret.
Okay, you want the truth? I had a bad feeling when I left for work that the president was going to lose this one and had already decided on stoicism. Knowing there would be some subtle jabbing had prepared me to take it all with a rueful smile. It wasn't a courage thing but a prideful thing.
Then, when I got off this morning I learned that the president had won the popular vote (and that is one terrific boost!) and that Ohio was unable to declare a winner due to provisional ballots which left the election results undecided.
If you are looking for polished prose, go to any of the fine names on my blogroll because, in all honesty, I'm stuck somewhere between laughter, frustration, euphoria, and love for my crazy country.
However, if I hear Donna Brazile or any other Democrat say "this president" again I'm going to um, use coarse language. Yeah, that's it. I'll curse 'em heartily.
9:01: I'm finally starting to read and digest the incredible impact of this election. Bush has 51% of the vote. Republicans held onto the White House and increased their majorities in the Senate and House.
Maybe this is the most important victory, though, as commenter mikem said:
... and a final belated and well deserved victory for Vietnam veterans.
That's the part that hurt most during the hours of doubt last night: a sense of having betrayed our soldiers and elected someone they rightly despised as their Commander-in-Chief. The pundits will be analyzing this election
ad nauseum but I doubt they will understand how profoundly the American soldier influenced this election.
And speaking of our soldiers, Greyhawk has a series of posts (start here and keep clicking to each post on the right.) I dare you not to cry.
Bill Whittle has a short post up:
It's Bush. Thank God, it's Bush.
Don't hold back, Bill, tell us how you really feel!
He also has some ideas for what we need to do over the next four years. No resting on our laurels, I guess.
Posted by: Debbye at
07:44 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 421 words, total size 3 kb.
1
An incredible victory. Across the board increases (House, Senate, Governorships and of course the White House) and a final belated and well deserved victory for Vietnam veterans.
Posted by: mikem at November 03, 2004 08:09 AM (EzNXf)
2
Hurray for the Union!!!
Posted by: Dex at November 03, 2004 12:14 PM (fA5su)
3
I fail to see why it is such a "great victory". A two percent victory is not exactly a glowing, gloatable, indication of celebration is it? It is almost as much of a victory as the current Liberal minority government. Wouldnt all you ex-Patriots feel better if it was a 10 or 25 percent difference between democrat and republican?
Posted by: sean at November 03, 2004 04:40 PM (GN3Xe)
4
What a great victory! The first candidate in 16 years (since his father's victory) to win an outright majority of the US popular vote!
From the movie
Team America, "America! Fuck Yeah!"
Posted by: Magnifico at November 03, 2004 06:14 PM (c8h7j)
5
One big thing President Bush needs to do is begin shepherding and training several understudies. We need some dedicated, courageous, and rational conservatives to begin planning to oppose H. Clinton in 2008.
Posted by: Timbre at November 03, 2004 07:13 PM (hUD7d)
6
Sean, your question I think reflects the differences between the US and Canadian systems and organizational structures of government and our political parties.
Americans don't vote on party lines to the extent of Canadians. We tend to vote on the person, which is why so many of us are registered Independent which on the downside precludes us from voting in primaries in many states.
Had Bush won the presidency but the Dems took the Senate and/or House, it would have been a lesser victory because the public would have been sending a clear message of confidence in him but a desire to put the brakes on other issues. (I tend to label it our form of coalition government.)
Our President is not the equivalent of a Prime Minister, but the Chief Executive of the nation in every sense and implication of that title. Laws originate in Congress, not the Oval Office.
The President is not a member of Congress as the PM is of Parliament and doesn't even interact on a day to day level or direct their affairs.
Steven den Beste once wrote an essay (or is that redundant?) that explained some of the major features of that intereaction between our 3 legs of government. I'll try to look it up and link to it in a future post. You may find it interesting.
Posted by: Debbye at November 09, 2004 07:50 AM (Wz4ik)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 02, 2004
Election and Good Advice
Nov. 2 - I predict that a lot of you won't get much more sleep tonight than I did today and that, whatever the outcome, we will survive.
I feel a sense of relief that it's over, and both sides know they have done their best. [Update Nov. 3: I spoke too soon! It isn't over yet ...] It will be interesting to see if there are any observable after-effects of the unprecedented voter turnout and renewed political activism of so many citizens.
Greyhawk is giving some Free Advice, which I think is one of his finest pieces yet.
Until tomorrow.
Posted by: Debbye at
07:58 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 97 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Lets hope for the best and how are you doing?
Posted by: Dex at November 02, 2004 08:37 PM (dIRxW)
2
Good morning, Dex! I'm doing okay (I think!) How about you?
Posted by: Debbye at November 03, 2004 07:15 AM (7Wq0h)
3
Iam doing fine and glad the election is finally over and hope our leaders fine the wisdom to serve the people of our nation.
Posted by: Dex at November 03, 2004 12:18 PM (fA5su)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 01, 2004
Vote for Bush, dammit!
Nov. 1 - We are having a presidential election campaign at a time when our nation is under attack. How stupifying that
Anyone But Bush remains the guiding theme of the opposition! Surely this is a sign of shallowness at the least and outright insanity at the most because it means that
personal feelings about a candidate are motivating far too many voters at a time when
national security is the dominant issue for the first time in their lifetimes.
I don't care if you don't like the President. This shouldn't be a popularity contest because it's an election in a time of war that tests our national character and our ability to look beyond personal likes and dislikes to judge the candidates solely on the basis of how they will address the threat.
This shouldn't be about getting even for the 2000 election. Anyone still angry about that should look at a crater in New York City and consider changing their priorities.
I have some sympathy with those who are having a major ick at the thought of pulling the lever for a Republican. I had never voted Republican in my life before this election. I voted Independent or Democrat without ever considering that a Republican might deserve at least some scrutiny.
That changed Sept. 11, 2001. Ironically, one of my first thoughts was "Thank God a Republican is in the White House" and although I didn't go so far as to decide that hanging chads were instruments of God, I did know that a twist of history had served our country at a time of peril.
I knew instictively that a Republican was more likely to launch a determined counter assault. I knew that something had to break the murderous deadlock at Israel's borders. I knew that we had to deal decisively with Saddam Hussein. Those were my immediate thoughts that fierce day, and I believe more than a few of those who are considering voting for Kerry had those same thoughts until the ongoing propaganda campaign waged by the Michael Moores and Democrats caused them to retreat.
Making fun of Bush may make for clever, cocktail party repartee, but is that actually a strategy for victory?
When we focus on the issues, exactly how does Kerry's platform differ from the president's? Why, he'll do things differently! That is an astonishing statement from the party that had the chance to do things differently for eight years but stayed with a law enforcement approach to international terrorism, and an onimous statement from a man who reminded us that he was a prosecutor and that he wants terrorism reduced to a nuisance comparable to gambling and prostitution.
It is insulting to the survivors and families of the dead from Sept. 11th, Bali, Madrid, Kashmir, Bombay, Jakarta, Moscow, Beslan, the Phillipines, Iraq, Algeria, Tel Aviv, Morocco, and countless other places to realize that a would-be president believes that that they were inconvenienced, not attacked!
We tried the law enforcement approach. We tried the appeasement approach. The Daddy of Terrorism, Yassar Arafat, was a guest in the White House, and you just can't be more accomodating than that.
As for the global test, as events in Rwanda, the Sudan and Iraq failed to pass this global test the less said about it the better.
President Bush did things differently, and the latest bin Laden tape indicates that his approach is working.
Of course that tape too, as with all previous tapes, is pure propaganda. Now we learn that the root cause for Sept. 11 was Lebanon, 1982, not dead Iraqi babies or American troops in Saudi Arabia. It also seems to echo much of Michael Moore's Farenheit 911, and I hope that people are finally making the connection that Moore's work is also propaganda.
We overtly reject OBL's offer of a cease fire, but the Kerry campaign in effect promotes a cease-fire by his failure to embrace the underlying reasons for launching Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Governments in the Mid-east that are governed by consensus, freedom of speech, press and religion will undercut the themes of desperation and impotency that al Qaeda and other Islamists use to encourage terrorist acts.
It's a long shot, admittedly. It's risky. It's one of the biggest gambles in our nation's history (maybe as as big as the one in 1776) and can backfire even now, but attempts to maintain the status quo in the Mid-east have already backfired and only greatened the threat.
We are fighting now so that our children and grandchildren don't have to fight. We are fighting now, when we have a chance of victory, than wait until we are cornered. We are fighting now to save Muslim lives, because if we are cornered there's no telling what we may do to save ourselves.
I voted by absentee ballot for President Bush because if we are to stand for anything it must be defiantly on our feet, not abjectly on our knees.
Note: One person who epitimized defiance in the face of the enemy was Winston Churchill, and Ghost of a Flea has the latest in his Winston Reviews on line. I urge Americans to read his latest, Review No. 17, here, and Canadians to read his Can-con post here.
Posted by: Debbye at
05:41 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 884 words, total size 5 kb.
1
If you were to consider for a second, a reality that involved John Kerry winning, how do you see the War in Iraq moving?
Posted by: sean at November 01, 2004 08:30 PM (Sb1j7)
2
I am running for a local post in FL. If elected I would try to pass a "nude negro law". This law would require all black people to be nude when out and about in public. The crime rate in my town has gotten out of hand. Studies have shown that this measure would put a huge dent in the crime rate.
Posted by: john at November 01, 2004 09:04 PM (CczYN)
3
Time for us to trade places. As a Canadian living in the US, I will be happy to see George Bush win...so that the Republicans will NOT be in the White House again for the next generation.
The Christian/Faith-Based/Neo-Conservative agenda has torn the US apart. The country will go bankrupt, be at war, under attack, or living in Homeland Security camps in Kansas by 2008.
Faith and blinders are not enough. The US is not fighting for anything but maintaining its worldwide hegemony and power. Acceptance of the fact that Empires fall when they are no longer relevant will make the transition to a normal and equal player on the world scene.
A superpower is no longer necessary. Next time the neocons get uppity, remind them about the Visgoths.
The Visigoths are out there. The barbarians at the gate...and they are the rest of the world.
Posted by: Stephen Pierzchala at November 01, 2004 09:50 PM (Mjbii)
4
What is with the liberal enchantment with the Taliban and Saddams of the world? A fanatical theocratic dictatorship is overthrown, a butcher is awaiting the justice of his Iraqi victims and Canadians are whining because America, Britain, Australia and others had the guts to do it. Millions are being 'oppressed' with the once fantastical chance at democracy and leftists are screaming "Empire!". There was a time when leftists were appropriately shamed by the sins of communism/Stalinism, but obviously the infatuation has not gone away. The great thing for neo-cons like myself is that the Democratic party will not disassociate itself from the above type rants and has moved itself further to the left in American voter' eyes. Kerry may yet win, but it will have taken a full court press by a now exposed media to accomplish it. A Bush defeat would be painful, but the Democrats will have paid a long lasting price for nominating a man widely viewed by half of America as an out and out traitor to the men and women he would command.
Posted by: mikem at November 02, 2004 02:32 AM (EzNXf)
5
Sean, that's a good question with no one answer. I don't know how this election is perceived by Iraqis, but my worst fear would be that they would think that Americans were repudiating Operation Iraq Freedom and that would undercut their confidence both in us and in themselves and give heart to the "insurgents." We abandoned the Iraqis before in '91, and it would be double the shame to do so again. A Kosovo-type quagmire was averted by turning power over to the provisional government and setting the date for elections, but Kerry could delay them which too would encourage more violence. Which party controls the House and Senate comes into play also, and underlines the "separation of powers" principle by which the US government operates (or achieves little.) The bigger question is how Kerry's election would play in Iran, as he has indicated he wants to make a deal the mullahs, something that cuts the heart out of Iranian dissidents, as well as how his election would be perceived in Syria and Lebanon. Sorry if that is vague, but the differences in how Kerry is viewed by the
Toronto Star and the
Washington Post, both which support him but which seem to see two entirely different Kerrys, doesn't give me confidence in analyzing views in languages I can't even read.
John, you are a lying scumbag. Take your racist trolling elsewhere.
Stephen, no offense but you might read a history book sometime. This is hardly the most divisive election in US history and is milder than many in my own lifetime. By the way, do you extend your revulsion for faithful Christians to faithful Muslims?
The countries promoting liberty are the US, Australia and Britain. Sorry if we fail your views of what is civilized, but I prefer our version over Ba'athist and Islamic fascism.
Mikem, you are the indomitable voice of reason as always! Those people who are willing to see thousands of dead Iraqis just to prove the US wrong are seriously twisted.
I grieve for the Democratic Party. How far it has fallen from the legacies of Roosevelt and Kennedy.
Posted by: Debbye at November 02, 2004 10:52 AM (UdMDW)
6
It's always seemed to me that the Left's total disregard for any and all offences done by the usual assortment of dictators and President's For Life,seem to be motivated by a combination of greed,sloth and selfishness....Since most Lefties seem to already have a good sized chunk of the Good Life,it seems to me that any effort to bring about change and bring freedom to other peoples might invove them losing a few crumbs off of their own slice of the pie ,so to speak...And it is so much easier to go a gathering with a homemade sign with "Bush=Hitler" and talk about it over a Starbucks Latte then to actually have to put oneself or one's loved ones in a dirty,dusty ,dangerous place where real things might get done.
Posted by: big al at November 02, 2004 02:22 PM (0+Ub2)
7
"We are fighting now so that our children and grandchildren don't have to fight. We are fighting now, when we have a chance of victory, than wait until we are cornered."
Perfectly put. This war is here and it must be fought. The only question is when.
Great post, Debbye :-)
Posted by: Harvey at November 02, 2004 05:09 PM (tJfh1)
8
Stephen - I'm assuming you are in the States studying at one of America's fine institutions of higher learning. Brown? NYU? Michigan? Doesn't matter, as they are all the same, as evidenced by your excellent note-taking skills. You'll do great on the exam, and I think there is another showing of "Fahrenheit 9/11" down at the student union before the polls close tonight, and there are no doubt still some girls who really get enthused about a chap who knows his hegemonic theory.
I have to admit, however, it is all rather tiresome to those of us old enough to have lived through this back in our own venerable grad school days (in my case in the UK) when Reagan was the Christian/Neo-Con/Barbarian/Visigoth etc etc. Sadly for academe, Ronnie was right. And, sorry to say for your sake, is GWB.
Posted by: JGS at November 02, 2004 05:31 PM (f/s2M)
Posted by: john at November 02, 2004 06:47 PM (CczYN)
10
Stephen, due to constraints of time, I won't even begin to address most of the, shall I say, complete stupidity in your post. Except for one thing: we can handle the rest of the world. Neoconservatism is a belief based on keeping the barbarians away from our gate, and it is succeeding.
"Thank God a Republican is in power" was my thought on 9-11 as well.
Posted by: Chase at November 02, 2004 07:02 PM (g+up/)
Posted by: john at November 03, 2004 03:56 PM (CczYN)
12
What a sad day for America. You have suffered a rigged election that cannot be checked or audited to an international standard, you have been saddled with a fanatic in the White House together with rigged elections for the Congress and for the Senate that has turned the country into a one party state. No wonder so many Americans are now fleeing the US for other places around the globe as political refugees.
The fanatics in the White House are now going to attack Iran rather like Hitler attacked Poland. No one is going to oppose them because those that do will have been locked away in concentration camps run by Homeland Security.
There is no need for barbarians for this Empire to fall apart, because its doing so all by itself.
The American Dream is becoming the Amerikan Nightmare.
Now remember to say your prayers tonight, or the religious police from Gerry Falwell's Church will arrest you, beat you and rob you of your money.
The Good Book teaches that "he who sows the wind, will reap a whirlwind" and it is going to show in the unfolding days and weeks ahead, that Amerika really is the Great Satan.
Who would have ever thought that the Mullahs in Tehran could be right afterall?
Posted by: Joe Green at November 08, 2004 08:05 PM (5dXW9)
13
Joe, I don't know on what basis you are making your claims but last time I looked the free press was very free, nobody was forced to attend Bible school, and Michael Moore was running around free. He didn't suddenly die from a heart attack (and let's face it, he's a prime candidate so nobody could prove anything) and if the police state was going to start somewhere it would certainly be to firebomb that propaganda centre known as Hollywood.
If the election was rigged, Bush would have taken either California or NY which would have destroyed the Democratic Party and garnered several state legislatures under Republican rule as well. (Hint: the best possible outcome would be to hold 3/4 of the seats in each House.)
Of course, having an armed poplace tends to restrain our government from any Hitler-like tendencies, and the civilian-based, volunteer army would likely mutiny before breaking the law forbidding their intervention in civil affairs.
I guess as a fascist states go, we just couldn't cut it. I doubt we ever could: we love liberty so much we'll even defend the right of others to have it.
Maybe you should visit the U.S. someday and wonder why people who are complaining about the police state are free to run around complaining about the police state.
Posted by: Debbye at November 09, 2004 08:08 AM (Wz4ik)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
43kb generated in CPU 0.0581, elapsed 0.1096 seconds.
65 queries taking 0.0831 seconds, 154 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.